Annex 2 - SAMPLE BUDGET TEMPLATE.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 121 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- 72039125RFA00002
About this file
This is a budget template Excel workbook designed for USAID grant applications, containing six tabs: Instructions, Detail, Narrative, Summary, Travel Table, and Fee Calculation. The template provides a standardized format for detailed cost breakdowns across personnel, fringe benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, contractual services, construction, and other direct/indirect costs. It includes built-in formulas for calculating inflation adjustments and verifying calculations.
The template corresponds to USAID/Pakistan's Inclusive Water Governance Activity (IWGA) grant opportunity (72039125RFA00002) under CFDA 98.001 - USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas. The workbook contains specific sections for expatriate and local staff costs, travel expenses, equipment purchases over $5,000, supplies under $5,000, contractual activities including training and consultants, construction costs, and indirect cost calculations. It includes detailed instructions for completing each section and emphasizes proper documentation of cost assumptions in the narrative tab. The fee calculation tab specifically uses Department of Defense Weighted Guidelines for determining appropriate fee percentages, though this applies only to acquisition instruments, not assistance awards.
Annex 2
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions
TEMPLATE INSTRUCTIONS
You must save this IGCE as .xlsx file, or it will lose some of the formulas.
You should always use a blank template when creating a new. Do not reuse a template used for a previous program. The most current version of the template is available on the USAID Templates Website.
Do not delete sheets, rows or columns while preparing the. Columns and Rows that are not used for this budget should always be hidden, NOT deleted.
| There are 6 tabs at the bottom of this workbook. |
| 1. Instructions - Current Tab |
| 2. Detail - This Tab will have the detailed budget with cost categories |
| 3. Narrative - This Tab will allow you to explain each cost category in further detail. This will be the basis the CO/AO and Activity Manager base their cost realism and cost reasonableness analysis on. |
| Summary - This Tab is an overall snapshot of what was entered into the Detial Tab. |
| 5. Travel Table- This Tab will allow you to list out expected travel for the requirement. |
| 6. Fee Calculation - For contracts only. This tab has separate instructions and help you calculate fee using the DoD Weighted Guidelines Approach. |
DETAILED WORKSHEET
Shaded cells indicate special attention needs to be paid to that cell. Do not alter or change any formulas unless you are able to re-connect link(s) within the worksheets
Modifying the Worksheet
Columns for years that will not be used should be HIDDEN. Do NOT delete any columns!
In general, rows can be added as needed. It is better to HIDE unused rows rather than delete. NEVER delete a shaded row, as these rows contain formulas or other required information!
Completing the Header
Enter the information for each header row in each yellow highlighted cell. Once an entry has been made, the cell will no longer be highlighted yellow. Additionally the headers will show up on other sheets that have been linked
Entering Inflation Factors
| Enter the estimated Inflation Factors for the type of expense in the appropriate yellow shaded cell. The percentage will be applied to the unit cost for Years 2 to 5. Some costs do not automatically receive an inflation adjustment. Activity Managers should determine on a case by case basis for these costs whether increases in years 2 to 5 are necessary. All inflation factors should be justified. |
| Note - For costs that are first incured in year two or later, an initial unit cost needs to be included in year one for the inflation factor to be automatically calculated. |
| Expatriate Salary Increase: Inflation Factor is applied to expatriate, regional and HQ salaries. |
| National Salary Increase: Inflation Factor is applied to national staff salaries. |
| Cost Inflation Factor: Inflation Factor is applied to certain expense categories. Other categories do not automatically calculate an increased unit cost for inflation. Care should be taken when preparing the budget to ensure that cost inflation is applied to each applicable cost. |
Labeling Column Sections for Year and Date
The template is separated into column sections by year.
Enter the expected year period in the space for <Dates>.
Separating Costs by Office within the Worksheet
Costs within each cost category should be shown separately for each office supporting and/or implementing the program. The template is formatted for the country office and one field office. Additional field offices can be inserted into the worksheet if there is more than one field office supporting or implementing the program.
Description
Cells in red have been provided in the Description column for additional entries. Enter a description of the cost item in the space provided. Line descriptions are limited to the column width provided. Descriptions longer than the column width will be cut off. If more detail is needed, include that information in the Narrative Tab.
Certain cells in red indicate where to insert additional lines if needed. Insert additional lines above these lines.
Calculation Verification
| There are several formulas built into the worksheets to assist with verifying that the spreadsheet is calculating totals correctly. These aids will not identify all the possible calculation errors and are meant only to assist the preparer in identifying and correcting errors. A thorough mathematical review should always be done prior to the being submitted to the CO/AO. |
| Note - The calculation verification formulas do not verify individual line calculations. If an individual ine calculation formula has been altered or deleted, the line calculation may be incorrect. Each individual Iline should be recalculated manually when checking the overall Amount. |
| Detail Sheet - Rows: |
| Each row that includes a total calculation has a formula to check the total in the column at the end of the row. If a cost is not calculated correctly, it will say "ERROR." |
NARRATIVE
Care should be exercised to ensure the line descriptions in Column A match the descriptions in the Detail worksheet.
The Narrative is intended to assist the preparer, and should be modified, edited or deleted as needed.
Narrative
| BUDGET NARRATIVE | |
| (This is a brief narrative of each item. Applicants must provide detailed budget narrative for each line item and sub line item detailing all the assumptions as a separate word / pdf document along with the cost application. ) | |
| Program Office: | |
| Country/Region: | |
| Program Name: | |
| Program Dates: |
| COST DESCRIPTION | ASSUMPTIONS | ADDITIONAL INFO |
| PERSONNEL | ||
| EXPATRIATE STAFF | DESCRIPTION | QUALIFICATIONS |
HQ STAFF (US Based) DESCRIPTION
NATIONAL PROGRAM STAFF - ISLAMABAD DESCRIPTION QUALIFICATIONS
NATIONAL OPERATIONAL STAFF - ISLAMABAD DESCRIPTION QUALIFICATIONS
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
Driver Please find details HERE!
| FRINGE BENEFITS | DESCRIPTION |
| <Describe in one or two sentences > | |
| #REF! | <Describe in one or two sentences > |
TRAVEL SEE TRAVEL TABLE
| EQUIPMENT | DESCRIPTION |
| VEHICLES | |
| CAPITAL EQUIPMENT (NON-PROGRAM) | |
| #REF! |
| SUPPLIES | DESCRIPTION |
| GENERAL EQUIPMENT | General equipment a unit price greater than $0 but less than $5,000 |
| For day to day operations and working of the project staff in Islamabad | |
| For day to day operations and working of the project staff in Islamabad | |
| For day to day operations and working of the project staff in Islamabad | |
| #REF! | For day to day operations and working of the project staff in Islamabad |
| #REF! | For day to day operations and working of the project staff in Islamabad |
| #REF! | For day to day operations and working of the project staff in Islamabad |
| #REF! | For day to day operations and working of the project staff in Islamabad |
| CONTRACTUAL | DESCRIPTION |
| GENERAL PROGRAM ACTIVITIES | |
| Universities Assessment Surveys | <Identify the program activity. Describe in one or two sentences the expense and how it relates to a program activity.> |
| TRAINING | |
| Mutiple Trainings as Identifies by the IP in the Applicantion | <Describe in one or two sentences the purpose of the training and how it relates to the program activity.> |
| <Describe in one or two sentences the purpose of the training and how it relates to the program activity.> | |
| DESIGN, MONITORING AND EVALUATION | |
| <Describe in one or two sentences the types of expenses included in the Design, Monitoring and Evaluation cost amount> | |
| EXPATRIATE CONSULTANT | |
| #REF! | <Describe in one or two sentences the purpose of the consultancy and how it relates to the office function.> |
| #REF! | <Describe in one or two sentences the purpose of the consultancy and how it relates to the office function.> |
| LOCAL CONSULTANTS | |
| #REF! | <Describe in one or two sentences the purpose of the consultancy and how it relates to the program activity.> |
| SUBGRANTS - US ORGANIZATIONS | |
| SUBGRANTS - LOCAL AGENCIES |
| CONSTRUCTION | DESCRIPTION |
| CONSTRUCTION - PROGRAM | |
| <Identify the construction activity. Describe in one or two sentences the construction program activity.> | |
| <Identify the construction activity. Describe in one or two sentences the construction program activity.> | |
| <Insert more Construction lines here> | <Identify the construction activity. Describe in one or two sentences the construction program activity.> |
| OTHER DIRECT COSTS | DESCRIPTION |
| HEAD OFFICE COSTS | |
| <Describe in one or two sentences the lease vs buy option, if applicable.> |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| #REF! |
| INDIRECT COSTS | DESCRIPTION |
| <Describe in one or two sentences the how this cost was estimated> | |
| <Describe in one or two sentences the how this cost was estimated> | |
| <Describe in one or two sentences the how this cost was estimated> |
| FEE | DESCRIPTION |
| Fee-Profit | <Reference Fee Calculation Tab> |
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YFo7VEwS2XnB0VDuqcfvUdOVo265wt7_PtkFK222Aeg/edit Detail
| Fill in Inflation Factors on right. ---> | Program Office: | Inflation Factors | General Assumptions for Inflation Only |
| Country/Region: | Expatriate Salary Increase: | ||
| Program Name: | National Salary Increase: | ||
| Program Dates: | Cost Inflation Factor: |
| Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
| <Dates> | <Dates> | <Dates> | <Dates> | <Dates> | Total Estimate | |||||||||||||||||
| Description | Obj. | Out | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Come | Unit | Unit Cost (USD) | No. of Units | Year 1 Estimate | Unit | Unit Cost (USD) | No. of Units | Year 2 Estimate | Unit | Unit Cost (USD) | No. of Units | Year 3 Estimate | Unit | Unit Cost (USD) | No. of Units | Year 4 Estimate | Unit | Unit Cost (USD) | No. of Units | Year 5 Estimate |
PERSONNEL
HQ Technical Staff
SUBTOTAL INTERNATIONAL STAFF - - - - - - Ties
LOCAL IN-COUNTRY STAFF
| <Head Office> |
| Program Staff |
Operational Staff
| <Field Office> |
| Program Staff |
SUBTOTAL NATIONAL STAFF Ties
TOTAL PERSONNEL Ties
FRINGE BENEFITS
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS Ties
TRAVEL (SEE TRAVEL TABLE FOR ADDITIONAL INFO)
TOTAL TRAVEL Ties
EQUIPMENT
Capital Equipment
TOTAL EQUIPMENT Ties
SUPPLIES
General Equipment ($1 to $4999)
TOTAL SUPPLIES Ties
CONTRACTUAL
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
General Program Activities
Trainings
OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES
SUBTOTAL PROGRAM ACTIVITIES Ties
CONSULTANTS
Design, Monitoring and Evaluation
Consultants - Program
SUBTOTAL CONSULTANTS Ties
SUBTOTAL SUBGRANTS Ties
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL Ties
CONSTRUCTION
Construction - Program
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION Ties
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
TOTAL OTHER COSTS Ties
DIRECT COSTS Ties
INDIRECT COSTS
ID#AAABVG6e_u8 Ahmed, Mohib (M/OAA/OD) (2024-09-09 09:21:21) Utilize previous NICRA's if possible to come up with a reasonable estimate.
ID#AAABVG6e_us Ahmed, Mohib (M/OAA/OD) (2024-09-09 09:21:21) Agreement Officer Pre-Approval Required Prior to Award for Purchase if "Capital Equipment?" Reference (2 CFR 230, 15 b [2]
Unit Cost $5K> & 1 Year Life Expectancy or More) (22 CFR 226.25 [c] (6) & 22 CFR 226.2) ID#AAABVG6e_u4 Ahmed, Mohib (M/OAA/OD) (2024-09-09 09:21:21) Additional Indirect Costs will require the preparer to insert the base of application and equations. TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS Ties
TOTAL COSTS - - - - - - Ties
Summary
BUDGET SUMMARY - WRA
| Program Office: |
| Country/Region: |
| Program Name: |
| Program Dates: |
| Cost Category | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Total All Years | |
| a. | Personnel | - 0 | |||||
| b. | Fringe Benefits | - 0 | |||||
| c. | Travel | - 0 | |||||
| d. | Equipment | - 0 | |||||
| e. | Supplies | - 0 | |||||
| f. | CONTRACTUAL | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 |
| g. | GRANTS UNDER CONTRACT (GUC) | - 0 | |||||
| h. | Construction | - 0 | |||||
| i. | Other Direct Costs | - 0 | |||||
| j. | Total Direct Charges | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 |
| k. | Indirect Charges | - 0 | |||||
| l. | Fee-Profit | - 0 | |||||
| M | TOTALS | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 |
Travel Table
| PER DIEM | ||||
| International Per Diem | ||||
| US Per Diem | ||||
| Country Name | Location Name | Lodging | Meals & Incidentals | TOTAL PER DIEM |
| - 0 |
| - 0 |
| - 0 |
| - 0 |
| - 0 |
| INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL | ||||||||||||
| Year | Origin | Destination | # of Trips | # of Travelers per Trip | Purpose | Estimated Unit Cost - Airfare | Total Cost - Airfare | # of Days | Per Diem Rate | Total Cost - Per Diem | Total Trip Cost | |
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| - 0 | ||||||||||||
| Year 5 Sub-Total | - 0 | |||||||||||
| TOTAL INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL | - 0 | $ 101,320.00 |
| DOMESTIC TRAVEL | |||||||||||
| Year | Origin | Destination | # of Trips | # of Travelers per Trip | Purpose | Estimated Unit Cost - Airfare | Total Cost - Airfare | # of Days | Per Diem Rate | Total Cost - Per Diem | Total Trip Cost |
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| - 0 | |||||||||||
| Year 5 Sub-Total | - 0 | ||||||||||
| TOTAL DOMESTIC TRAVEL | - 0 |
Fee Calculation (2)
| DoD Weighted Guidelines for FEE Calculation (ONLY TO BE USED IN ACQUISITION) |
| (http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/r20061004/215_4.htm#215.404-70) |
PURPOSE: This program has been developed to assist in calculating profit/fee
| COST | ENTER COST | Instructions: This section will populate from the "Detail" Sheet. Please validate that the values. | |
| ITEM | CATEGORY | OBJECTIVE | |
| 13 | Material | $0 |
ID#AAABVG6e_uw Ahmed, Mohib (M/OAA/OD) (2024-09-09 09:21:21) USAID does not typically buy raw materials to be manufacturered therefore no cost category was included.
14 Subcontracts - ID#AAABVG6e_uo Ahmed, Mohib (M/OAA/OD) (2024-09-09 09:21:21) If there is GUC authority, this value should not include the grants under contracts, as fee on assistance is not allowed. Also, consultant rates should be fully burdened with fee inclusive of the rate.
| 15 | Direct Labor & Fringe | - | (All Direct Labor) | |||
| 16 | Indirect Expenses | $0 | (All Indirect Costs) | |||
| 17 | Other Direct Costs | - | (All Direct Costs not identified above) | |||
| 18 | Subtotal (13-17) | (Total cost less G&A,IR&D/B&P,and FCCOM) | ||||
| 19 | G & A + OH | - | (G&A Expense and all IR&D/B&P) | |||
| 20 | Total Costs (18-19) | #VALUE! | (Total cost less FCCOM) | |||
| Instructions: Each Activity Manager must justify the assigned weightings for both Technical and Management/Cost Control and the assigned value as well. A discussion must be had with the CO to discuss how to appropriately justify the rating. Also, enter the Contract Risk Type value. This should reflect the overall risk the contractor faces by entering into this contract with USAID. Special attention should be paid in situations where security and location are a factor, as this may increase the Assigned Value. This discussion should be documented within the justification. | ||||||
| ENTER | ENTER | |||||
| CONTRACTOR | ASSIGNED | ASSIGNED | BASE | PROFIT | ||
| RISK FACTORS | WEIGHTINGS | VALUE | (Item 20) | OBJECTIVE | ||
| 21 | Technical | 50% |
ID#AAABVG6e_vA Ahmed, Mohib (M/OAA/OD) (2024-09-09 09:21:21) Must equal 100% 7% ID#AAABVG6e_vE DAU User (2024-09-09 09:21:21) Students will need to justify the value assigned. However, students should use the technical incentive range of 7%-11%, norm of 9%.
22 Management/Cost Control 50% 5% ID#AAABVG6e_u0 DAU User (2024-09-09 09:21:21) Students will need to justify the value assigned, the value range is 3% - 7%, norm of 5%.
| Reserved | ||||||
| 23 | Performance Risk (Composite) | 100% | 6% | #VALUE! | #VALUE! | Justficiation: The assigned weighting for risk factors has been established at 50%; with an assigned value of 7%, for Technical and 50%; with an assigned value of 5% for Management/Cost Control, respectively. This was based on the discussions with the technical office on what proportion of the overall estimated cost revolved around technical approach vs. cost controls. In concurrence with the technical office, the CO was able to determine that Technical and management/cost control are of equal weight. The contract type risk for the contractor is gnerally low for a cost reimbrsment type of contract, as the government assumes most of the risk. However , since the contractor will be working with local small organizations and their weak control systems put the prime contractor at risk of disallowing certain cost. Additionally, no special concerns to security or unstable geo-political were taken into consideration. Using the structured fee approach, the government is able to set a pre-negotiation fee objective limit of 5% for realism against proposed fee by offerors. IAW U.S.C. 2306(d) and 41 U.S.C. 254 (b): (C) For other cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts, the fee shall not exceed 10 percent of the contract’s estimated cost, excluding fee. The pre-negotiation fee objective is within the established statute limitation. |
24 CONTRACT TYPE RISK 5.0%
ID#AAABVG6e_ug DAU User (2024-09-09 09:21:21) Students will enter the value, between 0% - 1%, norm of .5%.
In Video the range is 0%-10% (FJ) #VALUE! #VALUE!
| 25 | WORKING CAPITAL | ENTER | ENTER | |
| COSTS | LENGTH | INTEREST | ||
| ENTER PROG PAY RATE | FINANCED | FACTOR | RATE | |
| 0% | 0.00 | 0% |
| ENTER | ENTER | ||
| CONTRACTOR | ASSIGNED | AMOUNT | |
| FACILITIES CAPITAL EMPLOYED | VALUE | EMPLOYED | |
| 26 | Land | 0 | $0 |
| 27 | Buildings | 0% | $0 |
| 28 | Equipment | 0% |
ID#AAABVG6e_uk DAU User (2024-09-09 09:21:21) Students will need to justify the value assigned, between 10% - 25%, norm of 17.5%.
ID#AAABVG6e_uw Ahmed, Mohib (M/OAA/OD) (2024-09-09 09:21:21) USAID does not typically buy raw materials to be manufacturered therefore no cost category was included.
ID#AAABVG6e_uo Ahmed, Mohib (M/OAA/OD) (2024-09-09 09:21:21) If there is GUC authority, this value should not include the grants under contracts, as fee on assistance is not allowed. Also, consultant rates should be fully burdened with fee inclusive of the rate.
ID#AAABVG6e_ug DAU User (2024-09-09 09:21:21) Students will enter the value, between 0% - 1%, norm of .5%.
| In Video the range is 0%-10% (FJ) | $0 | ||||||
| 29 | Cost Efficiency | 0% | #VALUE! | #VALUE! | |||
| 30 | TOTAL PROFIT OBJECTIVE | #VALUE! | |||||
| Negotiation Summary | Instructions: This section will help the Activity Manager and CO establish a pre-negotiation fee objective. This will be particularly important during Cost Realism and Reasonableness analysis. | ||||||
| Proposed | Objective | Negotiated | |||||
| 31 | Total Costs | #VALUE! | |||||
| 32 | Facilities Capital COM (DD Fm 1861) | $0 | |||||
| 33 | Profit | #VALUE! | |||||
| 34 | Total Price (Line 31+32+33) | #VALUE! | |||||
| 35 | Markup Rate (Line 32+33 divided by 31) | % | #VALUE! | % | |||
| 36 | Profit Rate (Line 33 divided by 31) | #VALUE! |
| Fee on Cost Other then GUC | #VALUE! |
| Fee on GUC | 2% |
| Average Fee | #VALUE! |
Formula Sheet
| CountryName | |
| Afghanistan | |
| Aland Islands | |
| Day | Albania |
| Month | Algeria |
| Year | American Samoa |
| Each | Andorra |
| Percent | Angola |
| Total | Anguilla |
| Indirect | Antarctica |
| Fee | Antigua And Barbuda |
| N/A | Argentina |
| Armenia | |
| Aruba | |
| Australia | |
| Austria | |
| Azerbaijan | |
| Bahamas | |
| Bahrain | |
| Bangladesh | |
| Barbados | |
| Belarus | |
| Belgium | |
| Belize | |
| Benin | |
| Bermuda | |
| Bhutan | |
| Bolivia | |
| Bosnia And Herzegovina | |
| Botswana | |
| Bouvet Island | |
| Brazil | |
| British Indian Ocean Territory | |
| Brunei Darussalam | |
| Bulgaria | |
| Burkina Faso | |
| Burundi | |
| Cambodia | |
| Cameroon | |
| Canada | |
| Cape Verde | |
| Cayman Islands | |
| Central African Republic | |
| Chad | |
| Chile | |
| China | |
| Christmas Island | |
| Cocos (Keeling) Islands | |
| Colombia | |
| Comoros | |
| Congo | |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic Of The | |
| Cook Islands | |
| Costa Rica | |
| Cote D'Ivoire | |
| Croatia | |
| Cuba | |
| Cyprus | |
| Czech Republic | |
| Denmark | |
| Djibouti | |
| Dominica | |
| Dominican Republic | |
| Ecuador | |
| Egypt | |
| El Salvador | |
| Equatorial Guinea | |
| Eritrea | |
| Estonia | |
| Ethiopia | |
| Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | |
| Faroe Islands | |
| Fiji | |
| Finland | |
| France | |
| French Guiana | |
| French Polynesia | |
| French Southern Territories | |
| Gabon | |
| Gambia | |
| Georgia | |
| Germany | |
| Ghana | |
| Gibraltar | |
| Greece | |
| Greenland | |
| Grenada | |
| Guadeloupe | |
| Guam | |
| Guatemala | |
| Guernsey | |
| Guinea | |
| Guinea-Bissau | |
| Guyana | |
| Haiti | |
| Heard Island And Mcdonald Islands | |
| Holy See (Vatican City State) | |
| Honduras | |
| Hong Kong | |
| Hungary | |
| Iceland | |
| India | |
| Indonesia | |
| Iran, Islamic Republic Of | |
| Iraq | |
| Ireland | |
| Isle Of Man | |
| Israel | |
| Italy | |
| Jamaica | |
| Japan | |
| Jersey | |
| Jordan | |
| Kazakhstan | |
| Kenya | |
| Kiribati | |
| Korea, Democratic People'S Republic Of | |
| Korea, Republic Of | |
| Kuwait | |
| Kyrgyzstan | |
| Lao People'S Democratic Republic | |
| Latvia | |
| Lebanon | |
| Lesotho | |
| Liberia | |
| Libyan Arab Jamahiriya | |
| Liechtenstein | |
| Lithuania | |
| Luxembourg | |
| Macao | |
| Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic Of | |
| Madagascar | |
| Malawi | |
| Malaysia | |
| Maldives | |
| Mali | |
| Malta | |
| Marshall Islands | |
| Martinique | |
| Mauritania | |
| Mauritius | |
| Mayotte | |
| Mexico | |
| Micronesia, Federated States Of | |
| Moldova, Republic Of | |
| Monaco | |
| Mongolia | |
| Montserrat | |
| Morocco | |
| Mozambique | |
| Myanmar | |
| Namibia | |
| Nauru | |
| Nepal | |
| Netherlands | |
| Netherlands Antilles | |
| New Caledonia | |
| New Zealand | |
| Nicaragua | |
| Niger | |
| Nigeria | |
| Niue | |
| Norfolk Island | |
| Northern Mariana Islands | |
| Norway | |
| Oman | |
| Pakistan | |
| Palau | |
| Palestinian Territory, Occupied | |
| Panama | |
| Papua New Guinea | |
| Paraguay | |
| Peru | |
| Philippines | |
| Pitcairn | |
| Poland | |
| Portugal | |
| Puerto Rico | |
| Qatar | |
| Reunion | |
| Romania | |
| Russian Federation | |
| Rwanda | |
| Saint Helena | |
| Saint Kitts And Nevis | |
| Saint Lucia | |
| Saint Pierre And Miquelon | |
| Saint Vincent And The Grenadines | |
| Samoa | |
| San Marino | |
| Sao Tome And Principe | |
| Saudi Arabia | |
| Senegal | |
| Serbia And Montenegro | |
| Seychelles | |
| Sierra Leone | |
| Singapore | |
| Slovakia | |
| Slovenia | |
| Solomon Islands | |
| Somalia | |
| South Africa | |
| South Georgia And The South Sandwich Islands | |
| Spain | |
| Sri Lanka | |
| Sudan | |
| Suriname | |
| Svalbard And Jan Mayen | |
| Swaziland | |
| Sweden | |
| Switzerland | |
| Syrian Arab Republic | |
| Taiwan, Province Of China | |
| Tajikistan | |
| Tanzania, United Republic Of | |
| Thailand | |
| Timor-Leste | |
| Togo | |
| Tokelau | |
| Tonga | |
| Trinidad And Tobago | |
| Tunisia | |
| Turkey | |
| Turkmenistan | |
| Turks And Caicos Islands | |
| Tuvalu | |
| Uganda | |
| Ukraine | |
| United Arab Emirates | |
| United Kingdom | |
| United States | |
| United States Minor Outlying Islands | |
| Uruguay | |
| Uzbekistan | |
| Vanuatu | |
| Venezuela | |
| Viet Nam | |
| Virgin Islands, British | |
| Virgin Islands, U.S. | |
| Wallis And Futuna | |
| Western Sahara | |
| Yemen | |
| Zambia | |
| Zimbabwe | |
| (Not Specified) |
Fee Calculations
| Government’s Cost Objective | Weight Range | Assigned Weight | Weighted Fee | |
| Cost Category | ||||
| (i) Contractor Effort |
| This factor measures the complexity of work and the resources required for contract performance. Greater profit opportunity should be provided under contracts requiring a high degree of professional or managerial skill and to prospective contractors whose skills, facilities, and technical assets can be expected to lead to efficient and economical contract performance. |
| AFGP requires some level of technical and managerial resources given the complexity of the program and priorities going to be set by the Ambassador. |
(A) Material Acquisition $276,200 1%-4% 1% $2,762
This subfactor measures the managerial and technical effort needed to obtain the required purchased parts and material, subcontracted items, and special tooling. Considerations include the complexity of the items required, the number of purchase orders and subcontracts to be awarded and administered, etc. (Estimated Cost of Equipment and supplies)
| The acquisition of material for this program will not force the contractor to assume significant risk, as the material costs remain low vis-à-vis the total cost of the contract; however, the prime contractor will administer a number of subcontracts that will require managerial efforts. | ||||
| (B) Conversion Direct Labor | $5,761,165 | 4%-12% | 4% | $230,447 |
| (Estimated Cost of Salaries and Wages) | ||||
| This subfactor measures the contribution of direct engineering, manufacturing, and other labor to converting the raw materials, data, and subcontracted items into the contract items. |
| The scope of work does not require any unusual direct labor conversion to contribute to contract performance. The requirements, however, do require significant technical skills and supervision of CCN level of effort. The prospective contractor’s familiarity with projects of similar size and scope to this contract allowed it to accurately evaluate the caliber of professionals we would need to retain, and continuously recruit, in order to ensure program success. The very specialized nature of its expatriate and local technical team and the level of responsibility and oversight required by its management and operations teams alone reduced the size of the potential qualified candidates’ pool significantly. In addition to the technical and management requirements, however, the technical approach will require significant amounts of training and one-on one mentoring skills from expatriate staff. Finally, one must consider the sheer magnitude of staffing and the significant backstopping required by the program. | ||||
| (C) Conversion-Related Indirect Costs | $4,089,065 | 3%-8% | 3% | $122,672 |
| This subfactor measures how much the indirect costs contribute to contract performance. If the contractor treated indirect labor costs as direct labor costs, no change in profit consideration would exist. | (Estimated Cost of Fringe Benefits and Overhead) | |||
| (D) General Management | $1,093,356 | 4-8% | 4% | $43,734.24 |
This subfactor measures the prospective contractor’s other indirect costs and general and administrative expense, their composition, and how much they contribute to contract performance. Considerations include how labor in the overhead pools would be treated if it were direct labor and whether the elements require routine as opposed to unusual managerial effort and attention. (Estimated Cost of G&A)
| There are no unusual G&A costs required to contribute to contract performance. If the contractor treated G&A costs as direct labor costs, no change in profit consideration would exist. However, the management expertise required to implement this program justifies assigned profit weight. | ||||
| Other Costs | $2,734,268 | 1%-3% | 1% | $27,342.68 |
| (Estimated Cost of Allowances, Training, Travel, ODCs, SAF) | ||
| SUBTOTAL | $13,954,054 | $426,957 |
| Other Factors | Measurement Base | Weight Range | Assigned Weight | Weighted Fee |
| (ii) Contract Cost Risk | $13,954,054 | 0 to 7% | 0% | $0 |
This factor measures the degree of cost responsibility and associated risk that the prospective contractor will assume as a result of the contract type contemplated. This factor should compensate contractors proportionately for assuming greater cost risks. (Total Cost Objective Above)
The contemplated contract type is a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract which normally does not justify a reward for risk in excess of 0 percent. Only a contract that contains cost risk features (e.g., overhead ceilings) might merit greater weight. Ultimately, the U.S. Government assumes the risk at award.
(iii) Federal Socioeconomic Programs -.5% to .5% N/A $0
| FAR Part 19 does not apply to this procurement because USAID/Pakistan will award and the contractor will perform overseas. | |||
| (iv) Capital Investments | -2% to +2% | N/A | $0 |
| The solicitation did not require capital investments; additionally, USAID did not anticipate a pre-existing capital position for this acquisition of technical services | |||
| (v) Cost-Control and Other Past Accomplishments | -2% to +2% | 0% | $0 |
This factor allows additional profit opportunities to a prospective contractor that has previously demonstrated its ability to perform similar tasks effectively and economically. In addition, consideration should be given to measures taken by the prospective contractor that result in productivity improvements, and other cost reduction accomplishments that will benefit the Government in follow-on contracts.
| USAID did not find substantial documentary evidence of either excellent or poor cost control. | ||
| (vi) Independent Development | -2% to +2% | N/A |
| USAID did not solicit not does it expect any independent development efforts | |||
| Additional Factors | -2% to +2% | 1% | $139,541 |
| The prospective contractor must operate in a conflict environment in Pakistan and, thus, exposed to a certain degree of political and physical risk. The prospective contractor is required to coordinate with many stakeholders, including Government ministries, to achieve certain programmatic outputs. | ||
| SUBTOTAL | $139,541 | |
| TOTAL | $566,498 | |
| 4.1% |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .