Asbestos Lead Survey_Bldg-629_20151022.pdf

October 22, 2015

Mr. Aaron Williams USACE, Tulsa District 1645 South 101st East Avenue Tulsa, OK 74128 Phone: (918) 669-4915

RE: Submittal of Hazardous Building Material Surveys Contract No. W912BV-10-D-2011, Task Order 0002 Ft. Bliss Bldg. # 629

Dear Mr. Williams, This document summarizes the Asbestos Survey and/or Lead Paint Survey Reports for the subject building.

The below listed information was utilized to complete the Scope of Work Tasks:

Bldg. No. 629 POC: Jesse Moncada Phone No: 915-568-1838 Building Square Footage (SF) Reported: 1,870 Technical Summary:

1. LEAD PAINT. ENCON performed a total of seventy-seven (77) XRF analyses, which included seventy

(70) building component measurements and seven (7) calibration checks. Forty-eight (48) of the building readings tested positive for lead paint. Refer to the attachments for more details.

2. ASBESTOS. A total of fifty-one (51) bulk samples were effectively collected for lab analysis of this subject building. The attached analytical results indicated that asbestos containing materials were present in the subject building. Contact Ft. Bliss, DPW regarding the latest overall status of any asbestos or lead paint materials.

SUMMARY TABLE (with Action Level) Previously Surveyed by others

Were Found

Were Not Found

Actions Required Yes / No

1. Lead Containing Paint Materials (≥0.3 mg/cm2) X Yes

2. Asbestos Containing Materials (>1 %) X Yes

Please contact me with any technical questions, or follow-up needs that you may have.

Sincerely, David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Project Manager – ALL Consulting

CC: Jesse Moncada (Ft Bliss DPW) Barry Vercoe (CESFW-PEC-TM)

ATTACHMENTS

1. Lead Paint Survey Report

2. Asbestos Survey Report

ATTACHMENT 1

Lead Paint Survey Report

COMPREHENSIVE LEAD PAINT SURVEY

BUILDING 629

FORT BLISS, TEXAS 79916

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Tulsa District

Prepared by:

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

ENCON International, Inc.

7307 Remcon Circle, #103

El Paso, TX 79912 and

ALL Consulting, LLC 1718 S. Cheyenne Ave.

Tulsa, OK 74119

Inspection Start Date:

September 25, 2015

LEAD PAINT SURVEY REPORT

Ft. Bliss, Texas ─ Building 629

PURPOSE

The ALL Consulting Team was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Tulsa

District, to perform comprehensive Hazardous Building Materials Surveys to identify the presence of any asbestos or lead paint at a number of buildings at Ft. Bliss, Texas. This project also included the development and population of a database to store the survey reports for access by the Ft. Bliss

Directorate of Public Works (DPW), and others. The buildings that are included within this contract scope of work includes buildings at McGregor Base Camp and Doña Ana Base Camp within the New Mexico portion of Ft. Bliss, in addition to the Ft. Bliss buildings within Texas.

BACKGROUND

Ft. Bliss has a large number of buildings constructed before 1990 when the use of asbestos and lead paint was prevalent in the construction of buildings. Because the presence of these materials still exists in these buildings, Ft. Bliss is required to identify the extent of the lead paint remaining at these buildings, as well as their condition. Lead in paint is a hazard that is regulated by the

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) under 29 CFR 1926.62 for worker exposure. In addition to the dangers of occupational exposure to construction and maintenance workers, as well as building occupants, lead particles and lead dust may be inadvertently carried home on clothes and shoes to expose their families. Identifying components containing lead paint will not only protect the workers and their families, but will help to indemnify Ft. Bliss by preemptively identifying the location of these potential hazardous materials.

INTRODUCTION

In accordance with OSHA Lead Regulation 29 CFR 1926.62, and the OSHA Hazard

Communication standard (29 CFR 1910.1200), where lead exists workers must be notified and steps must be taken to protect them from the inherent hazards. By identifying the lead containing components in these buildings, and, when appropriate, removing the hazards or potential hazards, Ft. Bliss avoids the liability of workers becoming exposed. Lead paint was banned for use in residential dwellings starting in January of 1978, but lead paint is still available for non-residential applications.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

Building 629 was constructed in 1934, and was in use at the time of inspection. Its previous use was listed as an “administrative building.” A description of this building is presented in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 – BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Items Description Area of building 1,870 square feet Date of Construction 1934 Number of floors One (1) floor Exterior wall materials Brick Roof type Pitched Roof material Shingles Interior walls Brick, drywall, plaster, concrete, ceramic tiles Interior floors Concrete Interior floor coverings Carpet, sheet vinyl, floor tile under carpet Ceilings Plaster Notes:

UNIQUE PAINTING HISTORY

Lead can be found in paint, varnish, shellac, and stain, so any coated surface other than a factory coating is suspect for lead paint. A Lead Paint Survey is based upon coated components which are grouped into similar components with a similar (unique) painting history. This would include components with the same substrate, built or installed at the same time, with a common painting history. Items such as window components (sash and mullions), window frame (trim, header, sill, and apron), doors, and door frame materials, should be considered to have a possible separate painting history, and could have had different coatings applied throughout the years.

REGULATORY STANDARDS

Lead-based paint in residential structures, or Child Occupied Facilities (day care facilities, etc.), is regulated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under 24 CFR 35, and also by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under 40 CFR 745. Only a few of these types of facilities have been identified in the buildings included in this contract. For all buildings included in this category, both HUD and EPA regulations will apply. All other buildings identified in this project would be regulated under the OSHA standards pertaining to worker protection from hazards (29 CFR 1926.62).

Sampling protocols have already been thoroughly established by the HUD and the EPA for residential housing units. For non-residential structures, there is no specified lead paint sampling protocol, but HUD / EPA protocols were generally followed. These comprehensive lead paint surveys include thorough inspections to identify all lead painted components.

SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

The building materials survey tasks were performed in accordance with the Final Hazardous

Building Materials Surveys, Sampling Plan, Fort Bliss, Texas, December 2014, prepared by ALL

Consulting and ENCON International, Inc. A visual inspection of the building was conducted to develop a sampling strategy. This included identifying component groups with similar painting histories. Each component group was sampled throughout the building to establish whether or not the building contained lead at the prescribed action level for this project, at the time of the survey.

This Lead Paint Inspection was performed on September 25, 2015 using an x-ray fluorescence

(XRF) analyzer, to identify if any lead amounts in the paint were at or above 0.3 mg/cm2. A total of seventy-seven (77) XRF analyses were performed, which included seventy (70) building component measurements and seven (7) calibration checks. Drawings that illustrate the locations of all building measurements that tested positive for lead have been provided in Appendix A of this Report.

XRF RESULTS

The XRF analyzer indicated that lead-containing paint was identified in the building component types listed in the following Table 2. The table also provides additional details regarding building component types, and if the tested components were located at the exterior or interior of the subject building.

TABLE 2: LEAD CONTAINING COMPONENT TYPES

Component Substrate Condition Color

Interior Building

DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE

DOORWAY CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE

DOOR WOOD FAIR TAN

DOOR CASING METAL FAIR WHITE

Component Substrate Condition Color

DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE

WINDOW WOOD FAIR WHITE

WINDOW SILL WOOD FAIR WHITE

WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE

WINDOW CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE

BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR TAN

CEILING PLASTER FAIR WHITE

WINDOW SILL WOOD POOR WHITE

DOOR CASING METAL FAIR TAN

TRANSOM WOOD FAIR TAN

BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR WHITE

Exterior Building

DOOR WOOD FAIR GREY

DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR GREY

SCREEN DOOR WOOD POOR GREY

STAIR RAIL METAL FAIR GREY

CEILING WOOD FAIR GREY

SCUTTLE DOOR WOOD POOR GREY

SCUTTLE DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR GREY

FRIEZE BOARD WOOD FAIR GREY

FASCIA BOARD WOOD POOR GREY

SOFFIT WOOD POOR GREY

WINDOW CASING WOOD FAIR GREY

ATTIC VENT METAL FAIR GREY

EXTERIOR SILL WOOD POOR GREY

WINDOW CASING WOOD POOR GREY

WINDOW WOOD POOR GREY

The following Table 3 indicates that a total of forty-eight (48) of the building measurements tested positive, which confirmed the presence of lead at or above 0.3 mg/cm2. The complete XRF lead paint data, including negative measurements and calibration readings, have been provided in

Appendix B of this Report. Note that the XRF analyzer makes a final determination regarding if a building component is positive or negative for lead in paint. This analytical determination is

EDVHG�XSRQ�WKH�VWDQGDUG���0.3 mg/cm2), the measurement obtained, and the analytical range of the margin of error for the XRF analyzer. On occasion, a measurement obtained using this test method

(EPA method # 6200) that is slightly above or below the standard may effectively result in a positive or negative determination, due to the analyzer’s margin of error. Any measurements that are determined to be positive or negative for lead paint by the XRF analyzer, will be accepted as such, during this Survey. Any results to which this would apply would have been noted with an asterisk (*) in the “Results” column of Appendix B of this Report.

TABLE 3: POSITIVE XRF LEAD PAINT MEASUREMENTS

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2) Interior Building

5 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. A; N WALL; ENTRANCE 0.3 3

6 DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. A; N WALL; ENTRANCE 0.3 4.2

7 DOORWAY CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. A; E WALL; HALLWAY ENTRANCE 0.3 4

8 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE HALLWAY; N WALL; W ENTRANCE 0.3 2

9 DOOR WOOD FAIR TAN HALLWAY; N WALL; W ENTRANCE 0.3 3.9

13 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR WHITE HALLWAY; N WALL; E ENTRANCE 0.3 2.3

14 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR WHITE HALLWAY; E WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. B 0.3 2.1

15 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. B; N WALL; ENTRANCE 0.3 2.9

16 DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. B; N WALL; ENTRANCE 0.3 3

17 WINDOW WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. B; N WALL 0.3 3.7

20 WINDOW SILL WOOD FAIR WHITE STORAGE RM.; N WALL 0.3 3.3

26 WINDOW WOOD FAIR WHITE OFFICE B; E WALL 0.3 3.5

28 WINDOW SILL WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. B; S WALL 0.3 1.1

30 WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE RESTROOM B; E WALL 0.3 0.5

32 WINDOW CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RESTROOM B; S WALL 0.3 4.1

33 BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR TAN RM. B; W WALL 0.3 7.6

36 CEILING PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. A 0.3 0.6

37 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RESTROOM A; W WALL; ENTRANCE 0.3 2.8

38 DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE RESTROOM A; W WALL; ENTRANCE 0.3 5.3

39 WINDOW WOOD FAIR WHITE RESTROOM A; S WALL 0.3 4.1

40 WINDOW SILL WOOD POOR WHITE RM. A; S WALL 0.3 2.6

41 WINDOW WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. A; W WALL 0.3 4.3

45 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR TAN RM. A; W WALL; ENTRANCE TO OFFICE A 0.3 1.2

46 DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE OFFICE A; E WALL; ENTRANCE 0.3 4

47 TRANSOM WOOD FAIR TAN OFFICE A; E WALL; ABOVE DOOR 0.3 2.9

48 WINDOW CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE OFFICE A; W WALL 0.3 2.9

50 BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR WHITE OFFICE A; E WALL 0.3 2.3

Exterior Building

51 DOOR WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. A 0.3 10.7

52 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR GREY

PORCH; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO

HALLWAY 0.3 11.3

53 DOOR WOOD FAIR GREY

PORCH; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO

HALLWAY 0.3 11.7

54 SCREEN DOOR WOOD POOR GREY PORCH; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. B 0.3 12.8

55 DOOR WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. B 0.3 14.7

56 STAIR RAIL METAL FAIR GREY PORCH; NE STAIRS 0.3 3.6

57 CEILING WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH 0.3 9.7

58 SCUTTLE DOOR WOOD POOR GREY PORCH; CEILING 0.3 3.3

59 SCUTTLE DOOR

CASING WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH; CEILING 0.3 7.8

60 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH; S WALL 0.3 7.5

61 FASCIA BOARD WOOD POOR GREY N SIDE; E AREA 0.3 10.8

62 SOFFIT WOOD POOR GREY N SIDE; E AREA 0.3 11.6

63 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD POOR GREY N WALL; E AREA 0.3 11.4

64 WINDOW CASING WOOD FAIR GREY N WALL; E AREA 0.3 10.9

65 FASCIA BOARD WOOD POOR GREY E WALL; NE CORNER 0.3 12.7

66 ATTIC VENT METAL FAIR GREY E WALL; CENTER 0.3 5.6

67 EXTERIOR SILL WOOD POOR GREY E WALL; SE CORNER 0.3 10.1

68 EXTERIOR SILL WOOD POOR GREY S WALL; E AREA 0.3 0.6

71 WINDOW CASING WOOD POOR GREY S WALL; W AREA 0.3 12.9

73 WINDOW WOOD POOR GREY W WALL 0.3 0.8

74 WINDOW CASING WOOD POOR GREY N WALL; W AREA 0.3 13.7

QUALIFICATIONS

This Comprehensive Lead Paint Survey was performed by an Inspector that was qualified to perform work in Texas, per the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), and in New

Mexico per USEPA certification credentials. This individual has received training under the HUD

/ EPA training criteria for the required Lead Paint Inspector and/or Risk Assessor courses and has received the refresher training within the prescribed period for each jurisdiction. Company and individual licenses and credentials have been provided and are available for review in the project sampling plan documents, which have been submitted to the USACE.

LIMITATIONS

The overall purpose of this Comprehensive Lead Paint Survey was to identify if lead-containing components were present, within the qualifications and limitations summarized below. Reliance on this Report is specifically limited to gathering initial information regarding the presence of lead in paint. Any time that lead-based paint may be identified during the performance of a lead inspection, the owner of the building is responsible to the occupants and to the public to properly manage these materials, per Local, State and Federal regulations. Prior to the abatement or removal of any lead containing materials, a Lead Project Design should be properly performed, by a qualified Lead Firm, to 1) ensure that materials will be properly managed, and 2) to prepare a more accurate estimate of actual materials to be addressed. This Survey Report was specifically prepared for ALL Consulting’s Client (USACE and Ft. Bliss), and the extent of liability incurred, is limited to the amount of the Report Fee paid by its Client. The USACE agrees that the ALL

Consulting Team cannot be held responsible for any liability based on reliance of this Report by any third party.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Specific Conclusions. Lead-containing paint was found on components either inside and / or outside of this building.

• Lead paint should not be disturbed without proper procedures in place. Should the lead paint need to be disturbed, personnel should be evacuated in advance, and only properly trained persons with adequate PPE should be allowed to disturb the lead paint material.

• Lead painted components in poor condition should be stabilized with interim controls or abatement procedures by properly trained personnel.

• Lead hazard air monitoring should be performed during abatement activities.

• Following abatement activities, clearance wipe samples should be collected and sent to an approved laboratory for lead paint analysis.

• The OSHA Hazard Communication Standard and the Lead Paint Standard both require anyone working in such areas to be informed of lead paint hazards and methods to avoid the hazards.

2. General Conclusions. Proper notification should be made to the appropriate authorities prior to disturbance of any lead-containing materials, including abatement activity, renovations, or operations and maintenance (O&M) activities, or demolition of any facilities or public buildings.

Other personnel working in the area must be alerted by signage and the appropriate regulated area designations. OSHA specifies worker protection and engineering controls, as well as work practices to ensure the safety of workers and anyone who will be in the area after the conclusion of the work.

Contact the personnel listed below with any clarifications that may be needed.

Inspected by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

Tim Jones, RPIH Alex Woelper, P.E., RPIH David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Lead Inspector Environmental Consultant Project Manager ENCON International, Inc. ENCON International, Inc. ALL Consulting, LLC License # 2070306

APPENDICES:

A. Lead Paint Measurement Location Drawing(s) B. XRF Lead Paint Data

APPENDIX A

Lead Paint Measurement Location Drawing(s)

Draw by: JA

N

NOT TO SCALE

Project: # 139-14

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Sheet

ENV-1

Lead Paint Measurement Locations - Floor Plan

Date:

10-22-2015

Location:

Building # 629 Fort Bliss, TX

## Positive Lead Paint Measurement Locations

Office A

Room A

Restroom A

Closet A

Restroom B

Closet B

Storage Room

Office B

Room B

7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

05 06

09 08 13 14 16 17 2015

51 52

59 57

60 61

APPENDIX B

XRF Lead Paint Data

Note that the XRF analyzer makes a final determination regarding if a building component is positive or negative for lead in paint. This analytical determination is based upon the standard (≥0.3 mg/cm2), the measurement obtained, and the analytical range of the margin of error for the XRF analyzer. On occasion, a measurement obtained using this test method (EPA method # 6200) that is above or below the standard may effectively result in a negative or positive determination, due to the analyzer’s margin of error. Any measurements that are determined to be negative or positive for lead paint by the XRF analyzer, will be accepted as such, for this Survey. Any results that apply to this situation will be noted with an asterisk (*) in the table to follow.

Ft. Bliss, Texas XRF Lead Paint Data Bldg. 629

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Results Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

1 SHUTTER_CAL 4.57

2 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1.2

3 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.9

4 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1.2

5 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. A; N WALL; ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 3 6 DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. A; N WALL; ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 4.2 7 DOORWAY CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. A; E WALL; HALLWAY ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 4 8 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE HALLWAY; N WALL; W ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 2 9 DOOR WOOD FAIR TAN HALLWAY; N WALL; W ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 3.9

10 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE HALLWAY; S WALL; CLOSET A ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 11 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE CLOSET A; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.03 12 DOORWAY HEADER CONCRETE FAIR WHITE HALLWAY; CEILING Negative 0.3 0 13 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR WHITE HALLWAY; N WALL; E ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 2.3 14 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR WHITE HALLWAY; E WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. B Positive 0.3 2.1 15 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. B; N WALL; ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 2.9 16 DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. B; N WALL; ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 3 17 WINDOW WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. B; N WALL Positive 0.3 3.7 18 WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE RM. B; E WALL; N AREA Negative 0.3 0.02 19 CEILING PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. B Negative 0.3 0.03 20 WINDOW SILL WOOD FAIR WHITE STORAGE RM.; N WALL Positive 0.3 3.3 21 WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE STORAGE RM.; E WALL Null 0.3 0.03 22 WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE STORAGE RM.; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.03 23 SHELVES WOOD FAIR WHITE STORAGE RM.; S WALL Negative 0.3 0 24 CLOSET CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE OFFICE B; N WALL; CLOSET ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 25 WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE OFFICE B; CLOSET; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.04 26 WINDOW WOOD FAIR WHITE OFFICE B; E WALL Positive 0.3 3.5 27 DOORWAY CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE OFFICE B; W WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. B Negative 0.3 0 28 WINDOW SILL WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. B; S WALL Positive 0.3 1.1 29 BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR TAN RM. B; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.02 30 WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE RESTROOM B; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.5

Interior Building

09/25/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 1

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

31 DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE RESTROOM B; E WALL; ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0.06 32 WINDOW CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RESTROOM B; S WALL Positive 0.3 4.1 33 BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR TAN RM. B; W WALL Positive 0.3 7.6 34 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE CLOSET B; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.01 35 CEILING PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. A Null 0.3 0.12 36 CEILING PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. A Positive 0.3 0.6 37 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RESTROOM A; W WALL; ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 2.8 38 DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE RESTROOM A; W WALL; ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 5.3 39 WINDOW WOOD FAIR WHITE RESTROOM A; S WALL Positive 0.3 4.1 40 WINDOW SILL WOOD POOR WHITE RM. A; S WALL Positive 0.3 2.6 41 WINDOW WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. A; W WALL Positive 0.3 4.3 42 WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. A; N WALL; W AREA Null 0.3 0.4 43 WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. A; N WALL; W AREA Null 0.3 0.11 44 WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. A; N WALL; W AREA Negative 0.3 0.1 45 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR TAN RM. A; W WALL; ENTRANCE TO OFFICE A Positive 0.3 1.2 46 DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE OFFICE A; E WALL; ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 4 47 TRANSOM WOOD FAIR TAN OFFICE A; E WALL; ABOVE DOOR Positive 0.3 2.9 48 WINDOW CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE OFFICE A; W WALL Positive 0.3 2.9 49 WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE OFFICE A; N WALL Negative 0.3 0.1 50 BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR WHITE OFFICE A; E WALL Positive 0.3 2.3

51 DOOR WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. A Positive 0.3 10.7 52 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO HALLWAY Positive 0.3 11.3 53 DOOR WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO HALLWAY Positive 0.3 11.7 54 SCREEN DOOR WOOD POOR GREY PORCH; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. B Positive 0.3 12.8 55 DOOR WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. B Positive 0.3 14.7 56 STAIR RAIL METAL FAIR GREY PORCH; NE STAIRS Positive 0.3 3.6 57 CEILING WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH Positive 0.3 9.7 58 SCUTTLE DOOR WOOD POOR GREY PORCH; CEILING Positive 0.3 3.3 59 SCUTTLE DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH; CEILING Positive 0.3 7.8 60 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD FAIR GREY PORCH; S WALL Positive 0.3 7.5

Exterior Building

09/25/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 2

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

61 FASCIA BOARD WOOD POOR GREY N SIDE; E AREA Positive 0.3 10.8 62 SOFFIT WOOD POOR GREY N SIDE; E AREA Positive 0.3 11.6 63 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD POOR GREY N WALL; E AREA Positive 0.3 11.4 64 WINDOW CASING WOOD FAIR GREY N WALL; E AREA Positive 0.3 10.9 65 FASCIA BOARD WOOD POOR GREY E WALL; NE CORNER Positive 0.3 12.7 66 ATTIC VENT METAL FAIR GREY E WALL; CENTER Positive 0.3 5.6 67 EXTERIOR SILL WOOD POOR GREY E WALL; SE CORNER Positive 0.3 10.1 68 EXTERIOR SILL WOOD POOR GREY S WALL; E AREA Positive 0.3 0.6 69 A/C DUCT METAL POOR GREY S SIDE Negative 0.3 0.01 70 WINDOW BOARD WOOD POOR GREY S WALL Negative 0.3 0.02 71 WINDOW CASING WOOD POOR GREY S WALL; W AREA Positive 0.3 12.9 72 GAS PIPE METAL POOR GREY SW SIDE OF BUILDING Negative 0.3 0.01 73 WINDOW WOOD POOR GREY W WALL Positive 0.3 0.8 74 WINDOW CASING WOOD POOR GREY N WALL; W AREA Positive 0.3 13.7

75 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1.2

76 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1

77 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1

Null - Any result of "null" in the table above indicates that an inconclusive measurement was obtained with the XRF analyzer, and was therefore repeated in the same location until a measurement was obtained.

09/25/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 3

ATTACHMENT 2

Asbestos Survey Report

COMPREHENSIVE ASBESTOS SURVEY

BUILDING 629

FORT BLISS, TEXAS 79916

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Tulsa District

Prepared by:

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

ALL Consulting, LLC 1718 S. Cheyenne Ave.

Tulsa, OK 74119

Inspection Start Date:

September 28, 2015

ENCON International, Inc.

7307 Remcon Circle, #103

El Paso, TX 79912

COMPREHENSIVE ASBESTOS SURVEY

Ft. Bliss, Bldg. 629

PURPOSE

The ALL Consulting Team was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Tulsa

District, to perform comprehensive Hazardous Building Materials Surveys to identify the presence of any asbestos or lead paint at a number of buildings at Ft. Bliss, Texas. This project also included the development and population of a database to store the survey reports for access by the Ft. Bliss

Directorate of Public Works (DPW), and others. The buildings that are included within this contract scope of work include buildings at McGregor Base Camp and Doña Ana Base Camp within the New Mexico portion of Ft. Bliss, in addition to the Ft. Bliss buildings within Texas.

BACKGROUND

Ft. Bliss has a large number of buildings constructed before 1990 when the use of asbestos and lead paint was prevalent in construction of buildings. Because these materials may still exist within these buildings, Ft. Bliss is required to identify (asbestos or lead containing materials), assess the condition (stable or deteriorating), determine the nature of building materials (i.e., drywall or floor tile), and the extent of these hazardous substances. In accordance with the Clean Air Act (40 CFR

61 Subpart M, Asbestos), any renovation, remodeling or demolition of any structure, (i.e., buildings, facilities, etc.), shall be surveyed for asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and properly abated prior to any disturbance of the material.

INTRODUCTION

The buildings selected for this project were provided to the ALL Consulting Team by USACE, Tulsa District. The selected buildings were located in four (4) geographic areas: Ft. Bliss main post, Biggs Field (now known as East Bliss), McGregor Base Camp, NM, and Doña Ana Base

Camp, NM. Records were available for some of these buildings where previous partial or complete inspections had been performed. When available, prior asbestos reports were referenced to enhance the thoroughness of the asbestos inspection performed for this building. The goal of this project was to provide a comprehensive inspection of the designated facilities, but destructive sampling was not authorized. Therefore, on rare occasion some ACMs may be hidden behind walls, under subfloors, or located in other areas that were inaccessible to the inspector. If or when any building is to undergo future demolition, an additional investigation may be undertaken in which destructive sampling is authorized.

REGULATORY STANDARDS

Asbestos in building materials is regulated on the federal level by the Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). On the state level, Texas also has regulations pertaining to sampling and abatement of asbestos in buildings.

The inspection was conducted to ensure compliance with National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) – 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, which states that “prior to the commencement of the demolition or renovation, thoroughly inspect the affected facility or part of the facility where the demolition or renovation operation(s) will occur for the presence of asbestos, including Category I and Category II non-friable ACM.” Regulated asbestos containing materials have been designated as RACM. Asbestos Inspectors for both Texas and New Mexico facilities were trained under the EPA AHERA (40 CFR 763) standards. For buildings in the State of Texas, the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) were complied with, which specify inspector licensure and a minimum of three (3) samples for each homogeneous area. In New

Mexico, facilities were sampled under the applicable regulations from the EPA, 40 CFR 61.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

Building 629 was constructed in 1934, and was in use at the time of inspection. Its previous use was listed as an “administrative building.” A description of this building is presented in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 – BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Items Description Area of building 1,870 square feet Date of Construction 1934 Number of floors One (1) floor Exterior wall materials Brick Roof type Pitched Roof material Shingles Interior walls Brick, drywall, plaster, concrete, ceramic tiles Interior floors Concrete Interior floor coverings Carpet, sheet vinyl, floor tile under carpet Ceilings Plaster Notes:

FUNCTIONAL AREAS

Functional areas were areas (or groups of areas), within a structure or building that were constructed to have the same use or purpose, constructed of the same materials, and were relatively the same age. A general administrative area, or several identical buildings within a facility, could typically be considered a single functional area.

The functional area(s), or purpose, of this facility was identified as follows:

“Administrative offices”

HOMOGENEOUS AREAS

Within functional areas, homogeneous areas were determined. Homogeneous Areas are areas of surfacing material, thermal system insulation (TSI), or miscellaneous materials that were uniform in color, texture, substrate, and were relatively of the same age. Table 2 below lists the homogeneous areas and the general locations where they were identified.

TABLE 2 - Homogeneous Areas and Locations Identified

# Homogeneous Areas (Suspect Materials) Location

1 Exterior window caulking Throughout building 2 Exterior window glazing Throughout building 3 Pipe wrap E wall only 4 Duct caulking S wall only 5 Window board caulking S wall only 6 Door caulking N wall only 7 Carpet mastic & leveling compound Room A, closet, hallways

8 Drywall joint compound Throughout the building’s interior walls (except for closet partition)

9 Texture on plaster (ceiling/wall) Throughout the building (except for drywall) 10 Sheet vinyl floor covering Restrooms 11 Roof shingles Roof 12 Caulking at freizeboard Throughout building (except W wall) 13 Floor expansion joint N side of building 14 Tile under carpet and mastic Room B, office A, storage room, office B 15 Caulking at baseboard and concrete wall Storage room, office B perimeter walls 16 Caulking at fixtures Restrooms 17 Caulking at air vents (ceiling) Throughout building

SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

The building materials survey tasks were performed in accordance with the Final Hazardous

Building Materials Surveys, Sampling Plan, Fort Bliss, Texas, December 2014, prepared by ALL

Consulting and ENCON International, Inc. A visual inspection of the building was conducted to develop a sampling strategy. This task included determining both functional areas and homogeneous areas / materials, as well as sample collection locations. Friability was assessed by manually manipulating the suspect asbestos materials utilizing hand pressure to determine if the materials, when dry, could be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder. Seventeen (17) homogeneous areas were established and at least three (3) samples were collected from each area to adequately identify accessible asbestos in the building. Portions of the subject building that had suspect asbestos-containing surfacing, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous materials were divided into homogeneous areas for sampling. These samples were each uniquely and individually identified and logged into a chain of custody document and prepared for shipment to a third-party, independent laboratory for analysis. Building materials that were not considered suspect ACM included the following; concrete, metal, glass, asphalt, plastic, and wood. Destructive sampling was not authorized or performed to locate hidden or inaccessible materials.

Fifty-one (51) samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis. Bulk sample analyses were conducted utilizing polarized light microscopy (PLM), as per EPA Test Method 600/R-

93/116. This method separates the sample material into various layers based on their morphology, and then identifies the presence of the different asbestos fibers in each of these layers when detected. The analysis was performed by Apex Precision Analytical Services, Inc., located in

Friendswood, TX. ACM is defined as a material that contains greater than 1% of any asbestos type including Chrysotile, Amosite, Crocidolite, Tremolite, Anthophyllite, and Actinolite, or combinations of these materials. Asbestos materials were determined as recommended in the July

1993 EPA/600/R-93/116 document titled, "Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk

Building Materials." Copies of the asbestos laboratory test results and related laboratory documentation have been provided in Appendix B of this Report.

LABORATORY ANALYSIS

The sample collection and subsequent laboratory analysis indicated that asbestos was identified in the building material listed below. The NESHAPS definitions were used to define the condition of ACMs, per 40 CFR 61, Subpart M.

The quantities provided above are rough estimates only and must be field verified by any future abatement contractors.

QUALIFICATIONS

This Comprehensive Asbestos Survey was performed by Inspector Tim Jones on September 28, 2015 and was conducted in accordance with the EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous

Air Pollutants (NESHAP): 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. Sampling protocols were performed in accordance with the TAHPR. The Inspector has received training under the AHERA required

Inspector Course and has received annual refresher training within the past year.

LIMITATIONS

The overall purpose of this Comprehensive Asbestos Survey was to identify if ACM was present, within the qualifications and limitations summarized below. Reliance on this report is specifically limited to gathering initial information regarding the presence of asbestos in building materials.

Any time that ACMs may be identified during the performance of an asbestos survey, the owner of the building is responsible to the occupants and to the public to manage these materials properly, per Local, State and Federal regulations. Prior to the abatement or removal of any ACMs, an asbestos project design should be properly created, by a qualified asbestos consulting firm, 1) to ensure that materials will be properly managed, and 2) to prepare a more accurate estimate of materials to be abated. This Survey Report was specifically prepared for ALL Consulting’s Client

(USACE and Ft. Bliss), and the extent of liability incurred, is limited to the amount of the report fee paid by its Client. The USACE agrees that the ALL Consulting Team cannot be held responsible for any liability based on reliance of this report by any third party for any business reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The ALL Consulting Team was retained by the USACE to perform a Comprehensive

Asbestos Survey at the subject building located within Ft. Bliss.

TABLE 3 – Identified Asbestos Containing Materials (> 1%) Sample

No. Asbestos Containing Materials Approx.

Qty. Location

Condition (friable, cat, damaged)

16-18 Door caulking 72 LF N wall only Cat. I, Non-friable

40-42 Tile under carpet and mastic 1580 SF Room B, office A, storage room, office B Cat. I, Non-friable

2. The survey for the subject building was successfully completed, as required, per State and

Federal environmental standards. Refer to Table 1 for building details.

3. One (1) functional area was identified for this building.

4. Suspect ACMs were potentially identified in seventeen (17) homogeneous areas at the subject building. Refer to Table 2 for a listing of homogeneous areas.

5. A total of fifty-one (51) suspect ACM samples were collected from either the building interior, building exterior, or the roof, and were properly analyzed by an independent, qualified third-party laboratory. Refer to the Appendices for details regarding sample locations and descriptions.

6. A review of the laboratory test results indicated that ACMs were identified at the subject building. Refer to Table 3 for a listing of any identified ACMs

7. ACMs were identified in two (2) homogeneous areas at the subject building. Refer to the

Appendices for details regarding positive sample locations and descriptions.

8. Ft. Bliss is responsible for properly managing the ACMs at the subject building.

9. Prior to any renovation or demolition activities, asbestos related activities will need to be performed by properly licensed personnel. ACMs should not be disturbed by unlicensed and / or untrained personnel.

10. In the unlikely event that additional “hidden suspect ACMs” are encountered during any future renovation or demolition activities, then further sampling and lab analysis will be required. Ft. Bliss DPW personnel should be notified immediately for public safety and environmental compliance actions to properly manage any confirmed additional

ACMs.

11. Any Asbestos Project Designs must be prepared by a Texas licensed Asbestos Consulting

Firm.

12. Proper 10-day advance NESHAP notification should be made to the appropriate authorities prior to disturbance of any ACMs. Such disturbance includes abatement activities, building renovations, routine operation & maintenance activities, or any planned demolition in facilities or public buildings.

13. If disturbance of ACMs is anticipated, then these materials shall be properly removed in advance by licensed and trained personnel, as required by State and Federal regulations.

14. Abatement activities should be performed by a licensed Asbestos Abatement Contractor, with project management and air monitoring support by a licensed Asbestos Consulting

Firm.

Contact the personnel listed below with any clarifications that may be needed.

Inspected by: Reviewed by: Reviewed by:

Tim Jones, RPIH Alex Woelper, P.E., RPIH David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Asbestos Inspector Environmental Consultant Project Manager ENCON International, Inc. ENCON International, Inc. ALL Consulting, LLC License #10-5575

APPENDICES:

A. Asbestos Drawing(s) B. Laboratory Documentation

APPENDIX A

Asbestos Drawing(s)

7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Draw by: JA

N

NOT TO SCALE

Project: # 139-14

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

Date:

10-02-2015

Location:

Building # 629 Fort Bliss, TX

Asbestos Sample Location Drawing - Floor Plan

## Asbestos Sample Locations

Positive Asbestos Sample Locations

Office A

Room A Restroom A

Closet A

Restroom B

Closet B

Storage Room

Office B

Room B

03 04

07 - 09

10, 11 1213 14, 15

161817

31 (Roof)

32 (Roof)

33 (Roof)

34 35

37 38 39

41 42

43 44

47 48

7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Draw by: JA

N

NOT TO SCALE

Project: # 139-14

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

Date:

10-20-2015

Location:

Building # 629 Fort Bliss, TX

Tile Under Carpet and Mastic

Door Caulking

Office A

Room A

Restroom A

Closet A

Restroom B

Closet B

Storage Room

Office B

Room B

Asbestos Homogeneous Areas - Floor Plan

APPENDIX B

Laboratory Documentation

An Independent Laboratory Providing Reliable Analysis with Professionalism and Honesty

306 W. Edgewood Dr., Suite D, Friendswood, TX 77546 www.apasi.net Office (281) 648-9918 │Fax (281) 648-9595

ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSIS REPORT

Date: October 1, 2015

ENCON International

Report: 5015-3396 139-14 / Fort Bliss – Bldg, 629

Gary R. Simmons Laboratory Manager

Lab Comments on Project: N/A

This document shall be considered a duly signed original report of the results obtained from the analyses performed. All analyses are done within government guidelines and regulations.

306 W. Edgewood Dr., Suite D, Friendswood, TX 77546 www.apasi.net Office (281) 648-9918 │Fax (281) 648-9595

Analytical results and reports are generated by Apex Precision Analytical Services at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Result, reports or copies of same will not be released by Apex Precision Analytical Services to any third party without the written request from client. These results only repesent the materials submitted. Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report cannot be used to represent conditions at any other location, date or time and does not imply that this space is free from these or any other contaminants. No responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which these results are used or interpreted. This must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any government agency of the United States. Apex Precision Analytical Services reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

NVLAP Lab Code: 200633-0 PLM TDSHS Asbestos License#: 30-0312 PLM/PCM

PLM (Bulk) - Asbestos Analysis Report - Visual ID (EPA Method 600/R-93-116 Visual Area Estimation)

ENCON International Report Number: 5015-3396 7307 Remcon Circle, Suite 100 Report Date: October 1, 2015 El Paso, TX 79912 Samples Collected: September 28, 2015 915-833-3740 Date Received: September 30, 2015 Contact: Tim Jones Turn-around time: 24 Hours

Job ID / Site: 139-14 / Fort Bliss – Bldg, 629

Matrix Client Sample

Number

Lab Sample Number (by layer)

Color / Description / Fibrous / NonFibrous / Homogeneity

Asbestos Content Type & %

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Type & %

01 5015-3396-01 None Detected None Detected Binder

02 5015-3396-02 None Detected None Detected Binder

03 5015-3396-03 None Detected None Detected Binder

04 5015-3396-04 None Detected None Detected Binder

05 5015-3396-05 None Detected None Detected Binder

06 5015-3396-06 None Detected None Detected Binder

07 5015-3396-07 None Detected Cellulose 2% Binder

08 5015-3396-08 None Detected Cellulose 2% Binder

09 5015-3396-09 None Detected Cellulose 2% Binder

10 5015-3396-10 None Detected None Detected Binder

Grey,White / Window Caulking / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

Grey,White / Window Caulking / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

Grey,White / Window Caulking / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

White / Window Glazing / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

White / Window Glazing / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

White / Window Glazing / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

Black / Pipe Wrap / Fibrous / Homogeneous

Black / Pipe Wrap / Fibrous / Homogeneous

Black / Pipe Wrap / Fibrous / Homogeneous

White / Caulking / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

306 W. Edgewood Dr., Suite D, Friendswood, TX 77546 www.apasi.net Office (281) 648-9918 │Fax (281) 648-9595

Analytical results and reports are generated by Apex Precision Analytical Services at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Result, reports or copies of same will not be released by Apex Precision Analytical Services to any third party without the written request from client. These results only repesent the materials submitted. Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report cannot be used to represent conditions at any other location, date or time and does not imply that this space is free from these or any other contaminants. No responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which these results are used or interpreted. This must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any government agency of the United States. Apex Precision Analytical Services reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

NVLAP Lab Code: 200633-0 PLM TDSHS Asbestos License#: 30-0312 PLM/PCM

PLM (Bulk) - Asbestos Analysis Report - Visual ID (EPA Method 600/R-93-116 Visual Area Estimation)

ENCON International Report Number: 5015-3396 7307 Remcon Circle, Suite 100 Report Date: October 1, 2015 El Paso, TX 79912 Samples Collected: September 28, 2015 915-833-3740 Date Received: September 30, 2015 Contact: Tim Jones Turn-around time: 24 Hours

Job ID / Site: 139-14 / Fort Bliss – Bldg, 629

Matrix Client Sample

Number

Lab Sample Number (by layer)

Color / Description / Fibrous / NonFibrous / Homogeneity

Asbestos Content Type & %

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Type & %

11 5015-3396-11 None Detected None Detected Binder

12 5015-3396-12 None Detected None Detected Binder

13 5015-3396-13 None Detected Synthetic 3% Binder

14 5015-3396-14 None Detected Synthetic 3% Binder

15 5015-3396-15 None Detected Synthetic 3% Binder

16 5015-3396-16 Chrysotile 5% None Detected Binder

17 5015-3396-17 Chrysotile 5% None Detected Binder

18 5015-3396-18 Chrysotile 5% None Detected Binder

19 5015-3396-19A None Detected Binder

5015-3396-19B None Detected None Detected Binder

White / Caulking / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

White / Caulking / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

White / Caulking / Fibrous / Homogeneous

White / Caulking / Fibrous / Homogeneous

White / Caulking / Fibrous / Homogeneous

Tan / Door Caulking / Fibrous / Homogeneous

Tan / Door Caulking / Fibrous / Homogeneous

Tan / Door Caulking / Fibrous / Homogeneous

Yellow / Flooring / Fibrous / Homogeneous Cellulose Fibrous Glass

15% 5%

Yellow / Mastic / NonFibrous /

306 W. Edgewood Dr., Suite D, Friendswood, TX 77546 www.apasi.net Office (281) 648-9918 │Fax (281) 648-9595

Analytical results and reports are generated by Apex Precision Analytical Services at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Result, reports or copies of same will not be released by Apex Precision Analytical Services to any third party without the written request from client. These results only repesent the materials submitted. Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report cannot be used to represent conditions at any other location, date or time and does not imply that this space is free from these or any other contaminants. No responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which these results are used or interpreted. This must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any government agency of the United States. Apex Precision Analytical Services reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

NVLAP Lab Code: 200633-0 PLM TDSHS Asbestos License#: 30-0312 PLM/PCM

PLM (Bulk) - Asbestos Analysis Report - Visual ID (EPA Method 600/R-93-116 Visual Area Estimation)

ENCON International Report Number: 5015-3396 7307 Remcon Circle, Suite 100 Report Date: October 1, 2015 El Paso, TX 79912 Samples Collected: September 28, 2015 915-833-3740 Date Received: September 30, 2015 Contact: Tim Jones Turn-around time: 24 Hours

Job ID / Site: 139-14 / Fort Bliss – Bldg, 629

Matrix Client Sample

Number

Lab Sample Number (by layer)

Color / Description / Fibrous / NonFibrous / Homogeneity

Asbestos Content Type & %

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Type & %

20 5015-3396-20A Green / Carpet / Fibrous / Homogeneous None Detected Synthetic 95% Binder

5015-3396-20B None Detected None Detected Binder

21 5015-3396-21A None Detected None Detected Binder

5015-3396-21B None Detected None Detected Binder

22 5015-3396-22A None Detected None Detected Binder

5015-3396-22B None Detected Cellulose 10% Binder

23 5015-3396-23A None Detected None Detected Binder

5015-3396-23B None Detected Cellulose 95% Binder

24 5015-3396-24A None Detected None Detected Binder

5015-3396-24B None Detected Binder

Yellow / Carpet Mastic / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

Yellow / Carpet Mastic / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

White / Leveling Compound / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

White / Paint / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

Brown,White / Drywall / Fibrous / Homogeneous

White / Texture,Joint Compound / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

Off White / Joint Tape / Fibrous / Homogeneous

White / Paint,Texture / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

Brown,White / Drywall / Fibrous / Homogeneous

Cellulose Fibrous Glass

10% 2%

306 W. Edgewood Dr., Suite D, Friendswood, TX 77546 www.apasi.net Office (281) 648-9918 │Fax (281) 648-9595

Analytical results and reports are generated by Apex Precision Analytical Services at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Result, reports or copies of same will not be released by Apex Precision Analytical Services to any third party without the written request from client. These results only repesent the materials submitted. Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report cannot be used to represent conditions at any other location, date or time and does not imply that this space is free from these or any other contaminants. No responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which these results are used or interpreted. This must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any government agency of the United States. Apex Precision Analytical Services reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

NVLAP Lab Code: 200633-0 PLM TDSHS Asbestos License#: 30-0312 PLM/PCM

PLM (Bulk) - Asbestos Analysis Report - Visual ID (EPA Method 600/R-93-116 Visual Area Estimation)

ENCON International Report Number: 5015-3396 7307 Remcon Circle, Suite 100 Report Date: October 1, 2015 El Paso, TX 79912 Samples Collected: September 28, 2015 915-833-3740 Date Received: September 30, 2015 Contact: Tim Jones Turn-around time: 24 Hours

Job ID / Site: 139-14 / Fort Bliss – Bldg, 629

Matrix Client Sample

Number

Lab Sample Number (by layer)

Color / Description / Fibrous / NonFibrous / Homogeneity

Asbestos Content Type & %

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Type & %

25 5015-3396-25 None Detected None Detected Binder

26 5015-3396-26 None Detected None Detected Binder

27 5015-3396-27 None Detected None Detected Binder

28 5015-3396-28 Grey / Flooring / Fibrous / Homogeneous None Detected Binder

29 5015-3396-29 Grey / Flooring / Fibrous / Homogeneous None Detected Binder

30 5015-3396-30 Grey / Flooring / Fibrous / Homogeneous None Detected Binder

31 5015-3396-31 None Detected Fibrous Glass 10% Binder

32 5015-3396-32 None Detected Fibrous Glass 10% Binder

33 5015-3396-33 None Detected Fibrous Glass 10% Binder

34 5015-3396-34 None Detected None Detected Binder

White,Off White / Texture,Plaster / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

White,Off White / Texture,Plaster / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

White,Off White / Texture,Plaster / NonFibrous / Homogeneous

Cellulose Fibrous Glass

15% 5%

Cellulose Fibrous Glass

15% 5%

Cellulose Fibrous Glass

15% 5%

Black / Roofing Shingle / Fibrous / Homogeneous

Black / Roofing Shingle / Fibrous / Homogeneous

Black / Roofing Shingle / Fibrous / Homogeneous

306 W. Edgewood Dr., Suite D, Friendswood, TX 77546 www.apasi.net Office (281) 648-9918 │Fax (281) 648-9595

Analytical results and reports are generated by Apex Precision Analytical Services at the request of and for the exclusive…