sf-30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE Page of Pages 1 3

2. Amendment/Modification No. 3. Effective Date 4. Requisition/Purchase Req. No. 5. Project No.

0002 04/03/2014

6. Issued By: Code 7. Administered By: Code USDA Forest Service Northern California Acquisitions Service Area 2550 Riverside Drive Susanville, CA 96130

See Block 6

8. Name and Address of Contractor (X) 9A. Amendment of Solicitation No.

X AG-9AC7-S-14-0024

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

03/05/2014 10A. Modification of Contract No.

10B. Date Issued (See Item 13)

Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __1____ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting and Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS, IT MODIFIES THE

CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. This Change Order is issued pursuant to: (specify authority)

B. The above numbered contract/order is modified to reflect the administrative changes set forth in Item 14. pursuant to the authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This supplemental agreement is entered into pursuant to authority of:

D. Other (specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _1__ copies to the issuing office.

14. Description of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

This modification hereby removes pages 27, 28 & 29 and replaces them with the amended pages 27,28 & 29, updating the evaluation criteria.

New Offer Due Date: April 24, 2014 by close of business.

*No email offers will be accepted*

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

By signature in Block 15B Contractor releases the Government from all claims relating to this modification. This settlement is complete accord and satisfaction. Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name and Title of Signer 16A. Name and Title of Contracting Officer

KATHERINE E. PASINI, CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. Contractor/Offeror Date Signed 16B. United States of America Date Signed

/s/ Katherine E. Pasini

4/3/2014

(Authorized Signature) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.10-83)

PRESCRIBED BY GSA

FAR (48CFR) 53.243

Amendment 02

Bowerman Barn Beam Evaluation & Repair Page 27 of 29 AG-9AC7-S-13-0024

(ii) Offeror has [ ], has not [ ] (check one) had any officer or agent of Offeror convicted of a felony criminal violation for actions taken on behalf of Offeror under Federal law in the 24 months preceding the date of offer.

(3) The Offeror does [ ], does not [ ] (check one) have any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Relevant Past Performance: Provide a minimum of three references (no more than six) of relevant work of the type and magnitude of this project. Please provide name, title and current telephone contact information.

Relevant Past Experience: Provide a brief synopsis of up to seven separate Timber Frame projects that illustrate that the contractor or subcontractor meet the experience criteria listed below. Each project synopsis shall clearly indicate which experience requirements are being met. The synopsis shall also describe the challenges of the project, how they were overcome and how the project directly correlates to the work expected to be performed at Bowerman Barn.

a. Number of years of Timber Frame Experience. Minimum requirement of five relevant timber frame projects.

b. Identify and describe a minimum of two, but no more than seven projects completed by offeror, which involved rehabilitating (remodel, stabilizing, etc.) existing timber frame structures.

Technical Approach (Understanding the requirement) - Describe your understanding and plan for the job to be performed. Describe the equipment, personnel and methods you propose to accomplish the work in the described timeframes with enough information about your plan to execute the work defined in this solicitation. A key component is demonstrating an understanding of the solicitation requirements.

Price: As stated in the instructions to offerors all pricing shall be submitted using the Schedule provided.

Bowerman Barn Beam Evaluation & Repair Page 28 of 29 AG-9AC7-S-13-0024

SECTION M - Evaluation Factors for Award

52.217-3 EVALUATION EXCLUSIVE OF OPTIONS (APR 1984)

Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by including only the price for the basic requirement;

i.e., options will not be included in the evaluation for award purposes.

Award Determination Award will be made to the acceptable offer providing the best value to the government, considering price and the non-price factors listed below.

The award decision will be based on a tradeoff between price and non-price factors, comparing the relative risk to the government of possible poor or non-performance posed by each of the offerors, and making a judgment as to whether or not reduced risk of performance is worth the additional cost. In some cases this may result in award to a lower ranked but lower priced offer; in other cases the result may be award to a higher-ranked but higher priced offer. The Government reserves the right to make price/ non-price tradeoffs that are in the best interest and to the advantage of the Government.

Evaluation Factors Due to the historical nature of this project and SHPO requirements, the evaluation criteria are unique and specific.

Relevant Past Performance.

Past performance is a measure of the degree to which an offeror satisfied its customers in the past and complied with Federal, State and Local laws and regulations. The Government may contact some of each offeror’s customers to ask whether or not that : (1) that the offeror was capable, efficient and effective; (2) the offeror’s performance conformed to the terms and conditions of its contract; (3) finished within contract time; (4) the offeror was reasonable and cooperative during performance; and (5) the offeror was committed to customer satisfaction. In evaluating past performance the Government may contact some of the references provided by the offeror and other sources of information, including but not limited to: Federal, state and local government agencies, better business bureaus, published media and electronic data bases. If an offer does not have past performance this should be identified and not left blank. Those companies without a past performance record will receive a neutral rating.

Relevant Past Experience Experience Requirements:

a. Timber frame experience is required to be considered for award of this project. Offerors with a minimum of five years of timber frame experience may be evaluated more favorably. Offerors with no timber frame experience will not meet the minimum criteria and will not be considered for award.

b. Minimum two projects rehabilitating (remodel, stabilizing, etc.) existing timber frame structures.

Technical Approach (Understanding the requirement) - Those responses that demonstrate a complete understanding of the work to be performed and provide an excellent approach to accomplishing the major components of the work will receive the highest ratings. The Government will evaluate technical responses strictly on content and will not assume that performance will include anything not specified in the proposal or statement of work.

Price: The Government's intends to assess price to determine reasonableness (reflective of the current market conditions, the offeror's understanding of the work, and ability to perform the contract) and consistency (if prices are balanced and consistent with the Government price estimate and those of other quotes.

Non-price factors when combined are approximately equal to price.

Bowerman Barn Beam Evaluation & Repair Page 29 of 29 AG-9AC7-S-13-0024

This page intentionally left blank.