Atch J.4 - Past Performance Survey - 08-19-21.docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SUBSCRIPTION AGENT SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 86614621R00004
About this file
This document contains a past performance survey for a federal contract opportunity to provide subscription agent services. The Department of Housing and Urban Development is seeking a contractor to furnish all professional, technical, and clerical personnel and services to monitor, track, renew, and place orders for multiple housing data subscriptions for various HUD field offices. The contractor will be responsible for payment of each subscription as required and notifying the Contracting Officer Representative when payments and renewals are completed. Offerors must submit pricing for the subscriptions as an Excel spreadsheet attachment. The past performance survey collects input from references on offerors' past performance on quality, schedule, cost control, business relations, and management of key personnel for previously completed similar projects.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 86614621R00004 0001.pdf | ||
| Atch J.2 - Past Performance Information Chart - 08-19-21.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 86614621R00004 Subscription Agent Services 1 - 08-19-21.pdf | ||
| 86614621R00004 Subscription Agent Services - 08-19-21.pdf | ||
| Atch J.3 - Past Performance Narrative - 08-19-21.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch J.1 - Pricing of Subscriptions - 08-19-21.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment __J.4__ - Past Performance Survey Email Survey to CPOFTW@hud.gov Solicitation Number _86614621R0004___________
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
All responses should be sent to CPOFTW@hud.gov and include the RFP number 86614621R0004 and title SUBSCRIPTION AGENT SERVICES and name of Offeror in the email subject.
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):
This past performance survey is to be completed on the designated contractor as designated below:
OFFEROR PRIME CONTRACTOR NAME:_________________________________________________________ OFFEROR PRIME CONTRACTOR DUNS NO:______________________________________________________
| CONTRACTOR |
| Click here to enter text. |
| CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PROJECT TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS |
| Click here to enter text. |
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Reference):
| NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| AGENCY or CUSTOMER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PHONE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Click here to enter text. |
| DESCRIPTION OF SERVICS PERFORMED |
| Click here to enter text. |
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is procuring the services described in the box below. You have been selected by the contractor identified above to provide past performance information to HUD to be used in evaluating the offeror’s proposal for this acquisition. Thank you for your input.
Summarize the services acquired here.
For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. For any rating that is checked Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
2. SCHEDULE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: : (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
3. COST CONTROL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: : (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .