A22_Evaluation_Criteria_for_2022_Biedell_Thinning.pdf

1 | P a g e

Evaluation Criteria for Biedell Creek Thinning FY22

Company Name _____________________________________________

Reviewed by: _____________________

The evaluation will be based according to the listed criteria, and given a number according to the numbering system. Please rank each item below using the following ratings: for 1Unsatisfactory, 2

Marginal, 3 Satisfactory, 4 Very Good, and 5 Exceptional

Proposal:

Treatment Plan:

Comments:

1:Unsatisfactory 2: Marginal 3:Satisfactory 4:Very Good 5:Exceptional

Quality Control Plan:

1:Unsatisfactory 2: Marginal 3:Satisfactory 4:Very Good 5:Exceptional

Safety Plan:

1:Unsatisfactory 2: Marginal 3:Satisfactory 4:Very Good 5:Exceptional

2 | P a g e

Record of Past Performance

Complete work in a timely manner:

1:Unsatisfactory 2: Marginal 3:Satisfactory 4: Very Good 5:Exceptional

Quality of final product post treatment:

Overall contractor performance: (Would you work with this contractor again?)

3 | P a g e

Organization and Equipment

Personnel:

Equipment:

The scoring method will be on a scale of

1 Points (Unsatisfactory) to 5 Points (Exceptional) for a maximum total score of 35

Price will be considered last and will be factored in the final narrative

Evaluation

Overall Total Score: ________ out of 45

Explanation:

Overall explanation of quality of the Proposal, contractor, and price:

4 | P a g e