EvaluationFactorsandCostBreakdownTable_SolicitationAG-32SD-S-17-0077.pdf

For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in

Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later.

Get Adobe Reader Now!

http://www.adobe.com/go/reader

COST BREAKDOWN BY CLIN NUMBER

CLIN NUMBER MATERIAL LABOR

G&A

(OVERHEAD) BONDING PROFIT

TOTAL

PRICE

(FIRM-

FIXED)

Installation of Generac Industrial

Gaseous Engine-Driven Generator $ $ $ $ $ $

Installation of GTS Series Automatic

Transfer Switch (ATS) $ $ $ $ $ $

Preparation of Site for Concrete Pad for Generac Generator and procurement of 500 gallon propane tank installed on concrete pad along with ancillary supporting equipment/infrastructure. $ $ $ $ $ $

TOTALS $ $ $ $ $ $

Solicitation AG-32SD-S-17-0077 USDA/ARS/PWA, Tree Fruit Research Laboratory (TFRL) 1104 North Western Ave Wenatchee, WA 98801

EVALUATION FACTORS

1. PRICE

Received quotes will first be ranked and arranged by price (lowest first) before the Government assesses technical capability and past performance. Offers will be evaluated based on total price. All offerors must identify a unit price for CLIN 001 to CLIN 003 as listed in SF Form 1442.

For each CLIN pricing, the Offeror should provide cost break down by Material, Labor, G&A (Overhead), Bonding and Profit in the following table:

CLIN NUMBER MATERIAL LABOR G&A (OVERHEAD) BONDING PROFIT TOTAL PRICE (FIRM-FIXED)

INSTALLATION OF

GENERAC INDUSTRIAL

GASEOUS ENGINE-

DRIVEN GENERATOR

INSTALLATION OF GTS

SERIES AUTOMATIC

TRANSFER SWITCH (ATS)

PREPARATION OF SITE

FOR CONCRETE PAD FOR

GENERAC GENERATOR,

PROCUREMENT OF 500

GALLON PROPANE TANK

TOTALS

2. TECHNICAL CAPABILITY OF THE ITEM OFFERED

ABILITY TO MEET ITEM REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS- In order to receive a rating of “acceptable” for this sub-factor, quote must at a minimum, demonstrate item specifications that meet or exceed the required item specifications. Provide specifications that meet or exceed those provided in Attachment 1.

ABILITY TO MEET DELIVERY SCHEDULE- In order to receive a rating of “acceptable” for this sub-factor, quoter shall provide a schedule for delivery that meets the desired delivery date.

3. PAST PERFORMANCE

RECENCY AND RELEVANCY OF PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE IN RELATION TO THIS EFFORT - In order to receive a rating of

“acceptable” for this sub-factor, quoter must, at a minimum provide past experience on similar type contract(s). The past experience should indicate successes of the contractor in completing /meeting delivery dates and customer satisfaction. The Government considers “recent” present/past performance to be within the past 3 years. The Government considers “relevant” present/past performance to be present/past performance effort involved in similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

NOTE: In accordance with FAR 15.305 (a) (2) (iv)), in the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” will be considered “acceptable.”

Solicitation AG-32SD-S-17-0077 USDA/ARS/PWA, Tree Fruit Research Laboratory (TFRL) 1104 North Western Ave Wenatchee, WA 98801

The Government may also use past performance information obtained from other than the sources identified by the quoter. Information obtained from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) database located at http//www.ppirs.gov is one of the sources that will be utilized. PPIRS functions as the central warehouse for performance assessment reports received from several Federal performance information collection systems and is sponsored by the DOD E-Business Office and administered by the Naval Sea Logistics Center Detachment Portsmouth.

Evaluation Summary- If the lowest priced offer is determined to be acceptable for both technical and past performance that offer represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. If the lowest priced offeror is not judged to be technically acceptable or has unacceptable past performance, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is determined to be acceptable for both technical and past performance, or until all offerors are evaluated. Technical and past performance, when combined, are EQUAL when compared to price.