Addendum - 52.212-2, Evaluation.pdf
PDF 135 KB Posted
- Attached to
- B-344 Flooring Replacement
- Solicitation number
- FA446025Q0339
About this file
This document is an Addendum to the Evaluation Criteria for Commercial Products and Commercial Services (52.212-2, November 2021) for the B-344 Flooring Replacement solicitation at Little Rock Air Force Base. The government will evaluate offers based on three primary factors: price, technical capability, and delivery time, with technical capability and delivery time weighted more heavily than price. The evaluation process involves first ranking offers by lowest price, then conducting a technical evaluation to determine if offers are "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" based on meeting solicitation requirements, with a goal of identifying at least three acceptable offers.
The solicitation requires offerors to submit proposals that can complete the flooring replacement project by September 20, 2025, with an "Acceptable" rating contingent on meeting technical specifications and delivery timeline. The final award will be made to the lowest-priced offer that meets technical capabilities and can accomplish the requirement by the specified date. The Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command reserves the right to communicate with offerors, not select a contractor, or re-evaluate the requirement based on the quality of submissions and fund availability.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADDENDUM
52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Nov 2021)
1. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
1.1. Price.
1.2. Technical Capability.
1.3. Delivery time
2. By submission of its offer, the offeror agrees to abide by all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers/Offerors that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be considered non-responsive and/or excluded from consideration. (IAW 52.212-1)
3. Technical Capability and Delivery time, when combined, are considered more important than price.
4. Evaluation Factors and Process Defined:
4.1. First, the Government shall rank all responsive offers by lowest price.
4.1.1. An offeror’s total evaluated price will include the total of all Contract Line Items as outlined in this solicitation or any associated attachments.
4.1.2. The Government reserves the right to deem an offeror's overall quotation to be unresponsive in the event that incomplete, unreasonable, or unbalanced pricing is submitted.
4.2. Second, the Government will conduct a Technical Evaluation, starting with the lowest priced evaluated offer, to determine if they are “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable,” based on the offer/offeror meeting requirements as outlined in the solicitation or any associated attachments.
4.2.1. “Acceptable” means: the description DOES meet the specifications described in the PWS, or associated attachments.
4.2.2. “Unacceptable” means: the description DOES NOT meet the specifications described in the PWS, or associated attachments. An unacceptable technical capability will result in offer/offeror being removed from further consideration.
ADDENDUM
52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Nov 2021)
4.2.3. The Technical Evaluation processing of offers will continue (in order by lowest price) until the Government determines that at least three (3) offerors are determined to have an “Acceptable” technical rating.
4.2.3.1. If there are less than 3 offers/offerors, the Government will perform a Technical
Evaluation on ALL offers/offerors.
4.2.3.2. If no offer/offeror is determined to be “Acceptable,” then no award will be made, and the Contracting Officer will re-evaluate the requirement.
4.3. Third, once the requisite number of offers/offerors have been evaluated for both Price and
Technical Capability, the Government will evaluate based on delivery time. An “Unacceptable” or “Acceptable” rating will be given.
4.3.1. “Unacceptable” means: A delivery date and completion of services, in accordance with the PWS and attached documents, offered after 20 September 2025. An “unacceptable” delivery date will result in offer/offeror being removed from further consideration.
4.3.2. “Acceptable” means: Any delivery date and completion of services, in accordance with the PWS and attached documents, offered on or before 20 September 2025
4.4. An award will be made to the offer/offeror with the lowest price that meets technical capability and can accomplish the requirement by 20 September 2025. This offer/offeror will represent the best value to the Government.
5. The Government reserves the right to communicate with all, some, or none of the offerors to address any issues, if necessary. The Government also reserves the right not to select a contractor, depending on the quality of the offers/offerors submitted and the availability of funds.
6. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before the award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .