Past PerformanceQuestionnaire.xls
XLS spreadsheet 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Lodging for Boot Camp Participants
- Solicitation number
- AG-7482-S-09-0001
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Statement of Requirements.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE | |||
| Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection/best value analysis. | |||
| Please complete this Questionnaire and mail or send by email or fax to the following not later than close of business December 16, 2008: | |||
| US Department of Agriculture | |||
| Natural Resources Conservation Service | |||
| National Centers Servicing Unit | |||
| Attn: Management Services | |||
| 501 W. Felix Street, FWFC, Bldg #23 | |||
| Ft. Worth, TX 76115 | |||
| FAX: 817-509-3594 | |||
| Email: judith.weber@ftw.usda.gov | |||
| When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly. | |||
| TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR | |||
| 1. Contractor Name & Address: | 2. Contract Number: | ||
| 3. Contract Initiation Date: | |||
| 4. Completion Date: | |||
| 5. Contract Value: | |||
| 6. Type of Contract: | |||
| 7. Description of Contract Requirements | |||
| Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary. | |||
| TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE | |||
| 8. EVALUATION: a. Evaluator's Name, Position (PCO/COTR/Other) and Address | |||
| b. Evaluator's Phone Number | c. Duration of business relations with named firm: | ||
| Please circle the response code which best reflects your experience with this contractor. | |||
| EX-Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective action taken by the contractor were highly effective. | |||
| VG-Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. | |||
| S-Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. | |||
| MG-Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. | |||
| US-Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet those contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. | |||
| Please provide comments to identify specific Strengths/Weaknesses in each area | |||
| A. Customer Relationship | EX VG S MG US N/O | ||
| Cooperative Behavior | EX VG S MG US N/O | ||
| Problem Resolution | EX VG S MG US N/O | ||
| Commitment to Customer Satisfaction | EX VG S MG US N/O | ||
| Responsiveness | EX VG S MG US N/O | ||
| B. Prior Experience | |||
| Personnel Technical Knowledge in Subject | EX VG S MG US N/O | ||
| C. Adherence to Schedule | |||
| Contractor Adherence to Scheduled Dates | EX VG S MG US N/O | ||
| D. Quality of Contractor's Team | |||
| Thoroughness | EX VG S MG US N/O | ||
| Accuracy (of product description and work) | EX VG S MG US N/O | ||
| Overall Quality | EX VG S MG US N/O | ||
| 9. Overall Assessment: (a) Exceptional (b) Very good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not Observed | |||
| 10. Any unsatisfactory performance identified above has been shared with the contractor. ( ) Yes: written/oral ? ( ) No | |||
| Please provide comments to identify: | |||
| a. Specific Strenghs/Weaknesses Related to Part 8 Above--Please Cite the Alpha-Numeric Code | |||
| c. Any areas of performance that are most troublesome. | |||
| Please add a continuation page if necessary. |
&R&"Arial,Bold"&8AG-7482-S-09-0001
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .