A13 - JA - PR 85533 Award.pdf

Template for Justification and Approval for Other Than Full and Open Competition Completion Instructions: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has established a standard template for the preparation of a J&A for Other Than Full and Open Competition. If this is an 8(a) set-aside, please note this form is not required unless the acquisition is valued (including all options) at greater than $22 million. This template is NOT applicable for actions using simplified acquisition procedures (FAR Part 13), Federal Supply Schedule orders (FAR 8.4) or task or delivery orders subject to fair opportunity (FAR 16.505).

Tailor all aspects of this template to the individual acquisition. Consult FAR Subpart 6.3 for guidance. An addendum may be added in case additional space is needed.

When this document is printed, the blue italic instructions are automatically deleted on the printed version.

JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Acquisition Title: Toxicological Profile Preparation for Hazardous Substances and Related Documents, Task Order 10

Agency: CDC

Acquisition Year (FY): 2024

Author and Title: Nickolette Roney

2. Description of Action:

Nature: New Requirement Follow-on Requirement

Modification to Existing Purchase Order/Contract Number:

Pricing: Firm-Fixed Price Time & Materials Cost

Other:

Funds: OMA Other Funds:

Name of Proposed Contractor(s): SRC, Inc.

Street Address: 7502 Round Pond Rd

City, State, Zip: North Syracuse, NY 13212-2558

3. Description of Services or Supplies:

Basis for Approval (FAR 6.303-1(d)): Individual Basis Class Basis

The total estimated value of the proposed action, including all options is $ 399,954.50

As applicable, briefly describe the services or supplies required to meet the agency's needs, including make & model number where appropriate. Include quantities of supplies or period of performance for services. Provide information for any options included. If the action is a modification to an existing contract, distinguish clearly between the work covered by the original contract and the work to be obtained by the proposed modification.

This procurement is for the preparation of final toxicological profiles and associated documents. The development of toxicological profiles and other scientific documents supports federal, state and local health professionals, public health assessors, and numerous groups and individuals in understanding the potential for human exposure to various hazardous substances. This task order is to prepare the final toxicological profile documents for which the draft for public comment has already been prepared. This is a continuing of a prior task order under IDIQ 75D30118D96349 75D30122F00015.

4. Authority and Rationale: Identify the statutory authority, FAR title and FAR citation permitting other than full and open competition. It may be one of the following most commonly used citations by the operating divisions of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), but other exceptions may apply per FAR Subpart 6.3.

Actions other than simplified acquisition procedures (select only one and provide an explanation):

FAR 6.302-1: Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements, 41 U.S.C.

3304(a)(1)

Explain why the intended contractor is the only responsible source who can provide the required supplies or services.

Discuss the unique capabilities, expertise, etc. that support the lack of competition/why no other type of supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements. Explain factors/unique qualifications such as proprietary data or exclusive licensing rights, if applicable. When competition is limited to items particular to one manufacturer, this justification must explain why the particular brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government's requirements, and that market research indicates other companies' similar products, or products lacking the particular feature, do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet the agency's needs in accordance with FAR 11.105. If in connection with a follow-on contract for continued development or production of highly specialized equipment, detail the substantial duplication of cost or unacceptable delays. May not Exceed one year, including all options, unless the head of the agency (Secretary of HHS) determines that exceptional circumstances apply.

Due to the highly complex and technically specialized nature of the Toxicological Profile for Perfluoroalkyls, using the same contractor (SRC) to finalize documents for which they already prepared draft (for public comment) version will be lowest risk and most beneficial to the government and public interest. The project is already 2 years into the work and the full final product is not delivered, so the work is not really finished. Starting fresh with a new contractor on previous work will substantially lengthen the start up time, while remaining with SRC will benefit the government because it will reduce the time required to start work on these documents since the contractor can seamlessly begin work on the finalization of these technical documents that they already drafted. Also, since they prepared the draft documents, this contractor will be much more efficient in preparing the final documents because they have already reviewed all the scientific studies and abstracted the information from these studies to prepare the documents. An alternative vendor would need to re-check all of that work, adding time, cost, and risk of error. In addition, this contractor developed the database used for tox profile work for perfluoroalkyls and it will be most efficient to use them for the supporting work for this database. In contrast, transitioning to a new contractor risks failure of performance in a number of areas.

The lack of familiarity and history with this work risks a failure to fully understand the data and history, meaning they may not be successful in finishing the final documents. This risks errors that undermine the scientific credibility. This risks increased start up time to get a handle on a product midway through, like a 2nd manufacturing trying to finish a car a previous manufacturer started.

This also all means that it will increase costs. While that is often not a major factor in a J&A, in this instance, it could be significant.

The previous draft of the Toxicological Profile for Perfluoroalkys was prepared under previous task order 75D30118D96349 75D30122F00015. Although we call it Task Order 20 from the overall 2018 IDIQ; this is logical follow-on work to that task as a project, thought this FAR authority is used since that IDIQ is no longer in operation and thus cannot be used as a contract vehicle for a follow-on.

FAR 6.302-2: Unusual and compelling urgency, 41 U.S.C. 3304(a)(2) If unusual and compelling urgency is the basis for the justification, explain the chronological events leading up to the requirement and explain why time constraints cannot permit even a limited competition. Describe the detrimental effects/ serious injury to the mission of the requiring activity or to the government, financial or otherwise, that will result if this justification is not approved. Describe impact of required delivery/performance date. Describe the detrimental effects/serious injury to the mission of the requiring activity or to the government, financial or otherwise, that will result if this justification is not approved and the product or service cannot be provided by the intended sole source contractor. Failure to plan for expiring funds is not a valid reason for citing this exception. May not exceed one year, including all options, unless the head of the agency determines that exceptional circumstances apply.

FAR 6.302-5: Authorized or Required by Statute, 41 U.S.C. 3304(a)(5) Provide a citation to the statutory authorization and a brief description of its content, or identify the specified source or other agency.

Other (See FAR Subpart 6.3 for additional authority) Provide the authority and citation to the applicable section of FAR 6.3.

Provide a full explanation to justify use of the exception.

5. Agency Actions to Take or Remove Barriers That Led to Other Than Full and Open Competition (If applicable):

Describe the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to the restricted consideration prior to any subsequent acquisition for the supplies of services is made. If no such actions have been taken, explain why.

There is a multiple award BPA in place for the preparation of toxicological profiles. If a similar requirement arises in the future, every effort will be made to compete it to the maximum extent possible.

While generally, the work on these BPAs is competed, this need extends from a task order on the previous IDIQ and the work there is not finished. Due to the end of the IDIQ, that task order cannot be extended so a new task order is being award to complete the work and expand some of the intimately related new work connected to it.

6. Bridge Contracts:

For contract extensions or bridge contracts when a competitive follow-on is in the process of being developed, summarize history of current contract and explain the reasons for any delays in the acquisition. Include discussion of the milestones for the follow-on action; the milestones should be as efficient as possible. Discuss why it would be neither cost effective nor realistic to expect another contractor to perform during the brief interim period; include issues such as start-up costs, phase-in, transfer of GFP, recruitment and staffing, etc. If the action is because of a protest, provide a brief discussion of the protest including the date the protest was filed and the basis of the protest. Explain that the action will provide the minimum quantity or performance period.

Not applicable

7. Actions to Increase Competition:

Describe efforts made to compete the action, including whether a notice was or will be publicized as required by FAR Subpart

5.2 or which exception under FAR 5.202 applies. If a notice was publicized, discuss the number of written responses to the synopsis and the results of the assessment of the written responses. List sources, if any, that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition. Provide rationale if interested sources were rejected. If applicable, state that no other sources have expressed interest, but all offers received shall be considered. Describe what actions will be taken to increase competition before subsequent acquisition of the supplies or services is required. You may state that an action is a one-time requirement, but if a similar requirement arises, every effort will be made to compete it to the maximum extent possible. If action is sole source because of proprietary data or licensing rights and there will be a continuing need for the requirement, there must be evidence that advanced planning has been initiated to overcome the barriers to competition, or there should be documentation to support an analysis that replacement costs/licensing purchase costs outweigh the benefits of competition.

If the action is a contract extension or bridge, explain actions to compete the follow-on. If action is an urgent new requirement and a competitive follow-on is anticipated, explain that efforts are underway to facilitate a full and open competition.

While generally, the work on these BPAs is competed, this need extends from a task order on the previous IDIQ and the work there is not finished. Due to the end of the IDIQ, that task order cannot be extended so a new task order is being award to complete the work and expand some of the intimately related new work connected to it. There is a multiple award BPA in place for the preparation of toxicological profiles. If a similar requirement arises in the future, every effort will be made to compete it to the maximum extent possible.

8. Market Research:

Describe the extent of the market research conducted to identify all qualified sources and the results thereof. “Market Research” is defined as those attempts you made to ascertain whether other qualified sources exist, and can include contact with knowledgeable experts regarding similar or duplicate requirements, contact with industry, results of a sources sought synopsis, or draft solicitations. Research of the marketplace may consist of written, electronic (i.e. email) telephonic, or world wide web inquiries. Lack of advanced planning is not an acceptable reason for the lack of market research, but true urgency may necessitate abbreviated market research that is limited to readily available historical and commercial information. If action is a contract extension or bridge contract, describe the market research efforts underway or completed for the follow-

on. See FAR 10.002(b)(2).

This acquisition is for a task order under the current multiple award BPA awarded in 2023 (contract 75D301-23-A-17950) which utilizes individual task orders to provide technical assistance services for the development of toxicological profiles and other scientific documents. The BPA procurement was solicited as a General Services Administration (GSA) multiple award schedule (MAS). NAICS code are 541620 and 541690, Environmental Consulting Services and Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services, respectively. Request for Quotation (RFQ) Number 75D301-23-Q-76466 was announced in July 2023 through the GSA eBuy website. In March 2023 (close date 3/24), GSA posted a request for information (RFI) from potential vendors. GSA undertook market research as a service (MRAS) and the market research report for the base BPA. Four proposals were received for the BPA and all vendors were deemed acceptable – Abt Associates; Eastern Research Group (ERG), Inc; ICF, Inc; and SRC, Inc.

9. Procurement History:

Purchase order or contract number: The previous task order in ICE is TO15: 75D30118D96349 75D30122F00015 (Tox 20)

Was action competed? Yes No

If action was not competed, state the cited authority, summarize rationale, and describe the actions that were supposed to be taken to increase competition and the results thereof:

10. Additional Information to support the justification:

If applicable, explain why technical packages or specifications to facilitate competition were not developed or available;

describe actions taken to remedy the situation.

This item was considered and determined not applicable.

11. Technical / Requirements Certification: By my signature below, I certify that the supporting data included in this J&A is accurate and complete.

Program Manager

Name: Nickolette Roney

Position Title: Health Scientist

Email address: nroney@cdc.gov

Phone: 770-488-3332

Program Manager Supervisor (or one level above Program Manager)

Name: Henry Abadin

Position Title: Chief, Toxicology Section

Email address: habadin@cdc.gov

Signature:

Date:

12. Fair and Reasonable Price/Cost Determination: As Contracting Officer, by my signature below, I hereby determine that the anticipated price/cost to the Government for this contract action will be fair and reasonable.

Provide the basis for this determination, e.g., describe techniques to be used to determine fair and reasonable price (FAR Subpart 15.402), such as price analysis, cost analysis, cost realism. Per FAR Subpart 15.403-4(a)(1), the threshold for obtaining cost or pricing data is $750,000.

This award will be made off of BPA Pricing predetermined to be fair and reasonable. It will be compared to prior awards and the

IGCE.

Name: David Smythe Phone: 770-488-2782

Signature: Date:

13. Contracting Officer's Approval (Required for proposed contract not to exceed $700,000 (value calculated including all options)): I hereby certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I approve this justification subject to availability of funds, and provided that the services and supplies herin describe have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.

Name: Phone:

Signature: Date:

14. Legal Review:

All J&As greater than $68 million must have a legal review from the General Law Division of the Office of the General Counsel prior to sending it to the Department.

15. OPDIV Competition Advocate Approval (Required for proposed contract over $700,000 but not exceeding $13.5 million value calculated including all options)):

I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports other than full and open competition.

Name: Phone:

Signature: Date:

16. Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization:

I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports other than full and open competition.

Name: Phone:

Signature: Date:

17. OPDIV HCA Approval (Required for proposed contract over $13.5 million but not exceeding $68 million value calculated including all options)):

Name: Phone:

Signature: Date:

18. Department Competition Advocate:

Concur: Non-Concur:

Name: Phone:

(The below approval paragraph is required if the cumulative contract value, including all options, exceeds $68 million.)

19. HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) Approval:

Based on the foregoing justification, I hereby approve other than full and open competition for the above stated procurement, subject to the availability of funds, and provided that the services herein described have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.

State supplies/services being procured:

This procurement is for the preparation of final toxicological profiles and associated documents. The development of toxicological profiles and other scientific documents supports federal, state and local health professionals, public health assessors, and numerous groups and individuals in understanding the potential for human exposure to various hazardous substances. This task order is to prepare the final toxicological profile documents for which the draft for public comment has already been prepared. This is a continuing of a prior task order under IDIQ 75D30118D96349 75D30122F00015.

State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304:

Name: Phone:

Template for Justification and Approval for Other Than Full and Open Competition Completion Instructions: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has established a standard template for the preparation of a J&A for Other Than Full and Open Competition. If this is an 8(a) set-aside, please note this form is not required unless the acquisition is valued (including all options) at greater than $22 million. This template is NOT applicable for actions using simplified acquisition procedures (FAR Part 13), Federal Supply Schedule orders (FAR 8.4) or task or delivery orders subject to fair opportunity (FAR 16.505).

Tailor all aspects of this template to the individual acquisition. Consult FAR Subpart 6.3 for guidance. An addendum may be added in case additional space is needed.

When this document is printed, the blue italic instructions are automatically deleted on the printed version.

JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

2. Description of Action:

Nature:

Pricing:

Funds:

3. Description of Services or Supplies:

Basis for Approval (FAR 6.303-1(d)):

As applicable, briefly describe the services or supplies required to meet the agency's needs, including make & model number where appropriate. Include quantities of supplies or period of performance for services. Provide information for any options included. If the action is a modification to an existing contract, distinguish clearly between the work covered by the original contract and the work to be obtained by the proposed modification.

4. Authority and Rationale: Identify the statutory authority, FAR title and FAR citation permitting other than full and open competition. It may be one of the following most commonly used citations by the operating divisions of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), but other exceptions may apply per FAR Subpart 6.3.

Actions other than simplified acquisition procedures (select only one and provide an explanation):

Explain why the intended contractor is the only responsible source who can provide the required supplies or services. Discuss the unique capabilities, expertise, etc. that support the lack of competition/why no other type of supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements. Explain factors/unique qualifications such as proprietary data or exclusive licensing rights, if applicable. When competition is limited to items particular to one manufacturer, this justification must explain why the particular brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government's requirements, and that market research indicates other companies' similar products, or products lacking the particular feature, do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet the agency's needs in accordance with FAR 11.105. If in connection with a follow-on contract for continued development or production of highly specialized equipment, detail the substantial duplication of cost or unacceptable delays. May not Exceed one year, including all options, unless the head of the agency (Secretary of HHS) determines that exceptional circumstances apply.

If unusual and compelling urgency is the basis for the justification, explain the chronological events leading up to the requirement and explain why time constraints cannot permit even a limited competition. Describe the detrimental effects/serious injury to the mission of the requiring activity or to the government, financial or otherwise, that will result if this justification is not approved. Describe impact of required delivery/performance date. Describe the detrimental effects/serious injury to the mission of the requiring activity or to the government, financial or otherwise, that will result if this justification is not approved and the product or service cannot be provided by the intended sole source contractor. Failure to plan for expiring funds is not a valid reason for citing this exception. May not exceed one year, including all options, unless the head of the agency determines that exceptional circumstances apply.

Provide a citation to the statutory authorization and a brief description of its content, or identify the specified source or other agency.

Provide the authority and citation to the applicable section of FAR 6.3.

Provide a full explanation to justify use of the exception.

5. Agency Actions to Take or Remove Barriers That Led to Other Than Full and Open Competition (If applicable):

Describe the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to the restricted consideration prior to any subsequent acquisition for the supplies of services is made. If no such actions have been taken, explain why.

6. Bridge Contracts:

For contract extensions or bridge contracts when a competitive follow-on is in the process of being developed, summarize history of current contract and explain the reasons for any delays in the acquisition. Include discussion of the milestones for the follow-on action; the milestones should be as efficient as possible. Discuss why it would be neither cost effective nor realistic to expect another contractor to perform during the brief interim period; include issues such as start-up costs, phase-in, transfer of GFP, recruitment and staffing, etc. If the action is because of a protest, provide a brief discussion of the protest including the date the protest was filed and the basis of the protest. Explain that the action will provide the minimum quantity or performance period.

7. Actions to Increase Competition:

Describe efforts made to compete the action, including whether a notice was or will be publicized as required by FAR Subpart 5.2 or which exception under FAR 5.202 applies. If a notice was publicized, discuss the number of written responses to the synopsis and the results of the assessment of the written responses. List sources, if any, that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition. Provide rationale if interested sources were rejected. If applicable, state that no other sources have expressed interest, but all offers received shall be considered. Describe what actions will be taken to increase competition before subsequent acquisition of the supplies or services is required. You may state that an action is a one-time requirement, but if a similar requirement arises, every effort will be made to compete it to the maximum extent possible. If action is sole source because of proprietary data or licensing rights and there will be a continuing need for the requirement, there must be evidence that advanced planning has been initiated to overcome the barriers to competition, or there should be documentation to support an analysis that replacement costs/licensing purchase costs outweigh the benefits of competition. If the action is a contract extension or bridge, explain actions to compete the follow-on. If action is an urgent new requirement and a competitive follow-on is anticipated, explain that efforts are underway to facilitate a full and open competition.

8. Market Research:

Describe the extent of the market research conducted to identify all qualified sources and the results thereof. “Market Research” is defined as those attempts you made to ascertain whether other qualified sources exist, and can include contact with knowledgeable experts regarding similar or duplicate requirements, contact with industry, results of a sources sought synopsis, or draft solicitations. Research of the marketplace may consist of written, electronic (i.e. email) telephonic, or world wide web inquiries. Lack of advanced planning is not an acceptable reason for the lack of market research, but true urgency may necessitate abbreviated market research that is limited to readily available historical and commercial information. If action is a contract extension or bridge contract, describe the market research efforts underway or completed for the follow-on. See FAR 10.002(b)(2).

9. Procurement History:

Was action competed?

If action was not competed, state the cited authority, summarize rationale, and describe the actions that were supposed to be taken to increase competition and the results thereof:

10. Additional Information to support the justification:

If applicable, explain why technical packages or specifications to facilitate competition were not developed or available; describe actions taken to remedy the situation.

11. Technical / Requirements Certification: By my signature below, I certify that the supporting data included in this J&A is accurate and complete.

Program Manager Name:

Position Title:

Email address:

Phone:

Program Manager Supervisor (or one level above Program Manager) Name:

Position Title:

Email address:

Signature:

Date:

12. Fair and Reasonable Price/Cost Determination: As Contracting Officer, by my signature below, I hereby determine that the anticipated price/cost to the Government for this contract action will be fair and reasonable.

Provide the basis for this determination, e.g., describe techniques to be used to determine fair and reasonable price (FAR Subpart 15.402), such as price analysis, cost analysis, cost realism. Per FAR Subpart 15.403-4(a)(1), the threshold for obtaining cost or pricing data is $750,000.

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

13. Contracting Officer's Approval (Required for proposed contract not to exceed $700,000 (value calculated including all options)): I hereby certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I approve this justification subject to availability of funds, and provided that the services and supplies herin describe have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

14. Legal Review:

All J&As greater than $68 million must have a legal review from the General Law Division of the Office of the General Counsel prior to sending it to the Department.

15. OPDIV Competition Advocate Approval (Required for proposed contract over $700,000 but not exceeding $13.5 million value calculated including all options)):

I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports other than full and open competition.

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

16. Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization:

I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports other than full and open competition.

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

17. OPDIV HCA Approval (Required for proposed contract over $13.5 million but not exceeding $68 million value calculated including all options)):

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

18. Department Competition Advocate:

Concur:

Non-Concur:

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

(The below approval paragraph is required if the cumulative contract value, including all options, exceeds $68 million.)

19. HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) Approval:

Based on the foregoing justification, I hereby approve other than full and open competition for the above stated procurement, subject to the availability of funds, and provided that the services herein described have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.

State supplies/services being procured:

State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304:

State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304 Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

11.0.0.20130303.1.892433.887364 Justification & Approval - Other Than Full and Open Competition Health and Human Services Justification & Approval - Other Than Full and Open Competition

While generally, the work on these BPAs is competed, this need extends from a task order on the previous IDIQ and the work there is not finished. Due to the end of the IDIQ, that task order cannot be extended so a new task order is being award to complete the work and expand some of the intimately related new work connected to it.

The previous draft of the Toxicological Profile for Perfluoroalkys was prepared under previous task order 75D30118D96349 75D30122F00015. Although we call it Task Order 20 from the overall 2018 IDIQ; this is logical follow-on work to that task as a project, thought this FAR authority is used since that IDIQ is no longer in operation and thus cannot be used as a contract vehicle for a follow-on.