999M Fuels MATOC Sources Sought May 2024.pdf

Sources Sought Response Form W9128F-24-S-S001

Fuels Design-Build (DB) / Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Construction Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC)

Purpose: By the way of this Market Survey/Sources Sought Notice, the USACE-Omaha District intends to determine the extent of capable firms that are engaged in providing the services described hereunder. The responses to this Notice will be used for planning purposes for upcoming procurements; therefore, this Notice does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP), Quotation or Bid; it does not guarantee the future issue of a RFP; nor does it commit the government to contract for any supply or service. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, QUOTATION OR BID. NO SOLICITATION IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.

Further, this Agency will not accept unsolicited proposals. Respondents are advised that this Agency will not pay for any information or administrative cost incurred in response to this Notice;

all costs associated with responding to this Notice will be solely at the responding party's expense. At this time, proprietary information is not being requested, and respondents shall refrain from providing proprietary information in response to this Sources Sought Notice.

Intent: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Omaha District (NWO) intends to pursue two

(2) awards of Petroleum, Oils, and Lubricants (POL) Facilities Infrastructure, Design-Build / Design-Bid-Build Construction, Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) for the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) and other customers, located at facilities within the Continental United States (CONUS), Alaska, Hawaii, and outlying areas. Per FAR part 2, "outlying areas" is defined as (1) Commonwealths (Puerto Rico; The Northern Mariana Islands); (2) Territories (American Samoa; Guam; U.S. Virgin Islands); and (3) Minor outlying islands (Baker Island, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Islands, Navassa Island, Palmyra Atoll, and Wake Atoll).

The government's intent is to select competent contractors that can reliably provide high-quality fuels infrastructure projects meeting stringent Department of Defense (DoD) requirements as specified in the Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS).

Work anticipated under these MATOCs primarily includes, but is not limited to: replacement of aging fuel infrastructure and/or components, repair of storage tanks and containment areas, POL system upgrades and maintenance (modernization), facility demolition, construction of fuels support facilities, regulatory compliance, and design to support the construction work projects.

Construction work will be completed in compliance with all state and federal regulations and USACE guidance.

In accordance with FAR 36.204 - Disclosure of the Magnitude of Construction Projects, the anticipated magnitude of task orders is between $250,000.00 and $10,000,000.00, with an anticipated average task order amount of $2,500,000.00. The North American Industry Classification System code for this procurement is 237120 - Oil and Gas Pipeline and Related Structures Construction, which has a small business size standard of $45,000,000.00.

Small businesses are reminded under FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting that for general construction, they will not pay more than 85 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance, excluding the cost of materials, to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities.

Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count toward the 85 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded.

The capability and capacity statement package must demonstrate and address:

- Provide information for no more than three (3) of the most recent contracts your firm has performed within the last seven (7) years. Contracts must be same or similar to the work described in this announcement. Include a reference for each contract (name, address, telephone number, and e-mail address). Experience should include magnitude, scope, and complexity of projects performed within the last three years including; Contract number, organization supported, scope of work, whether the offeror was a prime contractor or subcontractor, contract value, Government point of contact with a current telephone number, and a brief description of how the contract referenced relates to the services described herein. Also, provide a brief description of the work performed, role of the contractor to include whether the work was self-performed, contract number, total contract value, and period of performance.

Please complete this form and return to the individuals on the right by 30-May-2024.

Tyler.Hegge@usace.army.mil Jennifer.C.Gilbreath@usace.army.mil

State whether your firm is classified by the Small Business Administration as any of the following:

Small Business Small Disadvantaged Business Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Section 8(a) Women Owned Small Business (WOSB) HUB Zone Other Than Small Business (OTSB)

General Questions

Yes No N/A

Interested in performing as a Prime Contractor under the proposed

MATOC.

Likely team with another company to perform work under the proposed

MATOC.

Likely to pursue a joint-venture relationship or some other formal teaming arrangement?

Unique Entity Identifier (UEI)

Firm Name

Address

Cage Code

Web Site URL

Phone #Point of Contact

E-mail

Currently registered in System of Award Management (SAM)?

Can your firm complete work under NAICS Code 237120?

Yes

No

Approximately how many employees does your company have?

Assuming projects are not co-located, how many projects could your company simultaneously execute?

What is the approximate dollar value range of individual contracts typically awarded to your company?

In addition to the above, the Government requests comments from interested parties to the following questions:

In addition to the above, the Government requests comments from interested parties to the following questions:

In addition to the above, the Government requests comments from interested parties to the following questions:

1. Would your firm be interested in submitting a proposal considering the anticipated scope of work items? If not, why not?

2. If your firm is a small busines, would you consider submitting a proposal as a prime contractor?

3. What is the minimum and maximum dollar value project for which your firm is likely to consider submitting a proposal?

4. What is the maximum bonding capacity of your firm?

5. What maximum annual capacity of work can your firm reasonably manage while assuring effective and efficient program/project implementation and maintaining quality products?

6. What is your firm’s resource availability (Staffing and Equipment) to perform the work?

7. What elements of work would your firm consider subcontracting to other firms?

8. Address your firm’s capability to execute the anticipated geographic scope of the MATOC, i.e.

CONUS, Alaska, Hawaii, and Outlying Areas as defined by the FAR.

9. What do you consider are the most critical criteria that would distinguish one company’s capabilities from/over another? Explain.

Provide comments, or identify any concerns your company has regarding the proposed solicitation in the area below: