Q A_Document.pdf

Amendment 2

Solicitation: G-2B46-S-16-0013

Questions and Answer Document

Question:

Can you provide better textual information for the existing contours, especially where existing contours fall underneath and adjacent-to the proposed dike from station 00+50 through 27+00?

Response:

The digital files can be provided should they be requested; as well as you can look at the profile for reference to the existing and proposed elevations.

Can you provide the missing specification #405 in the specification manual; this is the spec for the LLDPE?

Response:

This is a typo in the table of contents the specification for the LLDPE is in construction specification 97.

Can you clarify if the on-site soil classification “OL” or “ML” can be used for the 3” cap of topsoil on top of the dike?

Response:

Either of the soil classifications could be used as the topsoil requirement. We simply want the surface course applied back to the top of the dike to promote successful vegetation establishment. Note woody debris portion of the specification.

Can you clarify if the proposed contours in the plans accurately represent the 5:1 slope specified in the plans or, should we create our own contours based upon a 5:1 slope from the edge of the 12’ wide suitable material in the dike core?

The plans are an accurate depiction of proposed conditions.

Is the LLDPE “Typical Key” as shown in the details to be applied to the full length of the LLDPE?

Yes this is correct, please be advised as stated in the site showing this detail will be amended.