AI Connect II Project Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Plan.docx

DOCX document 42 KB Posted

Attached to
AI Connect II
Opportunity number
SFOP0009897
Issued by

About this file

AI Connect II Project Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Project Design and Logic Model (with M&E Definitions).docx DOCX document
AI Connect II Budget Narrative Template.docx DOCX document
AI Connect II Detailed Budget Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
AI Connect II Draft Scope of Work Template .docx DOCX document
FY23 NOFO AI Connect II FINAL.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AI Connect II Project Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Red text indicates content the Applicant must enter or update.

Blue text indicates drafting guidance and instructions.

Part 1: Project Context

Applicant/Recipient Name
Name of Applicant/Recipient Organization
NOFO Title/Project Title
AI Connect II
Federal Assistance Listing Number
19.665
Period of Performance
18 months
CDP Strategic Goals & Objectives supported
Bureau Goal 1: Advance cyber and digital policies that align with U.S. national interests and foreign policy objectives.

Objective 1.1: Deepen relationships with existing U.S. allies and partners, forge new partnerships, and engage with a range of countries to advance a common vision for the Internet and digital technologies.

Objective 1.2: Leverage key multilateral fora to build relationships, advance U.S. policy priorities, and guard against positions that are counter to U.S. approaches to the Internet and digital technologies.

Objective 1.3: Identify, enhance, cultivate, and develop strategic engagements across the private sector and multistakeholder communities.

Objective 1.5: Implement public messaging and public diplomacy programs to expand key audiences’ understanding and support of U.S. cyber and digital policies.

DCCP Pillars supported
Pillar 2: Advance an Open, Interoperable, Reliable, and Secure Internet by promoting inclusive, rights-respecting, multi-stakeholder models of internet governance and pro-competition, pro-innovation digital economy policies and regulations.

Pillar 3: Grow Global Markets for U.S. ICT goods and services, especially high-quality, interoperable, secure ICT equipment, software, and services.

Part 2: Indicator Table In the table below, for each indicator, provide the full indicator title, the related project objectives the output/outcome being measured contribute to, the related project activity that will help achieve the output/outcome being measured, whether the indicator measures an output (what we get from the activity) or an outcome (what we achieve from completing the output), the data source (how data will be collected), baseline values (where we are starting) and target (the desired value for the output or outcome).

To complete the below table, consult the DCCP Indicator List and the Indicator Selection Guidance to select additional appropriate DCCP indicators. Project-specific indicators not identified in the DCCP Indicator List, and selected by the applicant, may be collected and should be identified in the table below.

Note: The award recipient will work with the State Department to finalize indicators, including some that will be required by the Department.

Indicator Title
Project Objective(s)
Project Activit(y/ies)
Indicator Type (Output or Outcome)
Data Source/

Collection Method

Baseline Value (if known)
Annual Targets

(if known)

1.1: Instances of program participants engaging with other participants outside of the AI Connect 2.0 activities with regard to the responsible uses of AI. This could include co-authored papers, joint ventures or investments, participation in multi-stakeholder consultations, or public-private partnership.
Project Objective 1
1.2: Number of participant attendees, including their: names; country; sex; affiliation (e.g., government/private/academia).
Project Objective 1
1.3: Number of beneficiary network events and number of current and alumni participants.
Project Objective 1
2.1: Number of multilateral, academic, or industry conferences or events attended by participants from each sector (government, academic, industry, civil society) per country.
Project Objective 2
2.2: Number of public statements from governments or other organizations represented by participants that endorse the OECD AI Principles or other language aligned with the responsible use of trustworthy AI.
Project Objective 2
2.3: Number of conference attendees, including their: names; country; sex; affiliation (e.g., government/private/academia).
Project Objective 2
2.4: Number of network events and number of current and alumni participants.
Project Objective 2
2.5: Numbers of strategies developed and implemented.
Project Objective 2
DCCP 2.1 Number of instances of U.S. telecom/ICT policy positions presented in international or regional fora by the U.S. or DCCP partner countries.
Project Objective 1
DCCP 2.2 - Number of telecom/ICT governance policies, laws, or regulations drafted, proposed, adopted, improved, or implemented with USG assistance.
Project Objective 1
DCCP 2.3 - Number of non-state-owned internet governance institutions strengthened or established with USG assistance.
Projective Objective 1
DCCP 2.4 - Number of private sector, civil society, or other non-governmental organizations with improved capacity for advocacy or engagement with national legislatures on national telecom/ICT, internet, or digital economy policies.
Project Objective 1

Add more rows as needed

Part 3: Performance Monitoring & Evaluation Description This section summarizes how the project will be monitored, including roles and responsibilities for collecting and ensuring the quality of project performance management data the applicant will report.

Provide a narrative explanation describing how project performance will be accounted for, including:

· Roles and responsibilities for collecting data (including the use of sub-contractors, if applicable)

· Further explanation of any data collection methods described in the indicator table, if necessary (e.g., use of specific tools or surveys typically employed by organization)

· Procedures for ensuring data quality and security, including the use of software or other methods

· A description of any evaluations that would be conducted by an independent third-party

- 2 -

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .