Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Marksmanship Trainer.pdf
PDF 79 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Lasershot Mobile Marksmanship Trainer
- Solicitation number
- W912TF26QA022
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
This document is an addendum to FAR 52.212-2 establishing evaluation criteria for a simplified acquisition purchase order for commercial products and commercial services. The evaluation will be conducted using a best value approach, considering price and technical factors to determine the most advantageous quote to the Government.
The Price evaluation factor requires that all line items be priced in accordance with the solicitation and that prices be determined reasonable and balanced. The Technical evaluation factor assesses Technical Acceptability on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis. Quoters must clearly state their response to all brand name line items specified in the solicitation, provide detailed documentation of how their product meets or exceeds minimum Salient Characteristics, and include delivery requirements. Quotes will be deemed Unacceptable if they fail to clearly explain how the product meets or exceeds the specified line items or if they quote a product that is not the brand name listed in the solicitation.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services
(a) The Government will award a Purchase Order resulting from this solicitation to the responsible quoter whose quote conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government on price and other factors considered, conducted in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 13, Simplified Acquisition procedures, whose quote conforms to the solicitation evaluation factors listed below:
(b) Price
a. All line items are priced IAW the solicitation.
b. Price are determined to be reasonable and balanced
(c) Technical
a. Technical Acceptability is evaluated on the quoters ability to provide a detailed response on how they meet the Salient Characteristics of the brand name item in the solicitation to include any accessories listed. Quoters will be evaluated on Acceptable or Unacceptable as follows:
i. Acceptable:
1. Quoter clearly states the response to all Brand Name Line
Items in solicitation
2. Quoter provides details on how their product meets or exceeds minimum Salient Characteristics
3. Quoter provides delivery requirements to the government
ii. Unacceptable
1. The quote fails to clearly explain the how the product meets or exceeds the line items in the Solicitation
2. Quotes to product that is not the brand name listed
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .