Appendices.pdf

PDF 5 MB Posted Jul 27, 2018

Attached to: 761/18238. SAR-Cottage Grove & Madison-Cont. Soil Removal
Solicitation number: RFQ-171-180000000764-2
Issued by: Kent County, Michigan

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Feb 27, 2025

This is an appendices document containing glossary terms, boring logs, and hazardous materials procedures for a construction project at Cottage Grove and Madison in Grand Rapids, Michigan, overseen by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and Department of Technology, Management and Budget (DTMB). The boring logs indicate soil sampling was conducted on June 7, 2018 to a depth of 25 feet, revealing layers of asphalt, sand, and silty sand. The project includes specifications for handling hazardous materials and waste removal procedures.

The document outlines environmental and safety protocols, including requirements for handling hazardous materials in accordance with federal, state and local laws. It specifies that contractors must contact the Air Quality Division of the Department of Environmental Quality for permits related to asbestos removal. The boring logs reveal groundwater at 24 feet and detail soil composition including asphalt, fine to coarse sand, and silty sand layers with occasional brick pieces and slag. No odors or staining were observed during sampling.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Addendum 1 18238.pdf	PDF	Jul 27, 2018
DTMB-0415 (Advertisment).pdf	PDF	Jul 27, 2018
DCSpec.pdf	PDF	Jul 27, 2018
Drawings.pdf	PDF	Jul 27, 2018

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

APPENDIX I

GLOSSARY

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

GLOSSARY

ActivityAn element in the Progress Schedule establishing a requisite step, or the time and resources required, for completing the part of the Work associated with that Activity.

AddendaWritten instruments that are used by the Owner and/or Professional to incorporate interpretations or clarifications, modifications and other information into the Bidding Documents. An Addendum issued after Bid opening to those Bidders who actually submitted a Bid, for the purpose of re-bidding the Work without re-advertising, is referred to as a post-Bid Addendum.

Agency- Any unit, section, division, department or other instrumentality of the State that benefits from the Work.

AlternateRefers to work specified in the Bidding Documents for which the Bidder must bid a Bid Price.

Apparent Low Bidders: Those Bidders whose Base Bid, when added to those specific Alternates the Owner intends to accept, yields the three lowest sums of Bid and Alternates. Additional Bidders may be considered Apparent Low Bidders if their Bid, when added to those specific Alternates the Owner intends to accept, yields a sum within 10% of the lowest of the Apparent Low Bidder’s sum. If a qualified disabled veteran meets the requirements of the contract solicitation, provides acceptable responses to both Part One and Part Two of the Best Value Construction Bidder Evaluation to achieve a Best Value recommendation and with the veteran’s preference is the lowest responsive, responsible, best value Bidder it is considered the Apparent Low Bidder.

Archaeological FeatureAny prehistoric or historic deposit of archaeological value, as determined by a representative of a State agency that is duly authorized to evaluate such findings and render such judgments. An Archaeological Feature deposit may include, but is not limited to Indian habitations, ceremonial sites, abandoned settlements, treasure trove, artifacts or other objects with intrinsic archaeological value and that relate to the history and culture of the State of Michigan. The Archaeological Features are listed under Section 00800 Supplementary Conditions.

Authorized Technical DataInformation and data contained in a report of exploration and tests of subsurface conditions. Also, any physical data (dimension, location, conditions, etc.) contained in those Drawings of physical conditions of existing surface and subsurface facilities.

Best Value-The bids will be evaluated for best value based on price and qualitative components that may include but are not limited to technical design, technical approach, quality of proposed personnel, and management plans, per PA 430 of 2012.

BidWritten offer by a Bidder for the Work, as specified, which designates the Bidder’s Base Bid and Bid Prices for all Alternates.

The term Bid includes a re-bid.

BidderThe Person acting directly, or through an authorized representative, who submits a Bid directly to the Owner.

Bidding DocumentsThe proposed Contract Documents as advertised, and all Addenda issued before execution of the Contract.

Bid Price The Bidder’s price for a lump sum item of work, or the product of the Bidder’s unit price for an item of Unit Price Work times the quantity given on the Bid Form for that item.

Bid SecuritySecurity serving as a guarantee that the Bidder will conform to all conditions.

Bidding RequirementsThe Advertisement, Instructions to Bidders, Supplementary Instructions, Information for Bidders, Bid Form, Bid Form Attachments and qualification submittals, as advertised and as modified by Addenda, and any other Section included within Division 0 of the Bidding Documents for the purpose of governing bidding and award of the Contract.

BoardThe Administrative Board of the State of Michigan.

Bond Security furnished by the Contractor, as required by the Contract Documents.

Business DayAny Day except Saturdays, Sundays and holidays observed by the Owner.

BulletinA request used by the Owner to describe a change in the Work under consideration by the Owner and to request the Contractor to submit a proposal for the corresponding adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time, if any.

Calendar DayEvery day shown on the calendar, Saturdays, Sundays and holidays included.

Cash AllowanceAn Owner-specified sum included within the Contract Price to reimburse the Contractor for the actual purchase/furnished cost of materials and/or equipment or other designated items, as specifically provided in the Contract Documents.

Although the scope (e.g., the required quantity) of any Work covered by a Cash Allowance is sufficiently detailed in the Contract

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

Documents for the purposes of bidding the required labor costs, Subcontract costs, construction equipment costs and general conditions costs and Fee, it is understood that the required materials, equipment or other designated items are of uncertain purchase cost at the time of Bid or are yet to be specified in more detail by the Professional as to quality, appearance, durability, finish and such other necessary features affecting purchase price.

Change OrderA written order issued and signed by the Owner, which amends the Contract Documents for changes in the Work or an adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time, or both.

Contract AwardThe official action of the Board, the Director-SFA or the Director-DCD awarding the Contract to the Contractor.

Contract DocumentsWritten and graphic documents that form the legal agreement between the Owner and the Contractor, consisting of this document, completed Bid and Contract forms, terms and conditions of the contract, specifications, drawings, addenda, Notice of Award, Notice-to-Proceed and contract change orders.

Contract PriceThe total compensation, including authorized adjustments, payable by the Owner to the Contractor (subject to provisions for Unit Price Work).

Contract TimesThe Contract Times for the entire Work are the periods allowed, including authorized adjustments, for Substantial Completion and final completion of the Work. The Contract Times for a designated portion of the Work are the periods allowed for Substantial Completion and final completion of any such portion of the Work, as specified in the Contract Documents.

ContractorBusiness enterprise with which the Owner has entered into the Contract.

Correction PeriodPeriod during which the Contractor must, in accordance with the Contract Documents, (a) correct or, if rejected, remove and replace Defective Work, and (b) maintain warranties for materials and equipment in full force and effect.

Cost of the Work InvolvedThe sum of all costs that would be, or actually were, necessarily incurred by the Contractor in providing any Work Involved with the related change, less the costs that would be, or would have been, incurred by the Contractor to provide such Work without the related change.

DefectiveAs determined by the Professional, an adjective which when referring to or when applied to the term “Work” refers to (a) Work not conforming to the Contract Documents or not meeting the requirements of an inspection, test or approval, or (b) Work itemized in a Punch List which the Contractor fails to complete or correct within a reasonable time after issuance of the Punch List by the Professional.

DelayAny act or omission or other event that in any manner adversely affects or alters the schedule, progress or completion of all or any part of the Work. Delay is a generic term intended to include deferral, stoppage, slow down, interruption and extended performance, and all related hindrance, rescheduling, disruption, interference, inefficiency and productivity and production losses.

Department (DTMB)Department of Technology, Management and Budget of the State of Michigan.

Director is the Director of the Department.

Director-SFA is the Director of DTMB State Facilities Administration.

Director-DCD is the Director of DTMB State Facilities Administration, Design and Construction Division.

DivisionEach of the numbered, distinct parts (starting with Division 0) into which the Specifications are divided.

DrawingsPart of the Contract Documents showing the Work. Drawings must neither serve nor be used as Shop Drawings.

EmergencyA condition affecting the safety or protection of persons, or the Work, or property at or adjacent to the site.

State Facilities Administration (SFA)-Entity in the Department responsible for design, construction, and operations and maintenance of facilities.

Fee for the Work Involved (Fee)An established, percentage mark-up on the Cost of the Work Involved which is allowed to the Contractor for (a) reasonable administrative costs, and (b) negotiated, reasonable profit on the Cost of the Work Involved.

Hazardous MaterialAsbestos containing materials (ACMs), Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), petroleum products, such construction materials as paint thinners, solvents, gasoline, oil, etc., and any other like material the manufacture, use, treatment, storage, transportation or disposal of which is regulated by federal, State or local Laws governing the protection of public health, natural resources or the environment.

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

Invitation To Bid (ITB) -The solicitation document presenting the terms and conditions that will become part of the Contract when the Bid is accepted.

Law(s)Means federal, State and local statutes, ordinances, orders, rules and/or regulations.

MCLThe Michigan Compiled Laws of the State of Michigan.

Means and MethodsIncludes means, methods, techniques, sequences and/or procedures applicable to the Work.

Notice of AwardWritten notice accepting the Bid to the lowest responsive, responsible Bidder and designating the Contract Price (and establishing the Alternates accepted by the Owner).

Notice-to-ProceedWritten notice issued by the Project Director directing the Contractor to commence the construction activities and establishing the start date of the Contract Time.

On-Site Inspection–The Professional’s on-site examination of the Contractor’s completed or in progress Work to determine and verify to the Project Director that the quantity and quality of all Work complies with the requirements of the Contract Documents.

OwnerThe State of Michigan, with whom the Contractor has entered into the Contract and for whom the Work is to be provided.

Owner Field RepresentativeA State employee or consultant, acting under the direction of the Project Director, providing on-site, periodic observation and documentation of the Work for compliance with the Contract Documents.

Partial UseUse by the Owner of a designated portion of the Work before accomplishing Substantial Completion of the entire Work.

Partial Use does not mean Substantial Completion of the portion of the Work placed in use by the Owner.

PersonIndividuals, partnerships, corporations, receivers, trustees, joint ventures or any other legal entity and any combinations of any of them.

Political SubdivisionAny county, city, village or other local unit of the State, including any agency, department or instrumentality of any such county, city, village or other local unit.

PostBid SubmittalA Qualification Submittal required of the Bidder selected under Section 00100 - 22 before Contract Award, and which is used by the Owner in the evaluation of the Bid of the selected Bidder.

Professional Services Contractor (PSC or Professional)The individual or business entity who has the authority to practice the design disciplines required by the Contract Documents. An Agency with appropriate licensing may replace the PSC in their role if a consultant is not used.

ProjectThe total construction, which includes the Work and possibly other work completed by others, as indicated in the Contract Documents.

Project Director-Designated State employee(s) (a) Responsible for directing and supervising the Professional’s services during the period allowed for completion of the Work; and/or (b) Acting as representative for the Owner and for the enforcement of the Contract Documents, approving payment to the Contractor and coordinating the activities of the State, Owner, Professional and Contractor.

Project ScheduleWork Schedule that shows the Contractor's approach to planning, scheduling and execution of the Work and that accurately portrays completed Work as to sequencing and timing, as provided in the Contract Documents.

Project SpecificationsThe Contract Documents organized into Divisions. "Technical Specifications" means Divisions of the Specifications consisting of technical descriptions of materials, equipment, construction systems, standards and workmanship.

Provisionary AllowanceAn amount included within the Contract Price to reimburse the Contractor for the cost to furnish and perform Work that is uncertain because, for example, it is indeterminate in scope and may not be shown or detailed in the Contract Documents.

Punch ListA list of minor items to be completed or corrected by the Contractor, any one of which do not materially impair the use of the Work for its intended purpose.

Qualified Disabled Veteran (QDV)-QDV as defined by Public Act 22 of 2010, MCL 18.1241.3 and supported by a DD214 Proof of Service and Discharge, a Veterans Administration rating decision letter, proof of disability (if the disability is not indicated on the DD214), and appropriate legal documents setting forth the 51% natural persons QDV ownership.

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

Record DocumentsDrawings, Specifications, Addenda, Change Orders, Change Authorizations, Bulletins, inspection, test and approval reports, photographs, written clarifications and interpretations and all other documents recording, or annotated to show, all revisions and deviations between the as-built installation and the Contract Documents, all approved Submittals and all clarifications and interpretations.

RecordsBooks, reports, documents, electronic data, and other evidence relating to the bidding, award and furnishing and performance of the Work.

Recycled MaterialRecycled paper products, structural materials made from recycled plastics, re-refined lubricating oils, reclaimed solvents, recycled asphalt and concrete, recycled glass products, re-treaded tires, ferrous metals containing recycled scrap metals and all other materials that contain (a) waste materials generated by a business or consumer, (b) materials that have served their intended purpose, and/or (c) materials that have been separated from solid waste for collection, recycling and disposition in the percentage determined by the State as provided by Law.

Request for PaymentThe form provided by the Owner (Payment Request DTMB-0440) to be used by the Contractor in requesting payment for Work completed, which must enclose all supporting information required by the Contract Documents.

Schedule of ValuesA schedule of pay items, which subdivides the Work into its various parts and which details, for each itemized part, cost and pricing information required for making payments for Work performed. The sum of all pay item costs in the Schedule of Values must equal the Contract Price for the Work.

Shop DrawingsIncludes drawings, diagrams, illustrations, standard schedules, performance charts, instructions and other data prepared by or for the Contractor to illustrate some part of the Work, or by a Supplier and submitted by the Contractor to illustrate items of material or equipment.

Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control–The planning, design and installation of appropriate Best Management Practices designed and engineered specifically to reduce or eliminate the off-site migration of soils via water runoff, wind, vehicle tracking, etc. Soil erosion and sedimentation control in the State of Michigan is regulated under The Natural Resources Environmental Protection Act;

Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control, 1994 PA 451, Part 91, as amended, MCL 324.9101 et seq. Soil erosion and sedimentation control associated with this Contract is monitored and enforced by the DTMB-SFA.

StateThe State of Michigan in its governmental capacity, including its departments, divisions, agencies, boards, offices, commissions, officers, employees and agents. Non-capitalized references to a state refer to a state other than the State of Michigan.

State Construction CodeThe Michigan State Construction Code Act, 1972 PA 230, as amended, MCL 125.1501 et seq.

SubcontractorA Person having an agreement with the Contractor to provide labor at the site and furnishing materials and/or equipment for incorporation into the Work.

SubmittalsIncludes technical Submittals, Progress Schedules and those other documents required for submission by the Contract Documents. The term "technical Submittal" includes Shop Drawings, brochures, samples, Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Manuals, test procedures and any other Submittal the Contract Documents require the Contractor to submit to demonstrate how the items covered, after installation or incorporation into the Work, will conform to the information given in the Contract Documents and be compatible with the design of the completed Work as a functioning whole as indicated in the Contract Documents.

Substantial CompletionThe Work, or a portion of the Work designated in the Contract Documents as eligible for separate Substantial Completion, has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents as determined by the PSC, to the extent that the Owner can use or occupy the entire Work, or the designated portion of the Work, for the use intended without any outstanding, concurrent Work at the site, except as may be required to complete or correct Punch List items.

SupplierA manufacturer or fabricator, or a distributor, material man or vendor representing a manufacturer or fabricator, who has an agreement with the Contractor to furnish materials and/or equipment.

Underground UtilitiesPipelines, piping, conduit, duct, cables, wells, tanks, tunnels and appurtenances, or other similar facilities, installed underground to convey or support conveyance of potable water, sprinkler or irrigation water, fire protection systems, electricity, gases, steam, petroleum products, sewerage and drainage removal, telephone, communications, cable TV, traffic or control systems.

Unit Price WorkWork involving specified quantities (i.e., related Work quantities) which when performed is measured by the Professional and paid using the measured quantities and unit prices contained in the Contract Documents. Performance of Unit Price Work for undefined quantities is contingent upon conditions encountered at the site, as determined and authorized by the Professional.

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

Unit Price Work, SpecifiedWork of specified and defined quantities (i.e., quantities are detailed in, and can be taken-off from, the Contract Documents) that when performed is measured by the Professional and paid based on the measured quantities and unit prices contained in the Contract Documents.

Work (as in “the Work,” "the entire Work”)The entire completed Construction required by the Contract Documents. The Work results from furnishing and performing all services, obligations, responsibilities, management, supervision, labor, materials, equipment, construction equipment, general conditions, permits, taxes, patent fees and royalties, testing, inspection and approval responsibilities, warranties, temporary facilities, small tools, field supplies, Bonds, insurance, mobilization, close-out, overhead and all connections, devices and incidental items of any kind or nature required and/or made necessary by the Contract Documents.

Work Involved, any Work InvolvedExisting or prospective Work (a) reflected in any notice, proposal or claim, or (b) reflected in changes ordered or in process, or (c) affected by Delay.

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

APPENDIX II

SPECIAL WORKING CONDITIONS

(Refer to Section 00750)

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

APPENDIX III

SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROJECT PROCEDURES

1. The Contractor must use, handle, store, dispose of, process, transport and transfer any material considered a Hazardous Material in accordance with all Federal, State and local Laws. If the Contractor encounters material reasonably believed to be a Hazardous Material and which may present a substantial danger, the Contractor must immediately stop all affected work, give written notice to the Owner of the conditions encountered, and take appropriate health and safety precautions.

2. This project has been identified by the DTMB-SFA as having a possibility of containing Hazardous Waste materials to be legally removed from the Project job site in order to complete the Work as described in the Proposal And Contract. If removal of friable asbestos material is required, the Contractor must contact the Air Quality Division, Department of Environmental Quality, at (5l7) 284-6773, for a permit and furnish all training, labor, materials, services, insurance, and equipment necessary to carry out the removal operations of all Hazardous Materials from the Project job site, as identified by the Scope of Work, or encountered on the Project job site, in accordance with State and Federal Hazardous Waste Codes. A Contract Change Order will be written to modify the existing Contract to pay for the additional cost.

3. Environmental Hazards (air, water, land and liquid industrial) are handled by the Waste and Hazardous Materials Division, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) in carrying out the requirements of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). For general information and/or a copy of the latest regulations and publications call (517) 335-2690.

4. The Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration (MIOSHA) provides protection and regulations for the safety and health of workers. The Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs provides for the safety of workers. The Department of Community Health provides for the health of workers (517/373-3740) (TDD 517/373-3573).

4.1 Contractor must post any applicable State and/or Federal government regulations at the job site in a prominent location.

4.2 Contractor must be responsible for training their workers in safe work practices and in proper removal methods when coming in contact with hazardous chemicals.

5. Applicable Regulations:

5.1 Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act – PA 451 of 1994, as amended, including Part 111 – Hazardous Waste Management, Part 121 – Liquid Industrial Waste and Part 147 – PCB compounds.

5.2 RCRA, 1976 - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act: This federal statute regulates generation, transportation, treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous wastes nationally.

5.3 TSCA, 1979 – Toxic Substances Control Act: This statute regulates the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of industrial chemicals such as PCBs.

6. Definitions: Hazardous substances are ignitable, corrosive, reactive, and/or toxic, based on their chemical characteristics.

6.1 Under Federal and Michigan Law, a Small Quantity Generator of hazardous waste provides from 220 to less than 2,000 lbs./month or never accumulates 2,200 lbs. or more.

6.2 A Generator size provider of hazardous waste provides 2,200 lbs. or more/month or accumulates above 2,200 lbs.

7. Disposals: To use an off-site hazardous waste disposal facility, the Contractor must use the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest

(shipping paper). Small quantities of hazardous waste may not be disposed of in sanitary landfills used for solid waste.

8. Federal, State and local Laws and regulations may apply to the storage, handling and disposal of Hazardous Materials and wastes at each State Agency. Contact the Environmental Assistance Center of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) at 1-800-662-9278, Fax to: 517-241-0673 or e-mail to: DEQ-EAD-env-assist@michigan.gov for general MDEQ information including direct and referral assistance on air, water and wetlands permits; contaminated site clean-ups; underground storage tank removals and remediation; hazardous and solid waste disposal; pollution prevention and recycling; and compliance-related assistance. The Center provides businesses, municipalities, and the general public with a single point of access to MDEQ's environmental programs.

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

APPENDIX IV

PROJECT SIGN FOR PROJECTS COSTING IN EXCESS OF $500,000

N/A

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

APPENDIX V

PREVAILING WAGE RATES- N/A

Bidding and Contract Document (02/2018) Project Name: Cottage Grove and Madison File No. 761/18238.SAR

APPENDIX VI

BORING LOGS

0.3

4.8 5.0

9.0

15.0

25.0

ASPHALT

FILL- Fine to Medium SAND- Frequent Brick Pieces- Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine SAND- Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine to Medium SAND- Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Brown- Moist to Wet

(SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

3.0

2.9

2.0

2.1

2.2

1.8

1.9

1.1

1.2

1.1

1.2

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

DATE STARTED: 6/7/18 COMPLETED: 6/7/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM/KD (Fibertec)

GROUNDWATER & BACKFILL INFORMATION NOTES: 1. Soil samples were classified according to ASTM D2488, Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure) for environmental purposes only. Therefore, the boring logs and associated report(s) should not be used for geotechnical evaluation or design.

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

3. Listed depths under the profile description are rounded to the nearest tenth of a foot (e.g. 5.75 = 5.8). Refer to the report and attachments for actual sample depths and/or intervals (where applicable).

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 0.5 to 1.5 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings, Bentonite, and Concrete

DURING BORING: 24.0

BORING SB101

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

1.0

5.0

15.0

25.0

ASPHALT

FILL- Fine to Medium SILTY SAND- Occasional Slag Pieces and Cinders- Dark Brown to Black- Moist (SM)

Fine SAND with Silt- Brown- Moist (SM)

Fine to Medium SAND- Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Brown- Moist to Wet

(SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

1.1

1.3

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

Rust colored staining observed from 9.75 to 10 feet.

DATE STARTED: 6/7/18 COMPLETED: 6/7/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM/KD (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 21 to 23 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings, Bentonite, and Concrete

DURING BORING: 23.0

BORING SB102

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

1.5

5.0

10.0

25.0

ASPHALT

FILL- Fine to Medium SILTY SAND- Frequent Slag Pieces- Dark Brown- Moist

(SM)

Fine SAND- Brown to Light Brown- Moist

(SP)

Fine to Medium SAND- Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Occasional Gravel- Brown- Moist to Wet (SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

Fibrous whitish-yellow piece of debris at 1.5 feet.

DATE STARTED: 6/7/18 COMPLETED: 6/7/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM/KD (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 6 to 8 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings, Bentonite, and Concrete

DURING BORING: 23.0

BORING SB103

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

0.2

10.0

25.0

ASPHALT

FILL- Fine to Medium SAND- Occasional Concrete Pieces- Brown- Moist (SP)

FILL- Fine SAND- Occasional Concrete Pieces- Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Trace Gravel- Brown- Moist to Wet (SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

Concrete piece noted at 9 feet.

DATE STARTED: 6/7/18 COMPLETED: 6/7/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM/KD (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 13 to 15 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings, Bentonite, and Concrete

DURING BORING: 23.0

BORING SB104

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

4.0

6.0

10.0

25.0

FILL- Fine to Medium SAND with Silt- Frequent Slag Pieces- Occasional Concrete, Coal and Cinders- Brown- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine SAND- Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine to Medium SAND with Silt- Brown- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Trace Gravel- Brown- Moist to Wet (SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

<1 8.3

5.5

5.1

2.3

1.0

1.4

1.3

1.8

2.1

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

DATE STARTED: 6/7/18 COMPLETED: 6/7/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM/KD (Fibertec)

GROUNDWATER & BACKFILL INFORMATION

GROUNDWATER WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED

NOTES: 1. Soil samples were classified according to ASTM D2488, Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure) for environmental purposes only. Therefore, the boring logs and associated report(s) should not be used for geotechnical evaluation or design.

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 1 to 3 feet.

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings and Bentonite

BORING SB105

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

5.0

10.0

25.0

FILL- Fine to Medium SAND with Silt- Frequent Coal Pieces- Occasional Cinders and Glass Pieces- Dark Brown to Black- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine SAND with Silt- Brown- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine to Medium SAND- Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Trace Gravel- Brown- Moist (SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

2.5

2.3

1.6

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

DATE STARTED: 6/7/18 COMPLETED: 6/7/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM/KD (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 2 to 4 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings and Bentonite

DURING BORING: 23.0

BORING SB106

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

25.0

FILL- Fine to Medium SAND with Silt- Trace Asphalt and Slag Pieces- Dark Brown- Moist

(SP-SM)

Fine SAND with Silt- Brown- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Trace Gravel- Brown- Moist to Wet (SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

1.2

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

DATE STARTED: 6/7/18 COMPLETED: 6/7/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 13 to 15 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings and Bentonite

DURING BORING: 24.0

BORING SB107

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

0.5

2.0

3.0

4.0

10.0

25.0

TOPSOIL- Fine SILTY SAND- Frequent Root Fibers- Dark Brown- Moist (SM) FILL- Fine SILTY SAND- Occasional Coal Fragments- Brown- Moist (SM) FILL- Fine SAND with Silt- Brown- Moist

(SP-SM)

FILL- Fine to Medium SILTY SAND- Frequent Slag and Coal Pieces- Dark Brown to Black- Moist (SM)

Fine to Medium SAND with Silt- Brown- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Trace Gravel- Brown- Moist to Wet (SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.2

1.3

1.2

1.1

1.2

1.6

1.0

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

DATE STARTED: 6/8/18 COMPLETED: 6/8/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 18 to 20 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings and Bentonite

DURING BORING: 23.0

BORING SB108

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

2.5

9.0

25.0

TOPSOIL- Fine SILTY SAND- Frequent Root Fibers- Dark Brown- Moist (SM) FILL- Fine to Medium SAND with Silt- Frequent Slag, Coal, Glass and Brick Pieces- Dark Brown to Black- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine to Medium SAND- Light Brown- Moist

(SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Trace Gravel- Brown- Moist to Wet (SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

1.2

1.0

1.1

1.0

1.1

1.3

1.2

1.3

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.3

1.6

1.0

1.2

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

DATE STARTED: 6/8/18 COMPLETED: 6/8/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 20 to 22 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings and Bentonite

DURING BORING: 22.0

BORING SB109

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

25.0

TOPSOIL- Fine SILTY SAND- Occasional Coal Pieces- Frequent Root Fibers- Dark Brown- Moist (SM)

Fine to Medium SAND- Light Brown- Moist

(SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Trace Gravel- Brown- Moist to Wet (SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

1.1

1.2

1.7

1.4

1.7

1.9

2.0

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

DATE STARTED: 6/8/18 COMPLETED: 6/8/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 22 to 24 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings and Bentonite

DURING BORING: 24.0

BORING SB110

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

25.0

TOPSOIL- Fine SAND with Silt- Frequent Root Fibers- Occasional Slag Pieces- Dark Brown- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine SAND with Silt- Brown- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Trace Gravel- Brown- Moist to Wet (SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

DATE STARTED: 6/7/18 COMPLETED: 6/7/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 7 to 9 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings and Bentonite

DURING BORING: 22.0

BORING SB111

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

3.5

5.0

7.5

25.0

TOPSOIL- Fine SILTY SAND- Frequent Root Fibers- Dark Brown- Moist (SM) FILL- Fine to Medium SAND with Silt- Frequent Slag, Coal, Brick Pieces and Cinders- Dark Brown to Black- Moist

(SP-SM)

Fine SAND- Light Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine to Medium SAND- Light Brown- Moist

(SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Trace Gravel- Brown- Moist to Wet (SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

1.0

1.3

1.2

1.0

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

DATE STARTED: 6/8/18 COMPLETED: 6/8/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 1 to 3 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings and Bentonite

DURING BORING: 24.0

BORING SB112

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

3.5

6.0

25.0

TOPSOIL- Fine SILTY SAND- Frequent Root Fibers- Dark Brown- Moist (SM) FILL- Fine to Medium SAND with Silt- Occasional Brick, Coal and Slag Pieces- Dark Brown and Brown- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine to Medium SAND- Light Brown- Moist

(SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Trace Gravel- Brown- Moist to Wet (SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

1.2

2.8

2.4

1.9

1.3

1.1

1.0

1.1

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

DATE STARTED: 6/8/18 COMPLETED: 6/8/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 2 to 3.5 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings and Bentonite

DURING BORING: 24.0

BORING SB113

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

1.3

10.2

25.0

TOPSOIL- Fine SAND with Silt- Trace Roots and Concrete Debris- Brown- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine SAND- Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Brown- Moist to Wet

(SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

1.5

1.8

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

Trace Gravel from 10.2 to 18 feet.

DATE STARTED: 6/7/18 COMPLETED: 6/7/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM/KD (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 7 to 9 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings and Bentonite

DURING BORING: 24.0

BORING SB114

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

13.0

25.0

GRASS Mat with TOPSOIL- Fine SAND with Roots- Trace Silt- Brown and Black- Moist

(SP)

FILL- Fine SAND with Silt and Coal- Brown and Black- Moist (SP-SM)

Fine SAND- Brown- Moist (SP)

Fine to Coarse SAND- Brown- Moist to Wet

(SP)

END OF BORING AT 25.0 FEET.

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

LS5

Trace Gravel from 15 to 20 feet.

DATE STARTED: 6/7/18 COMPLETED: 6/7/18

LOGGED BY: AHR CHECKED BY: SIB

BORING METHOD: Direct Push

RIG NO.: 6600 AT GeoprobeOPERATOR: JM/KD (Fibertec)

2. The indicated stratification lines are approximate. In situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.

4. No odors noted and no staining observed.

5. A waste characterization sample was collected from 2 to 4 feet.

DEPTH (FT)

BACKFILL METHOD: Soil Cuttings and Bentonite

DURING BORING: 24.0

BORING SB115

PROJECT LOCATION: Grand Rapids, Michigan

PROJECT NAME: Cottage Grove and Madison PROJECT NUMBER: 079127.01

CLIENT: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

S Y

M B

C P

R O

PROFILE DESCRIPTION SO

R Y

(in ch es

(p pm

/N O

REMARKSD

P T

F E

E T

1.3

13.0

25.0

GRASS Mat with TOPSOIL- Fine SAND with Roots- Trace Gravel- Gray and Black- Moist

(SP)

FILL- Fine SAND…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Feb 27, 2025.