Addendum #1 100622.pdf
PDF 95 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Construction of Vehicle Storage Pole Buildings & Renovation of Existing Pole Building in Kent County, MD
- Solicitation number
- BPM031658
- Issued by
- Kent County, Maryland
About this file
This document is an Addendum #1 issued by the Department of Public Works of Kent County, Maryland regarding a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Construction of Vehicle Storage Pole Buildings and Renovation of an Existing Pole Building. The addendum addresses questions and responses from interested bidders, including the list of firms represented at the pre-proposal conference, requirements for bid surety, mandatory pre-bid meeting attendance, site visits, permits and inspections, specifications for the existing building renovation, and revisions to the insulation requirements for the new buildings. The RFP seeks proposals for the construction of up to two free-standing pole buildings for vehicle storage at two locations within Kent County, as well as proposals to replace metal siding and roofing on an existing pole building. Proposals are due by 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, October 12th, 2022, with the bid opening to proceed at 11:00 a.m. that same day.
The addendum provides clarification on pricing and project execution details, such as the contractor's responsibilities for electrical and concrete work, as well as the County's responsibilities for site preparation and final stone layer placement. The addendum also revises the insulation specification for the new buildings, replacing the requirement for "Solex White Insulation" with a painted 29-gauge steel ceiling liner panel and blown insulation to meet an R-38 value.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP PW 23-01_Facility Vehicle Storage Pole Building_23PWPLBG0423.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS
709 Morgnec Road
Chestertown, MD 21620
410-778-2600
Michael S. Moulds, P.E., Director mmoulds@kentgov.org
CONSTRUCTION OF VEHICLE STORAGE POLE BUILDINGS AND
RENOVATION OF AN EXISTING POLE BUILDING
ADDENDUM NO. 1
October 6, 2022
THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ARE A COMPILATION OF ALL RECEIVED BY EMAIL FROM INTERESTED
BIDDERS RESPONDING TO THE ABOVE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS AND INFORMATION MADE
AVAILABLE AT THE PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE ON SEPTEMBER 28TH. THE QUESTIONS AND
ANSWERS ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
BIDDERS MUST ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS ADDENDUM IN THEIR BIDS.
1. THE FOLLOWING FIRMS WERE REPRESENTED AT THE PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE:
1.A. POLE BUILDING OUTFITTERS
1.B. WARWICK S&E
1.C. DELMARVA BUILDINGS
2. AMOUNT OF BID SURETY? THE BID SURETY TO BE PROVIDED MUST BE 5% OF THE TOTAL BID
SUBMITTAL.
3. MANDATORY PRE-BID MEETING ATTENDANCE? ATTENDANCE IS RECOMMENDED BUT NOT
MANDATORY TO BE ABLE TO SUBMIT A BID.
4. SITE VISIT TO INSPECT EXISTING BUILDING? BIDDERS HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY DURING THE
PRE-BID MEETING AND PRIOR TO THE BID DATE TO ARRANGE FOR A SITE VISIT.
5. ARE COUNTY PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THESE PROJECTS? THE COUNTY
WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTAL OF A SITE PLAN. THE DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL OF BUILDING PERMIT CONSTRUCTION PLANS. PLANS MUST BE SEALED
BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.
5.A. ARE SPRINKLERS AND FIRE MARSHALL REVIEW REQUIRED? THE SUBMISSION FOR
THE BUILDING PERMIT IS SUBMITTED TO THE FIRE MARSHAL FOR REVIEW. THE BID
PROPOSAL SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY REQUIREMENTS FOR SPRINKLERS.
5.B. IS A BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THE EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION? NO.
6. WHAT ARE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE EXISTING POLE BUILDING? THE BUILDING DIMENSIONS
ARE APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET WIDE AND 40 FEET DEEP.
mailto:mmoulds@kentgov.org
Pole Building Construction RFP
Addendum #1
October 6, 2022
7. ARE THE NEW BUILDINGS GETTING INTERIOR CONCRETE SLABS? NO. THE COUNTY WILL
PERFORM SITE PREP TO REMOVE TOPSOIL AND PLACE A STONE WORKING PAD FOR CONSTRUCTION.
FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, THE COUNTY WILL PLACE A FINAL STONE LAYER.
8. RENOVATIONS TO THE EXISTING POLE BUILDING
8.A. ARE THE EXISTING GARAGE DOORS TO BE REPLACED? AS NOTED ON PAGE 21 THE
WORK IS TO INCLUDE “REPLACEMENT OF SIDING ON THE TWO INTERIOR RAIL SLIDING DOORS ON
THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING AND REMOVAL OF THE TWO OUTER RAIL SLIDING DOORS TO BE
REPLACED BY A FRAMED AND SIDED WALL (FIXED POSITION)”. THE INTERIOR RAIL SLIDING DOORS
SHALL USE THE EXISTING HARDWARE.
8.B. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE TO DISCONNECT AND RECONNECT ANY ELECTRICAL
CONNECTIONS TO REPLACE THE METAL SHEETING? PHONE AND WI-FI CONNECTIONS WERE
DISCONNECTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW BUILDING. IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT
THE ELECTRICAL POWER PENETRATION CAN BE FLASHED AROUND A PANEL JOINT.
8.C. THERE IS CONCRETE AT THE BACK CORNER WHERE THE OIL TANKS SIT THAT WILL
NEED TO BE CHIPPED AWAY ENOUGH TO REPLACE THE SIDING. IS THE CONTRACTOR
RESPONSIBLE TO PATCH IT BACK? NO. THE COUNTY CAN ALSO MOVE THE OIL TANK BACK TO
PROVIDE ROOM TO REPLACE THE SIDING IN THIS SECTION.
8.D. THE CHIMNEY FOR THE OIL FURNACE SHOULD HAVE A NEW WALL PENETRATION
THAT CAN BE FLASHED PROPERLY? THE CHIMNEY CAN BE REMOVED TO INSTALL THE NEW SIDING, THEN REINSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH A PENETRATION AND FLASHING.
8.E. THERE IS A ROTTED POST AT THE FRONT CORNER OF THE BUILDING. IS IT TO BE
REPLACED OR WRAPPED OVER? THE POST IS TO BE WRAPPED OVER.
9. NEW BUILDING INSULATION. SECTION 4.E.2. ON PAGE 20 OF THE RFP SPECIFICATIONS IS
REVISED TO DELETE THE “¼” SOLEX WHITE INSULATION” AND SUBSTITUTE THE FOLLOWING:
“CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PAINTED 29 GAUGE STEEL CEILING LINER PANEL AND BLOWN
INSULATION TO MEET AN R-38 VALUE”
END OF ADDENDUM
Mi
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .