Att 2HT941026Q2070 Past Perf Quest.docx

DOCX document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
Radiation Oncology’s Xstrahl superficial x-ray unit Services
Solicitation number
HT941026Q2070
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template issued by the Defense Health Agency (DHA) Western Markets for solicitation HT941026Q2070. The questionnaire is designed to validate contractor past performance for non-personal services related to Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Services at Naval Medical Center San Diego, California. Responses must be submitted via email to dania.suazo.civ@health.mil no later than August 13, 2026.

The questionnaire assesses contractor performance across five primary rating areas: Overall Fill Rate (Quality of Service), On-Time Fill Percentage (Schedule), Turnover Rate (Management), and Replenishment Rate (Management). Each area uses a five-point performance scale ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with options for "Not Applicable." Evaluators must assess the contractor's ability to provide qualified healthcare workers in compliance with contract terms, maintain staffing levels, recruit and retain specialized personnel in difficult-to-fill positions, deliver personnel on schedule with complete credentialing packages, minimize worker turnover and operational disruption, and plan for replacement candidates during planned and unplanned absences. The questionnaire also includes yes/no questions regarding contract award recommendation and any default or cause termination history. References must provide detailed explanations for any ratings other than Satisfactory and for any negative responses regarding contract award or termination.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
DHA PWS - Non-Personal Svcs_EXSTRAHL.docx DOCX document
HT941026Q2070 Combined Synopsis Solicitation.docx DOCX document
HT941026Q2070 Att 3 PRICING.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

THIS SAMPLE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

DHA Western Markets is conducting a Firm-Fixed Price Competitive solicitation. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.

Solicitation Number, HT941026Q2070 is for non-personal services of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Services at NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO, CA.

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance and return via email no later than 08/13/2026 to dania.suazo.civ@health.mil.

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Telephone:

Email:

OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

Telephone Number:

Email:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.

(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.

Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provided qualified Health Care Workers (HCW) IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Ensured that qualified HCW’s remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Recruited, placed, and retained qualified HCW’s with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provide qualified HCW’s on time IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Provided complete, current and accurate qualifying package for each HCW IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Provided complete, current and accurate credentialing/privileging packages within established time frames IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Retained qualified HCWs without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to, include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Yes
No

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provide an explanation:

Was the contract terminated for default or cause:

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments:

Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________

Print Name: _________________________________________

Title: _______________________________________________

Telephone: __________________________________________

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .