A7 SSJ Redacted.pdf

PDF 226 KB Posted

Attached to
USNS WASHINGTON CHAMBERS Emergency Diesel Generator Servicing
Solicitation number
N3220525Q0005
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Sole Source Justification Memorandum outlining the use of other than full and open competition for the acquisition of Emergency Diesel Generator servicing for the USNS Washington Chambers under the simplified acquisition threshold.

The key details are:

  • The requirement is for Kato Engineering Inc. to perform 2.5 year service on the generator side of the Emergency Diesel Generator from 20 November 2024 to 5 December 2024 in San Diego, CA.
  • This is considered a critical ship equipment requirement, and per MSC policy, only the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) or an authorized OEM representative is approved to service this equipment.
  • The procurement is not expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
  • The Sole Source Justification cites the OEM's proprietary rights, exclusive licensing, and MSC's lack of technical data to evaluate non-OEM parts as the basis for the use of other than full and open competition.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
B9 Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation 25Q0005.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1 Ver 2.0 (01 July 2018)

Date: 19 SEP 2024

MEMORANDUM

Subj: USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION FOR AN ACQUISITION UNDER

THE SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD

Ref: (a) USNS Washington Chambers (T-AKE 11) PR Number(s): 1301193419

I. BACKGROUND:

1. In considering the references, FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i) states for purchases not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, Contacting Officers may solicit from one source if the Contracting Officer determines that, under the circumstances of the contract action, only one source is reasonably available (e.g., urgency, exclusive licensing, brand-name, or industrial mobilization).

2. As required by FAR 13.106-3(b)(3)(i), this memorandum explains the absence of competition for this acquisition because only one source will be solicited for this requirement (or for a portion of the requirement) and the requirement is not expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

II. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM OR SERVICE:

1. Provide a description of the item or service required, to include

a) The name of the required source or brand name

Kato Engineering Inc.

b) The required delivery date/period of performance and

POP 20 NOV - 05 DEC 2024

c) Its intended use.

Perform 2.5 year service of the generator side of the Emergency Diesel Generator

2. List the source(s) or known vendor(s) who are able to provide the above described item or service.

Kato Engineering Inc.

PO Box 8447

Mankato, MN 56002

T: (507) 625-4011 or 345-2800

F: (507) 389-4146

Email: katoservice@mail.nidec.com

III. THE DETERMINATION FOR USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION IS BASED

ON THE FOLLOWING (select all that apply):

A. X Only one responsible source (select all that apply):

1. X RESTRICTIVE RIGHTS: the source has established proprietary rights, limited rights in data, patent rights, copyrights, or secret processes in the item or service.

2 Ver 2.0 (01 July 2018)

a. Explain what is subject to the restrictive rights.

Per MSC SMS Procedure 10.6‐002, and QMS N0750-100.00-AQ, the Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) is considered critical and must be maintained by the OEM or an approved OEM. The American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) and US Coast Guard only recognize the servicing of the EDG by the OEM or an authorized OEM Representative. Also, per COMSCINST 4490.1, MSC is directed to use only OEM parts on this critical equipment.

b. If drawings are included, who is identified as “owning” the drawings.

2. EXCLUSIVE LICENSING AGREEMENTS: The item or service is only available from the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), or there is ONLY ONE authorized distributor or technical representative for the OEM.

a. Identify the OEM and explain the circumstances surrounding why the item or service is only available from the OEM.

b. Identify the distributor / authorized technical representative for the item or service.

Provide evidence of the exclusive licensing agreement as an attachment to this document.

(NOTE: If there is more than one distributor / authorized technical representative, then use Part B – Brand Name.)

3. X OTHER REASON:

a. X CRITICAL SHIP EQUIPMENT: The required item is critical ship equipment, the failure of which poses a hazard to the ship, the crew or the environment.

i. SMS Procedure Number: 10.6-002-01-AKE

ii. CRITICAL SHIP EQUIPMENT: EDG is classified as critical equipment and per

COMSC Instruction mandated to use of OEM parts only in this equipment.

b. STANDARDIZATION / BRAND NAME: Per MSCs standardization initiative, only the specified make/model of the equipment/parts will satisfy the Government’s needs for additional units or replacement items.

i. Identify Make / Model Number(s):

ii. Identify other vessels with this Make / Model:

c. _____ FORM, FIT, AND FUNCTION: Item is direct replacement parts / components for existing equipment and must be compatible in terms of form, fit, and function with existing equipment / configurations.

i. Identify Make / Model of existing equipment:

3 Ver 2.0 (01 July 2018)

ii. Describe how the equipment must be compatible with the existing configuration.

d. X OTHER:

MSC DOES NOT HAVE MANUFACTURING AND TECHNICAL

INFORMATION REQUIRED TO EVALUATE AND DETERMINE WHETHER

NON-OEM SERVICE AND REPLACEMENT PARTS OFFERED ARE

EQUIVELANT TO THE OEM COMPONENTS AND REPLACEMENT PARTS.

4. UNUSUAL AND COMPELLING URGENCY: The supplies or services are of such unusual and compelling urgency that the Government would be seriously injured unless the agency is permitted to limit the number of sources from which it solicits. Urgent requirements are supplies or services that will result in work stoppage, or are mission critical and the routine processing time would injure the Government. The determination that the procurement for the above is an urgent and compelling requirement is based on the following:

a. Date on which the requirement was identified:

b. Required delivery date / Period of Performance:

c. If the difference between a. and b. is more than one week, explain the delay in submitting the requirement.

d. Estimated production lead time:

e. Explanation of why delivery / commencement of services by the date required is needed: (explain the impact to the mission, any special circumstances or conditions, etc.)

f. CASREP Number:

IV. ANTICIPATED DOLLAR VALUE OF PROCURMENT: $

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .