AO Attachment 4 Past Performance Survey.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Administering Organization Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
86615624R00010
Issued by
Department of Housing and Urban Development

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Survey that is part of a federal contract opportunity solicitation issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Manufactured Housing Programs (OMHP).

The solicitation is for Administering Organization Services to recommend the initial members of the consensus committee, administer the consensus standards development process, and administer the consensus development and interpretation process for procedural and enforcement regulations and regulations specifying the permissible scope and conduct of monitoring. The survey is to be completed by a reference for the offeror or key personnel, providing ratings and comments on criteria such as quality of service, schedule, cost control, and business relations. The survey is intended to be used in the evaluation of proposals for this contract opportunity.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Administering Organization Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
AO Attachment 2 Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
AO Attachment 1 PWS Recompete 03.21.2024.pdf PDF
RFP 86615624R00010_Administering Organization Services.pdf PDF
AO Attachment 5 Non Disclosure.docx DOCX document
AO Attachment 6 Subcontracting-plan-template.docx DOCX document
AO Attachment 3 Past Performance Information.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 4 Administering Organization Services Past Performance Survey

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY – 86615624R00010

OFFEROR’S NAME: __________________________

This past performance survey is to be completed on the designated contractor or key personnel as designated below:

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):

CONTRACTOR OR KEY PERSONNEL NAME:
Click here to enter text.
CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:
Click here to enter text.
PROJECT TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS
Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Reference):

NAME:
Click here to enter text.
TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER:
Click here to enter text.
PHONE:
Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL
Click here to enter text.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is procuring the services described in the box below. You have been selected by the contractor or key personnel identified above to provide past performance information to HUD to be used in evaluating the offeror’s proposal for this acquisition. Thank you for your input.

The Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD), Office of Manufactured Housing Programs (OMHP) requires a contractor to provide an administering organization that will recommend the initial members of the consensus committee, administer the consensus standards development process and administer the consensus development and interpretation process for procedural and enforcement regulations and regulations specifying the permissible scope and conduct of monitoring.

If this past performance survey is related to key personnel, please summarize the level of interface you had with the designated key personnel throughout the life of the project you oversaw.

For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

2. SCHEDULE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

3. COST CONTROL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

Click here to enter text.

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .