Addendum 1~1.pdf
PDF 106 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Signage Request for Bids
- Solicitation number
- S-P00400-00002235
- Issued by
- Multnomah County, Oregon
About this file
This is Addendum 1 to a Request for Bids issued by Mt. Hood Community College (MHCC) in Multnomah County, Oregon, for various printed display graphics and signage solutions. The procurement encompasses multiple graphic types including A-Frame Sign Inserts, Outdoor Yard Signs, Safety Vehicle Vinyl Graphics, Large Outdoor Panels, Outdoor Stage Banners, Blade Directional Signs, Directory Name/Room Replacements, Pathway Wayfinding Blades, Reflective Parking Signs, Removable Fabric Prints, and Backlit Directory Signs. Bidders must submit a one-page cover letter detailing qualifications and experience along with pricing on specified attached sheets. The original bid submission deadline was 5 p.m. on March 10, 2022, with late submissions to be automatically disqualified. The contract term is 36 months with potential renewal options for two consecutive one-year periods.
The evaluation criteria are weighted as follows: price (25%), experience (60%), and sample quality (15%). MHCC reserves the right to determine the lowest responsible bidder for each job-type, indicating flexibility in vendor selection based on specific signage categories. No specific set-aside designations or restrictions for disadvantaged enterprises are mentioned in the procurement documents. No incumbent vendors are identified, and the college maintains sole discretion regarding contract renewal. While a specific budget range is not provided, the comprehensive nature of the request suggests a significant contract value. The procurement is open to graphic design and printing vendors with demonstrated experience in producing institutional signage that meets MHCC's branding and wayfinding requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| MHCC_Display-Graphics-Bid-Request_2022.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADDENDUM #1 TO RFP FOR TRANSER COUNCIL CONSULTANT, HECC #21-092
The purpose of this Addendum #1 is to answer questions HECC has received from vendors.
Question 1: Does Phase 3 require solely the solicitation documentation preparation and creation (Stage Gate 1 and 2)? Can you confirm that this does not include implementation/execution of the suggested IT solution?
Answer 1: Correct, HECC needs assistance as described in Phase III of the RFP, leading up to actual implementation of the IT solution.
Question 2: If a technology provider were to offer support in Phase III, would they be disqualified from competing for the eventual solicitation that is to be released based on this work?
Answer 2: Yes, the successful proposer providing the services described in Phase III will be disqualified from competing on providing the actual IT solution, pursuant to procurement rules.
Question 3: The relatively short time allotted for responding to this RFP presents challenges to vendors.
Will HECC consider extending the RFP timeline?
Answer 3: Unfortunately, in order to make reports and funding requests to the legislature (supported by the services described in Phases I and II), HECC is on a tight timeline and cannot extend this RFP.
Question 4: Is there an organization that HECC is considering for award of this contract? An incumbent?
Answer 4: No, there is no incumbent vendor and HECC does not have a vendor preference.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .