Amendment 02.doc
DOC document 68 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- AG-82B1-S-10-0242
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Stoddard_Drawings.pdf | ||
| IFB Solicitation_0242.doc | DOC document | |
| Specifications.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
| 1. CONTRACT ID CODE |
| PAGE OF PAGES |
| 1 |
| 3 |
| 2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. |
| 3. EFFECTIVE DATE |
| 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. |
| 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) |
| 02 |
| 04/21/10 |
| 379228 |
| CIM-0413-16T |
| 6. ISSUED BY |
| CODE |
| 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) |
| CODE |
Intermountain EROC 740 Simms Street Golden, CO 80401
| 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State, and ZIP Code) |
| (X) |
| 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. |
FORMCHECKBOX
AG-82B1-S-10-0242
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
03/24/2010
FORMCHECKBOX
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
| CODE |
| FACILITY CODE |
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
FORMCHECKBOX
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers FORMCHECKBOX is extended, FORMCHECKBOX is not extended.
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
| (X) |
| A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN |
THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
FORMCHECKBOX
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
FORMCHECKBOX
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor FORMCHECKBOX is not, FORMCHECKBOX is required to sign this document and return 0 copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.
Solicitation No. AG-82B1-S-10-0242, Stoddard Pack Bridge Rehabilitation on the Salmon-Challis National Forest, is amended as follows:
See attached pages.
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
| 15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) |
| 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) |
| JUDY MARTIN, Contracting Officer |
| 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR |
| 15C. DATE SIGNED |
| 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 16C. DATE SIGNED |
| Judy Martin |
| 4/21/10 |
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
NSN 7540-01-152-8070
Previous edition unusable
| 30-105 |
| STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83) |
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Amendment 02
Stoddard Pack Bridge Rehab Pre-bid Tour
North Fork, ID
4/14/10 1100
Attendee List
Name Representing Phone
Jeff Parker Salmon-Challis NF COR 208-756-5161
Pete Schuldt Salmon-Challis NF Inspector 208-756-5121
Adam Petersen Salmon-Challis NF Inspector 208-756-5186
Tom Gillins USFS Bridge Designer 801-625-5236
Dennis Pratt Pratt Log 208-785-6766
Steve Richards Premier Technology 208-760-0809
Mike Orr Getty/Either Orr Excavating 208-940-0335
Rulen Wellard Wellard Construction Inc.
208-756-3471
Tony Engleman Engleman Steel Erection 208-890-2342
Mark Gantt Timber Builders 406-365-0855
John Perry Timber Builders 406-365-0855
Rich Tomason Timber Works Inc.
801-392-2456
Questions and Answers
Q: What weight restrictions are on the bridges across the Salmon River for delivery vehicles?
A: Pine Creek Bridge: Type 3 – 28 Tons
Type 3S2 – 32 Tons
Type 3-3 – 35 Tons
Cove Creek Bridge:
Type 3 – 26 Tons
Type 3S2 – 30 Tons
Type 3-3 – 33 Tons
Q: Can the access road to the Stoddard Bridge be improved?
A: Only minimally by removing berm or slough material with no widening that would undercut the fill slope to the Salmon River Road.
Q: Can ATVs or generator be taken to the other side of the river?
A: Yes, mechanical and motorized tools can be used for the bridge work but ATVs or other vehicles can not be ridden on the trail on the other side of the river.
Q: What is the design load of the cables?
A: The vertical design load at each cable saddle is 196 Kips. This is a factored loading based on total dead load and a live load of 65 psf.
Q: Can the hook bolts be changed to eye bolts?
A: This is a historical bridge completed in 1938. Our intentions are to reconstruct it as true to the original structure as we can. We would only make substitutions if the original hardware is no longer manufactured or does not meet current safety standards. A submittal can be made for substitutions but approval would only be made following those standards.
Q: The wire fencing and rail lining each side of the bridge are not shown on the plans, are they to be removed and replaced?
A: They are to be removed as part of the demolition of the bridge but are not to be replaced under this solicitation. A modification may be made after award of the contract to replace them with a more appropriate rail design.
The live load is based on 65 psf uniform load. Treated timber weights are based on 50 psf, Q: What is the design load of the existing bridge?
A: The unfactored bridge design loads per bridge length are:
dead load = 355 plf live load= 391 plf.
Q: How much of the bridge can be removed at a time?
A: There are a number of ways to accomplish the removal and replacement, so how much is removed at a time depends on the plan of operation designed by the contractor.
Q: Can the post and rail fence and the bridge approach fences be removed to facilitate construction activities?
A: Yes the can but they will have to be put back in place.
Q: If all the bids are over the advertised range of $250, 000, will that kill the project?
A: Our intentions are to replace the bridge this year, if all the bids indicate that our estimate is missing a key component, we would have to evaluate our situation; however we feel that the project is within the advertised range.
Q: Can the existing OG washers be re-used?
A: No, we are replacing everything to have a new bridge, not a mixture of old and new components.
Q: Can the Stoddard Trailhead area be used as a staging area?
A: Yes, within reason. Float-boaters sometimes use the site as a take-out point, so we do not to block access.
Q: Is contractor responsible for signing along the river to warn float-boaters?
A: No, the Forest will be providing public notifications and if necessary provide some river signage. The contractor will need to follow MUTCD standards for traffic on the road and construction site activities.
Q: Does the contractor have to provide a boat to be used in case of rescue operations for employees accidently falling into the river?
A: The contractor must follow OSHA requirements for construction sites; our contract does not require specific safety measures.
Q: Carriage bolts have hex heads and the existing bolts are square heads, are the hex heads OK?
A: No, square head carriage bolts are still manufactured and available. Again, we are trying to keep the new bridge as authentic as possible.
Q: There are roofs over the tops of the support towers that are not shown on the plans, are they to be replaced?
A: They will be part of the demolition work and are not part of the construction work unless we issue a modification to the awarded contract.
Q: Is an engineered jacking plan required?
A: Yes. The method employed by the contractor to jack up the cables and supply temporary support while work takes place will place different stresses on the cables, depending of the methodology used. Therefore, a designed jacking plan submittal, stamped by a professional engineer, will be required two weeks before any cable jacking can begin.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .