Att 1 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24523R0046
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluation of proposals submitted in response to solicitation number 36C24523R0046. The questionnaire is to be completed by a reference for an offeror proposing to provide technical assistance services for the Supportive Services for Veteran Families program, administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 5. The questionnaire evaluates the offeror's performance on a prior contract across quality, management, cost control, and general metrics. Respondents are asked to provide ratings and comments assessing the offeror's performance in areas such as conformance to requirements, workmanship standards, responsiveness, personnel management, cost forecasting accuracy, and invoicing.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24523R0046 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24523R0046 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att 3 Business Associate Agreement.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att 4 Contractor Certification- Immigration.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att 2 Contractor Rules of Behavior.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24523R0046.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire The Department of Veterans Affairs is evaluating a proposal submitted by _________________________ [Offeror’s name], hereafter referred to as “Offeror,” to provide technical assistance for Supportive Services for Veteran Families Offeror has provided your name so that we may ask you questions regarding Offeror’s past performance on a similar contract between your company and Offeror.
Any information you provide in this questionnaire is considered Source Selection Information and is prohibited from disclosure and exempt from release under the Freedom of Information Act; as such, the Department of Veterans affairs will not release your name or the names of other individuals providing reference information about Offeror’s past performance.
Instructions: Be honest. Provide an assessment of Offeror’s past performance by checking the box of one the following rating options. You are encouraged to write comments as often as you’d like. If your assessment is “Excellent” or “Unacceptable,” then please provide a brief narrative that explains your rationale for the rating.
Rating Options:
Exceptional—Offeror’s performance exceeds (or exceeded) most contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
Very Good—Offeror’s performance exceeds (or exceeded) some contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were highly effective.
Satisfactory—Offeror’s performance meets (or met) all contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with minor issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were effective.
Marginal—Offeror’s performance meets (or met) some contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with frequent problems, issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were somewhat effective.
Unsatisfactory—Offeror’s performance does not meet (or did not meet) contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with significant problems, issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Not Applicable—Unable to provide a meaningful assessment.
Contract Number:
Title:
Period of performance:
Performance Assessment
1. Quality of performance
a. What is your overall assessment of the quality of Offeror’s performance?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Comments:
b. Assess Offeror’s quality of performance in these areas:
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Conformance to contract requirements
Standards of workmanship (technical, professional, safety, etc.)
2. Management performance
a. What is your overall assessment of Offeror’s ability to meet contract requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
b. Assess Offeror’s contract management performance in these areas:
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Management responsiveness (timeliness, reliability, cooperation, etc.)
Management of personnel (hiring, training, retaining, replacing, etc.)
Management of program (coordination, use of resources, communication, risk management, etc.)
Management of conflicts or issues (reactive, provides good solutions, flexible to changing needs, etc.)
3. Cost control
a. What is your overall assessment of Offeror’s ability to forecast, manage and control costs?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
b. Assess Offeror’s cost control performance in these areas:
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Cost/Price Estimates (ability to meet forecasted costs/prices)
Invoicing accuracy and timeliness of invoice submission
4. General comments
Assessor’s Signature:_____________________________________ Date:_____________________
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATION!
Source Selection Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .