Biological_Opinion_for_Edwards_AFB_Final_CON_8-8-14-F-14__2014-F-0123.pdf

PDF 5 MB Posted

Attached to
Request for Qualification (RFQ), Enhanced Use Lease (EUL) Project, Edwards AFB, CA - Secondary Market Financing
Solicitation number
AFCEC-17-R-0002-522294
Issued by

About this file

Biological Opinion for Operations and Activities at Edwards AFB (8-8-14-F-14)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Jurisdictional_Determination_Edwards_Solar_SPL201101084-SLP_USACE_AJDF.pdf PDF
03-01-17_Appendix_A_Edwards_AFB_Depiction_of_the_Property-Amend_2.pdf PDF
EAFB_Industry_Day_Q&As_1Mar17.pdf PDF
03-01-17_Appendix_D_Edwards_AFB_Insurance_Requirements_Amend_0002.pdf PDF
03-01-17_Appendix_B-Edwards_AFB_2008_Env_Baseline_Survey_Amend_0002.docx.pdf PDF
03-01-17_Appendix_E-Edwards_AFB_Mandatory_Clauses_Amend_0002.pdf PDF
03-01-17_Appendix_F-Edwards_AFB_Offerors_Cover_Page_Amend_0002.pdf PDF
03-01-17_Appendix_C-Edwards_AFB_EUL_Existing_Encumbrances_Amend_0002.pdf PDF
03-01-17_Appendix_G-Edwards_AFB_NonDisclosure_Agreement_Amend_0002.pdf PDF
03-01-17_Final_RFQ_-_Edwards_Solar_EUL_(AFCEC-17-R-0002)_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
03-01-17_Edwards_AFB_EUL_FBO_Synopsis_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Final_RFQ_-_Edwards_Solar_EUL_(AFCEC-17-R-0002)_Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Appendix_A_Edwards_AFB_Depiction_of_the_Property-Amendment_1.pdf PDF
Edwards_AFB_EUL_FBO_Synopsis_Amendment_0001(20170217).pdf PDF
Final_RFQ_-_Edwards_Solar_EUL_(AFCEC-17-R-0002).pdf PDF
Appendix_D_Edwards_AFB_Insurance_Requirements.pdf PDF
2-3-17_Edwards_AFB_EUL_FBO_Synopsis.pdf PDF
Appendix_E-Edwards_AFB_Mandatory_Clauses.pdf PDF
2-3-17_Appendix_A_Edwards_AFB_Depiction_of_the_Property.pdf PDF
Appendix_C-Edwards_AFB_EUL_Known_Existing_Encumbrances.pdf PDF
Appendix_F-Edwards_AFB_Offerors_Cover_Page.pdf PDF
Appendix_G-Edwards_AFB_NonDisclosure_Agreement.pdf PDF
Appendix_B_-_Edwards_AFB_EUL_2008_EBS.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Allison (2013) also evaluated changes in size distribution of desert tortoises since 2001. In the Western Mojave, Eastern Mojave, and Colorado Desert recovery units, the median size of large individuals has increased, indicating less recruitment of younger (therefore smaller) desert tortoises. In the Western Mojave and Colorado Desert recovery units, the relative number of smaller desert tortoises is about half what it was in 2001. Taken together, these trends suggest fewer small desert tortoises are reaching sexual maturity, which may be explained because they comprise a smaller proportion of the population or possibly because their survival rates are relatively lower than those of adults. Either possibility indicates that smaller size classes, like adults, are affected by ongoing threats; however, because most small desert tortoises die before reaching 180 millimeters in length, we do not know whether the reduced number of small animals has directly contributed to the observed declining trends in adults. For instance, a small increase in adult mortality would have a much larger effect on adult densities. None of these demographic rates have been measured in parallel with this study, so we cannot point to specific demographic rates that are associated with these overall population declines.

In the 5-year review, the Service provides a brief summary of habitat use by desert tortoises;

more detailed information is available in the revised recovery plan (Service 2011a). In the absence of specific and recent information on the location of habitable areas of the Mojave Desert, especially at the outer edges of this area, the 5-year review also describes and relies heavily on a quantitative, spatial habitat model for the desert tortoise north and west of the Colorado River that incorporates environmental variables such as precipitation, geology, Year lo g

D en si ty

(p er h a) e -̂6 e -̂5 e -̂4 e -̂3 e -̂2

2000 2005 2010

Colorado Desert Eastern Mojave

2000 2005 2010

Northeastern Mojave

UpperVirginRiver

2000 2005 2010 e -̂6 e -̂5 e -̂4 e -̂3 e -̂2

Western Mojave

Since the completion of the 5-year review, the Service has issued several biological opinions that affect large areas of desert tortoise habitat because of numerous proposals to develop renewable energy within its range. These biological opinions concluded that proposed solar plants were not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the desert tortoise primarily because they were located outside of critical habitat and desert wildlife management areas that contain most of the land base required for the recovery of the species. The proposed actions also included numerous measures intended to protect desert tortoise during the construction of the projects, such as translocation of affected individuals. In aggregate, these projects would result in an overall loss of approximately 37,503 acres of habitat of the desert tortoise. We also predicted that these projects would translocate or kill up to 1,732 desert tortoises; we concluded that most of the individuals in these totals would be juveniles. To date, 372 desert tortoises have been observed during construction of projects; most of these individuals were translocated from work areas, although some desert tortoises have been killed (see appendix 2). The mitigation required by the Bureau and California Energy Commission, the agencies permitting these facilities, will result in the acquisition of private land within critical habitat and desert wildlife management areas and funding for the implementation of various actions that are intended to promote the recovery of

Global climate change is likely to affect the prospects for the long-term conservation of the desert tortoise. For example, predictions for climate change within the range of the desert tortoise suggest more frequent and/or prolonged droughts with an increase of the annual mean temperature by 3.5 to 4.0 degrees Celsius. The greatest increases will likely occur in summer (June-July-August mean increase of as much as 5 degrees Celsius [Christensen et al. 2007 in Service 2010b]). Precipitation will likely decrease by 5 to 15 percent annually in the region with winter precipitation decreasing by up to 20 percent and summer precipitation increasing by up to 5 percent. Because germination of the desert tortoise’s food plants is highly dependent on cool-season rains, the forage base could be reduced due to increasing temperatures and decreasing precipitation in winter. Although drought occurs routinely in the Mojave Desert, extended periods of drought have the potential to affect desert tortoises and their habitats through physiological effects to individuals (i.e., stress) and limited forage availability. To place the consequences of long-term drought in perspective, Longshore et al. (2003) demonstrated that even short-term drought could result in elevated levels of mortality of desert tortoises.

Therefore, long-term drought is likely to have even greater effects, particularly given that the current fragmented nature of desert tortoise habitat (e.g., urban and agricultural development, Lakes allotments, which are located within critical habitat in the Western Mojave Recovery Unit;

Habitat Characteristics of the Action Area

The following information provides a summary of the discussion of habitat characteristics from the biological evaluation (Air Force 2008a) and integrated natural resources management plan (Air Force 2008b). The proposed action area is located in the western portion of the Mojave Desert mid-way between the southern end of the Sierra Nevada and the San Bernardino Mountains. Edwards Air Force Base is visually dominated by three dry lakebeds: Rosamond, Rogers, and Buckhorn dry lakes. The area is characterized as high desert with broad expansive valleys bordered by low rocky hills.

The main plant communities on base include creosote bush scrub, saltbush scrub, Joshua tree woodland, and mesquite woodland. The zonal plant communities are primarily based on soil characteristics and elevation; elevation ranges on the base range between 2,500 to 3,300 feet, and topography gradually slopes from west to east. Vegetation in the upland areas on base consists of two main plant communities: creosote bush scrub and Joshua tree woodland. Lowland communities consist of the alkali sink and saltbush communities.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .