Past Performance Questionnaire 20200320.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Accounting and Financial Support Services
- Solicitation number
- 9531BP20R0003
- Issued by
-
Federal Election Commission
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Contractor NDA .docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions and Answers for 9531BP20R0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| COI Doc.docx | DOCX document | |
| Synopsis for Accounting Support V12.docx | DOCX document | |
| Synopsis for Accounting Support V11.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Quote
9531BP20R0003
Past Performance Questionnaire The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is requesting your assistance in establishing the performance history of vendors who can provide __________________________.
Your rating and comments will provide insight and assist in FEC’s evaluation.
Return your completed questionnaire directly to Contract Specialist/ CO Anita Freeman, via email: afreeman@fec.gov. Please return by 03/20/2020.
Evaluator Information:
Company Name:
Company Address:
Your Name:
Title:
Dollar value of your current contract:
Please use the following definitions to assess contractor performance.
Past Performance Rating
| Adjective |
| Description |
| High Level Of Confidence |
| The Offeror’s recent and relevant past performance is very relevant to this acquisition; demonstrating very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance. Based on the Offeror’s performance record, there is a high level of confidence that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Moderate Level of Confidence |
| The Offeror’s recent and relevant past performance is relevant to this acquisition, and it demonstrates effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable problems, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. Based on the Offeror’s performance record, there is a moderate level of confidence that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Low Level of Confidence |
| The Offeror’s recent and relevant past performance is at least somewhat relevant to this acquisition, and it meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. Based on the Offeror’s performance record, there is a low level of confidence that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the Offeror’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements. |
| No Confidence |
| The Offeror’s recent and relevant past performance is not relevant to this acquisition, and does not meet the minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable substantial effects on overall performance. Based on the Offeror’s performance record, there is no confidence that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort |
| Neutral |
| In the case of an Offeror without a record of recent and relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance [see FAR 15.305(a) (2) (ii), and (iv).] |
Circle your choice below and please provide comments supporting your rating.
1. What is your assessment of the contractor’s quality of service (compliance with contract requirements, conformance to standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, technical excellence, customer satisfaction, etc.)?
High Level of Confidence Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral Comments:
2. What is your assessment of the contractor’s timeliness of performance (reliability, responsiveness to technical direction, adherence to contract schedule, etc)? Did the contractor respond to service calls and supply orders in the timeframe specified in the contract requirements? Is the contractor able to provide support to remote locations? Do technicians possess the experience and expertise necessary to maintain and service the equipment?
High Level of Confidence Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral
3. What is your assessment of the contractor’s business relations (contract management, business-like correspondence, notification of problems and problem resolution, etc.)?
High Level of Confidence Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral
4. What is your assessment of the contractor’s invoicing procedures and policies? Does the contractor submit invoices accurately and timely? Is the billing staff proactive in resolving billing discrepancies? High Level of Confidence Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral
5. What is your assessment of the contractor’s personnel management? Is the contractor’s work force properly trained and given proper direction? Are required tasks successfully performed? High Level of Confidence Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral
6. What is your assessment of the contractor’s management of subcontractors? Do the subcontractors still meet the requirements specified in the contract? Does the contractor resolve any issues with the subcontractors in a timely manner?
High Level of Confidence Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .