Addendum One .pdf

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY

DEPARTMENT FOR FACILITIES AND SUPPORT SERVICES

DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

INVITATION TO BID NO: RFB-117-26

FOR: Yatesville Lake Marina Replacement Yatesville Lake State Park Department of Parks Louisa, Kentucky

DATE: November 24, 2025

RFB-785-2600000201

ADDENDUM NO. One (1)

BIDDER SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING CHANGES AS SAME SHALL BECOME BINDING

UPON THE CONTRACT TO BE ISSUED IN RESPONSE TO THIS INVITATION TO BID.

Item 1: Refer to attached addendum for all additions, deletions, and/or changes to specifications and/or drawings.

Item 2: Bidders must use Revised Unit Price Page in lieu of previously issued.

END OF ADDENDUM

Invitation to Bid No. RFB-117-26 For: Yatesville Lake Marina Replacement Yatesville Lake State Park Department of Parks Louisa, Kentucky

Susan Ward, Statewide Procurement Analyst II Division of Engineering and Contract Administration

RFB-117-26

REVISED

OFFICIAL BID DOCUMENT

FOR

YATESVILLE LAKE MARINA REPLACEMENT

YATESVILLE LAKE STATE PARK

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS

LOUISA, KENTUCKY

LIST OF UNIT PRICES: (ALL BLANKS MUST BE FILLED IN)

Unit prices shall include the furnishing of all labor, materials, suppliers, services and shall include all items of cost, overhead and profit for the Contractor and any Subcontractor involved, and shall be used uniformly without modification for either additions or deductions. The Unit Prices as established shall be used to determine the equitable adjustment of the Contract Price in connection with changes or extra work performed under the Contract. Failure to completely fill out all unit prices requested may result in bid rejection.

DESCRIPTION OF WORK

UNIT PRICE

UNIT OF

MEASURE

1. Concrete $ CY

RFB-117-26

Yatesville Lake Marina Replacement

Pre-Bid Questions and Answers

1. Can you confirm the limits of new asphalt paving and/or pavement replacement?

Sheet CS-100 references site improvements and paving details; however, no defined limits are shown on the site plan.

Can you confirm whether repaving is intended to include the entire access and parking area or only those construction areas disturbed during installation of new utilities and structures?

Response: New asphalt and/or pavement will be limited to what is patch and repair for any u�lity work, damage due to adjacent construc�on of new gangway hinge, and any other damage as a result of construc�on ac�vi�es.

2. Please confirm whether a retaining wall is part of this project scope?

Sheet CS-501 includes a “Retaining Wall – Not to Scale” detail, but no corresponding wall or callout appears on the site plan. During the pre-bid meeting, it was mentioned that the retaining wall detail may have been included in error. Please confirm if this detail should be disregarded and that no retaining wall construction is required under this contract.

Response: Retaining wall detail on CS-501 should be disregarded. There are no retaining walls required in this project.

3. Sheet CS-501 references various site construction details but does not show a bollard detail or any corresponding callouts on the site plan.

Please confirm whether any bollards are required under this contract, and if so, provide the intended locations and specifications.

Response: Bollard detail on CS-501 should be disregarded. There are no bollards required in this project.

4. In section 231323 it states the following: 2.4 FUEL DISPENSERS A. Existing fuel dispensers will be utilized. Reconnect to new fuel lines Can you verify if this used equipment is repurposed for the project as there are contradictions in the other parts of the documents.

Response: Disregard, all new fuel dispensers are to be used on this project.

5. On the list of unit prices document, there is the Earthwork bid item. Please indicate what needs to be included for this.

Response: This can be disregarded. No earthwork is currently required.

6. Is there a bathymetric survey of the marina?

Response: Yes, see sheet contours shown in the lake footprint is bottom of lake topo.

7. Please provide the as-built drawings for the existing marina.

Response: See attached exhibit for existing marina as-builts.

8. Can the existing concrete anchors be re-used?

Response: They may be reused if they are relocated to correct locations for new marina anchoring plan.

9. Can the current anchor lines be cut at the surface or will they need to be completely removed?

Response: They will need to be removed to the extent feasible.

10. Section 131250 part 2.2.F.1 on concrete deck materials states, “Concrete Panels shall be

2x2 in size and 3500 psi.” However, numerals “c - d” describe a method to attach the decking that resembles more a wooden system. Please clarify how the concrete decking needs to be attached to the lumber underneath.

Response: Disregard any deck details that show wood. Decks are to be 2 X 2 concrete panels.

11. What is the thickness of the concrete decking?

Response: Per manufacturer. To be reviewed with shop drawings.

12. Do the 2x2 concrete decking blocks need to be chamfered?

Response: Per manufacturer. To be reviewed with shop drawings.

13. Will the concrete decking require an anti-slip surface on top?

Response: Yes.

14. Please provide a drawing with details on a decking block which resembles what the state would like contractors to provide.

Response: See detail #2 on sheet CS-504.

Sheet

15. Drawing CS-502 has several details that don’t match the rest of the drawings.

Response: Disregard details 1-3 which are not used on this project. See revised detail for A

Cleat Layout for Head Dock Courtesy and Fuel Dock.

16. Drawing S-301 and S-302 show the roof on the docks. However, a note states, “super structure by others”. Does the contractor need to provide and install the roof and its vertical frame?

Response: Yes

17. Please indicate what is the contractor’s laydown area.

Response: See the Site Laydown Plan CS-100A

18. Please indicate what should contractor do with the existing metal roof on the C-D docks?

Will the state salvage the frames as well?

Response: See the Site Laydown Plan CS-100A. The frames are to be cut at the dock level and will be put in the roofing laydown area with the roof.

19. Per site visit, please provide any upgrade on the utility plans.

Response: Contractor are to bid drawings as they are.

20. The design narrative mentions dock relocation of Dock D and C. Please confirm that all docks will be new and docks D and C will be removed and the roof structure salvaged.

Response: Concur. All docks are new and all of the two covered docks’ structure and roofing are to be set aside for the state at the location indicated in the site laydown layout.

21. Will a list of salvageable items be provided to the bidders, IE, fuel system components, oEice equipment, freezers/coolers, retail racks, winches, etc.?

Response: The only items being salvaged by the state are the structure and roofing for the two existing covered docks. All else is to be the contractor’s responsibility.

22. Section 220100 mentions several inspections that require approval certificates. Since the state is hiring the special inspections, please clarify if the companies providing such inspections will provide the approval certificates (upon inspection) or are these certificates to be acquired independently by the contractor?

Response: Contractor are to bid drawings as they are.

23. Section 260514, part states, “Painting required for surfaces not otherwise specified”. Please provide examples of what kind of surfaces would require paint. Also indicate the type of paint needed.

Response: Disregard paint reference.

24. Spec calls for 10,000gal and Fuel details on drawings call for 4,000gal. Need to know what size tank to price.

Response: 4,000 gallon.

25. Specs call for gasboy dispenser with single product single hose, while Fuel detail drawings show Bennett single product dual hose with hose reels. These are 2 very diEerent designs and 2 diEerent manufacturers. Please provide basis of design and if either manufacturer are authorized. Also please indicate if the device needs to display gallons and dollar amount

(retail) or just gallons.

Response: Contractor to base bids on Bennett single product dual hose with hose reels.

26. Based on drawing CS-100 please clarify if the roof cover on the home dock will only be required in the fuel pump space.

Response: No, the Head Dock has a roofed building that has an outdoor covered space, see architectural and structural plans.

27. Please clearly identify the full length (perimeter) of the dock fence on drawing CS-101.

Response: See EXH-505

28. One of the recommended fuel tank manufacturers provides a subscription for a “tank remote monitoring system”. Is the state interested in acquiring that technology?

Response: This can be discussed with successful bidder.

29. Per Pg. 59 on Plan Set, Will dock Nema cabniets be supplied by others or by the contractors?

Response: Contractor.

30. Per Pg. 59 on Plan Set, Will fiber optic back bone to dock nemas from MDF need ran underground?

Response: Each dock has separate entrance from the utility.

31. Per Pg. 59 on Plan Set, Will RG6 Cabling for TV be ran from each dock location back to dock nema location?

Response: Empty conduit system for use by Cable TV company if anyone orders TV. Cabling at that time.

32. Per Pg. 59 on Plan Set, Will telephone be ran from ISP to nema and Cat6 ran to dock locations?

33. Per Pg. 59 on Plan Set, Will Cable plant extension be ran to each Nema from ISP?

Response: No.

34. Per Pg. 59 on Plan Set, Will all data at dock locations be ran back to Nema?

35. Per Pg. 59 on Plan Set, Will switches need to be supplied for nema D & E for fiber and data?

36. Per Pg. 61 on Plan Set, Where will client sever work station be located?

Response: See E-702, keynote 10.

37. Per Pg. 61 on Plan Set, Are we suppling TV for sales area, if so what size and spec?

38. Per Pg. 61 on Plan Set, Will a wall mount swing frame rack with 12U be suEicient for all data housing?

39. Per Pg. 60 on Plan Set, Will any addition cameras be needed for dock areas?

Response: None shown at this time.

40. Per Pg. 787 1.8 A on Specs, Does the warranty have to cover workmanship and equipment.

41. Per Pg. 788 2.1 B on Specs, When discussing surge, is a UPS required or just surge protection?

Response: Yes, see E-702.

42. Per Pg. 789 #8 on Specs, How many clients are required to run simultaneously?

Response: Not sure, but plan on at least 2.

43. Per Pg. 789 #13 on Specs, Are the cameras supposed to record audio? If so, spec'd camera models may need to be adjusted or external microphones and additional cabling will be required.

44. Per Pg. 789 #17 on Specs, How many cameras are going to be displayed simultaneously from the single client machine?

Response: See specification 282300, page 5, article 2.3C.

45. Per Pg. 790 #23 on Specs, Will the state provide configuration of the network to allow the transmission of the required data for the remote application to work? How many instances of the mobile application need to be able to run simultaneously?

Response: System shall have capability. Not set up at this time.

46. Per Pg. 792 #24 on Specs, is that referring to edge recording with an SD card in the camera?

All recorded video goes to a database without cloud or edge recording.

47. Please notify contractors if the utility electrical plan will remain as published on the current documents. On the site visit, an upcoming change was announced. However, no addendum has been provided on 11/17.

Response: I have no idea what change was forthcoming and not sent.

48. Can concrete decking block sizes be provided in other sizes other than 2x2 (4 sf), as long as they don’t exceed a 4 sf area?

49. In section 231323, 2.4 it states “A. Existing fuel dispensers will be utilized. Reconnect to new fuel lines”. Please clarify if this used equipment is being repurposed for the project as there are contradictions in other parts of the documents.

Response: See question/response #4

50. In order to properly price the dock demolition, please provide a drawing showing all existing anchor cables and concrete anchor locations.

Response: See attached existing historical drawings.

51. In order to properly price the temporary utilities for the site, please provide drawings with the existing utilities configuration.

Response: See attached existing historical drawings.

52. What are the dimensions of individual docks on the existing docks D and C?

Response: Bidders to scale from drawings.

53. Drawing plans “CS” series shows note 3 for new abutment. Please provide dimensions and depth for the new structure.

Response: The connection of the new gangway to the shore is the only new abutment. This will require demo of some of the existing concrete and sidewalk to install new abutment in kind.

54. Will contractor be allowed to pour abutment concrete underwater?

Response: Abutment is above normal summer pool.

55. Please provide reinforcement details on abutment and concrete decking.

Response: See S301 for abutment details.

56. A dock manufacturer asked if dock dimensions can be adjusted to standard sizes?

Response: Bidders to bid drawings. Successful bidder may submit alternate sizes for review and approval.

57. A dock manufacturer proposed the following changes to the anchoring system:

o A dock: 4 additional winch assemblies and anchors - Concur o B dock: 4 additional winch assemblies and anchors - Concur o C dock: 4 additional winch assemblies and anchors - Concur o D Dock: 6 additional winch assemblies and anchors- Concur o E dock:

8 additional winch assemblies and anchors- Concur

6ft fingers instead of 4ft fingers to accommodate for the snow load specs – Please bid drawings as they are.

Need confirmation that eve height is 28ft and slip widths are 23ft. - Concur o A dock:

3 additional anchors – 2 on the store’s platform and 1 on the single covered slip (2 should be north bound and 1 should be south west bound on the store platform). -

Concur

There seems to be a discrepancy between specs and the building code on the distance of fuel pumps from an enclosed structure. – Unclear what is being asked. Fuel pump is under covered slip that is open to the air. Only enclosed space is head dock building on opposite end of home dock.

Response: See above notes.

58. The specs say 24g gutters and prints say 6” continuous gutters. which are contractors doing?

Response: Bid gutters as specified.

59. Manufacturer believes that length and design of gangway on print C201 shows gangway as a two piece, approximately 70-foot 40/30’ but on C503 shows a 40-foot hinge with wheels on the other end. Please clarify desired gangway design. If ADA compliant, requirement is a 4’-

6” deck surface. Print shows 4 foot but code is 4 foot inside of grab rails.

Response: CS-201 is correct for length of gangways. The width of the gangway is to be 6’.

60. Manufacturer believes that at the Home Dock it may be best to do a pivot hinge with connections on both ends of gangway because its dock is on independent cables and anchors. This would ensure gangway always stays connected.

Response: Top of gangway to be a fifth wheel. Head dock to be steel rollers on steel plate with angles welded to plate to prevent sliding.

61. We feel all head piers need more anchors: suggest adding new anchors 90° oE the head piers to oppose wind and wave action coming down the harbor. Recommend pier E and pier

D have 12 on each pier and 10 on other three piers.

Response: Concur.

62. Please clarify, anchor design CS502 shows a 4500-pound anchor (approximately 3000 in water). Also S301 shows a 9400-pound anchor (6000 pound in water), would it be fine to use

8000-pound plowed anchors?

Response: Anchors to be 2-4500 lb. anchors per winch.

63. On roof design state has specified 2 1/2 14-gauge columns, can 2 1/2 11-gauge, be used?

64. 26-gauge roof panels are specified, can 24 gauge be used?

Response: Concur.

65. Manufacturer suggests to re-evaluate snow loading and associated spans.

Response: See response to question #57.

66. On Pier E and peer D the slip widths are 23’. On E, the most common size for a 60-foot slip is

20-foot wide. 23’ can make it hard for most boaters to get oE either side of their boats.

Please consider a change.

67. On pier D, 18-to-20-foot widths are more common. Please consider a change.

68. Please provide snow load requirements.

Response: See S-001.

52.00'

73.63'

66.00'52.75'66.00' 52.75'

66.00' 131.50'

108.00' 157.75'

60.00' 8.00'

60.00'

50.00' 8.00'

50.00' 30.00'

6.00' 30.00' 30.00'

6.00' 30.00' 30.00'

6.00' 30.00'

8.00'

22.00'

.0

0'

.0 0'

.0

0'

4.

(T

YP

.0

0' (T

YP

4.

(T

YP

.0

0' (T

YP

2.

22.00'

(TYP.)

2.

2.

2.

2.

4.

(T

YP

.0

0' (T

YP

30.00'

(TYP.)

4.

(T

YP

.0

0' (T

YP

4.

(T

YP

.0

0' (T

YP

4.

(T

YP

.0

0' (T

YP

8.

SUM

P

FUEL

TANK

2020202020 20202020202020202020202020 20

7 588

590 591 592

8 639

641 64

601 602

128.00'

645645

22.00'

64'

36'

0'

0 50' 100'25'50'

SCALE: 1"= 50'

N

R

TA

Fr i, N ov

- 3 :0

1p m

FI

LE

N

AM

E:

G

:\5

6-

KY

M ar in as

\0 5-

Ya te sv ille

\W or ki ng

D ra w in gs \A ut oC

AD

\5

6-

-C

S-

0A .d w g www.grwinc.com engineeringarchitecturegeospatial

LAYDOWN AREA

FOR DOCK

ROOFING

METAL AND

STRUCTURE

SITE STAGING AREA

AutoCAD SHX Text 10/03/25

AutoCAD SHX Text

RTA DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DECA LOG #

AutoCAD SHX Text

A&E FILE NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

CHECKED BY

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWN BY

AutoCAD SHX Text 10/03/25

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING INFORMATION

AutoCAD SHX Text 5146-05

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

AS BUILT DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

TBD

AutoCAD SHX Text

PHASE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION HISTORY OF THIS DRAWING

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS

AutoCAD SHX Text

YATESVILLE LAKE STATE PARK MARINA

AutoCAD SHX Text

FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY

AutoCAD SHX Text

DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

DEPARTMENT FOR FACILITIES AND SUPPORT SERVICES

AutoCAD SHX Text

FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION CABINET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY

AutoCAD SHX Text

ACCOUNT NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

670-CBRD-YL11-00

AutoCAD SHX Text

YATESVILLE LAKE, LOUISA, KY

AutoCAD SHX Text

RTA

AutoCAD SHX Text

NR

AutoCAD SHX Text

RSS

AutoCAD SHX Text

CS-100A

AutoCAD SHX Text

OVERALL SITE LAYDOWN PLAN

8'

12'

8' 12'

YTATE PARK MARINA

CITY OF LOUISA, KENTUCKY

DATE BYDESCRIPTIONNO.

REVISIONS

SCALE CHECK: THIS MARK SHOULD MEASURE EXACTLY 1/2" WHEN PLOTTED

DATE:

SCALE:

SHEET NO.

NOVEMBER 21, 2025

DESIGNED:

DRAWN:

REVIEWED:

APPROVED: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED:

THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF GRW ENGINEERS, INC. AND SHALL

NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART OR USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

OF OTHER THAN THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION

GRW PROJECT NO. 5146-05 CLIENT PROJECT

engineeringarchitecturegeospatial www.grwinc.com

AS SHOWN

LHR

LHR

RSS

RSS

NO. 670-CBRD-YL11-00

YATESVILLE LAKE

SECURITY GATE EXHIBIT

0 5' 10'2.5'5'

SCALE: 1"= 5'

N

EX

H

-5

NOTE: SEE CS-501FOR

FENCE AND GATE DETAILS.

AutoCAD SHX Text 635.8ft

Marina_As-Built_1996