A23 RPP_IBP Consortium_20230312_Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement_DRAFT.docx
DOCX document 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- INDUSTRIAL BASE POLICY CONSORTIUM
- Solicitation number
- HQ0034239IBPC
- Issued by
-
DOD Washington Headquarters Service
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 1: PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENTNOTE: GENERAL INFORMATION IS PRESENTED IN (RED FONT) WITH PARENTHESIS BORDERS, FILL-IN GUIDANCE IS PRESENTED IN [BLUE FONT] WITH BRACKET BORDERS. PLEASE DELETE ALL RED AND BLUE FONT WHEN FINALIZING THIS DOCUMENT.
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT
FOR THE
INDUSTRIAL BASE POLICY CONSORTIUM
1.0. BACKGROUND: This Agreement is a 10 United States (U.S.) Code (U.S.C.) § 4022 prototype Other Transaction (OT) award for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (OUSD(A&S)) Defense Assistant Secretary of Defense (DASD) for Industrial Base Resilience (IBR) and the Assistant Secretary of Defense (ASD) Industrial Base Policy (IBP) Manufacturing, Capability Expansion, and Investment Prioritization Directorate (MCEIP), IBP Consortium. [Insert history and/or background information on the requirement.]
2.0. SCOPE: [Insert the scope of proposed solution to be performed/prototype to be developed.]
3.0. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: [Insert the period of performance for all phases.]
4.0. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: [Insert all anticipated locations.]
5.0. SECURITY REQUIREMENT: The COMPANY shall possess and maintain a TOP SECRET facility clearance from the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA). The COMPANY’s employees, performing work in support of this agreement shall have been granted a [TOP SECRET/SECRET] security clearance from the Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office at time of award. The Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification, DD Form 254, will be completed directly following award of this Agreement.
As soon as DCSA’s National Industrial Security Program (NISP) Contracts Classification System (NCCS) is active, the DD Form 254 will be transitioned to NCCS and it will be housed within NCCS through the life of the Agreement. The COMPANY will be required to be registered within NCCS at that time to gain access to the DD Form 254.
6.0. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: [Insert detailed information on what will be accomplished and how.]
6.1. [Fill in].
6.2. [Fill in].
6.3. [Add more for each task].
7.0. DELIVERY SCHEDULE: [Tie delivery schedule back to the Technical Requirements.]
| Technical Requirement # |
| Deliverable |
| Frequency |
| Due Date |
| Delivery Method |
| Associated Data Rights |
| 6.1. |
| Program Kickoff - Briefing Package |
| Once |
| Seven days after award |
| Unlimited Rights |
| 6.2. |
| Quarterly Report |
| Once |
| 3 months after award |
| Unlimited Rights; Government Purpose Rights |
| 6.3 |
| Demonstration of system capabilities at ERSA Development Center |
| Twice |
| End of Phase 2 (February) |
and End of Phase 4
(TBD)
| MS Teams / Email |
| Government Purpose Rights |
8.0. MILESTONE PAYMENT SCHEDULE: [Tie milestone payments back to the Technical Requirements and Delivery Schedule.]
| Milestone # |
| Technical Requirement # |
| Milestone Description |
| Delivery Date |
| Milestone Price |
| 1 |
| 6.1. |
| Program Kickoff Meeting: Program launch meeting with electronic document briefing package submitted. |
| Seven days after award |
| $184,954.00 |
| 2 |
| 6.2. |
| Quarterly Report #1: CFDWARP enhanced with new plasma model and preparation for experiments underway. |
| 3 months after award |
| $269,908.00 |
| 3 |
| 6.5. |
| Quarterly Report #2: Completed validation of CFDWARP code |
| 9 months after award |
| $184,954.00 |
9.0. SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION CRITERIA: This agreement, or portions thereof, will be considered successfully completed upon (1) acceptance of funded milestones identified under Section 8.0 of the Performance Work Statement, (2) Government receipt and acceptance of deliverables, and (3) the delivery and demonstration of the prototype.
The following table provides the criteria for successful completion. Upon receipt of delivery, with associated functional testing documentation indicating proper functionality of those prototypes, the Government will make a determination of acceptance. The acceptance thresholds briefly describe the minimum acceptable standards for successful completion. These thresholds are critical to the success of the prototype project.
| Milestone # |
| Technical Requirement # |
| Definition of Successful Completion |
| Acceptance Threshold |
| Method of Acceptance |
| Acceptance Date |
| 1 |
| 6.1 |
| Successful utilization of the prototype hydrogen fuel cell to power the aircraft in flight. |
| Sustained flight. |
| Verification via |
Flight Test
NLT
September 30, 2023
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .