Attachment 5 TEP workbook.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 44 KB Posted

Attached to
Lead-Based Paint Evaluation Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
86614120R00001
Issued by
Department of Housing and Urban Development

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Lead-Based Paint Evaluation Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
HUD response to LBP Draft Solicitation questions.docx DOCX document
Lead Based Paint PWS 1-21.pdf PDF
draft_Sol_86614120R00001.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Instructions This workbook includes four (4) Total Evalauted Price (TEP) worksheets, one for each Homeownership Center (HOC): Atlanta (AHOC), (DHOC), (PHOC), and (SAHOC). Offerors are encouraged to submit multiple offers presenting offers for more than one of the Homeownership Centers (HOCs), if an offeror is capable of providing services within the entire geographic areas of that HOC. To be considered for award, an offeror must demonstrate they are capable of providing all of the services within the entire geographic area of the HOC for which they are proposing.

Step 1: Select HOC worksheet for which your firm intends on submitting an offer. The Proposal Letter referenced for that corresponding HOC will also be referenced with the title uised on the written proposal(s) and must be consistent with the submission of the email subject line requirements: FOUO\\INFO: Insert Solicitation Number, Company Name/Proposal and Name of HOC/Offer.

Step 2: In Column "E" provide the corresponding CLIN Firm-Fixed Prices (FFP). All FFP must be rounded to the nearest dollar. The Proposal Worksheets inlcude math to develop the TEP. No further action is needed on Proposal Worksheets.

Step 3: Provide pricing data in the "Supporting Math Data" and "Supporting Narrative" worksheets. If you need a conintuation worksheet for either one of those to supporting worksheets, you may create another worksheet. Further instructions are provided within each worksheet.

Proposal A "AHOC" Atlanta HOC (AHOC): Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands

CLINDescription of Supply or ServiceMax qtyFFP**Total= BEQ Units * FFP
Year 1
0001AVisual Assessments1,350$0
0002ALead-Based Paint Inspections950$0
0003AStabilization Plans575$0
0004AClearance Examinations575$0
0005AClearance Re-Examinations300$0
Year 2
0006AVisual Assessments1,500$0
0007ALead-Based Paint Inspections1,050$0
0008AStabilization Plans625$0
0009AClearance Examinations625$0
0010AClearance Re-Examinations325$0
Year 3
0011AVisual Assessments1,650$0
0012ALead-Based Paint Inspections1,150$0
0013AStabilization Plans700$0
0014AClearance Examinations700$0
0015AClearance Re-Examinations350$0
Year 4
0016AVisual Assessments1,825$0
0017ALead-Based Paint Inspections1,275$0
0018AStabilization Plans775$0
0019AClearance Examinations775$0
0020AClearance Re-Examinations375$0
Year 5
0021AVisual Assessments2,000$0
0022ALead-Based Paint Inspections1,400$0
0023AStabilization Plans850$0
0024AClearance Examinations850$0
0025AClearance Re-Examinations425$0
*Total Estimated FFP dollar value = Cumulative total of last column$0
**All Firm-Fixed Prices (FFP) must be rounded to the nearest dollar.

Proposal B "DHOC" Denver HOC (DHOC): Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana

CLINDescription of Supply or ServiceMax qtyFFP**Total= BEQ Units * FFP
Year 1
0001BVisual Assessments725$0
0002BLead-Based Paint Inspections725$0
0003BStabilization Plans350$0
0004BClearance Examinations250$0
0005BClearance Re-Examinations100$0
Year 2
0006BVisual Assessments800$0
0007BLead-Based Paint Inspections800$0
0008BStabilization Plans400$0
0009BClearance Examinations275$0
0010BClearance Re-Examinations110$0
Year 3
0011BVisual Assessments850$0
0012BLead-Based Paint Inspections850$0
0013BStabilization Plans425$0
0014BClearance Examinations300$0
0015BClearance Re-Examinations125$0
Year 4
0016BVisual Assessments950$0
0017BLead-Based Paint Inspections950$0
0018BStabilization Plans475$0
0019BClearance Examinations325$0
0020BClearance Re-Examinations130$0
Year 5
0021BVisual Assessments1,050$0
0022BLead-Based Paint Inspections1,050$0
0023BStabilization Plans525$0
0024BClearance Examinations375$0
0025BClearance Re-Examinations150$0
*Total Estimated FFP dollar value = Cumulative total of last column$0
**All Firm-Fixed Prices (FFP) must be rounded to the nearest dollar.

Proposal C "PHOC" Philadelphia (PHOC): Michigan, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Ohio, District of Columbia, Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia

CLINDescription of Supply or ServiceMax qtyFFP**Total= BEQ Units * FFP
Year 1
0001CVisual Assessments1,825$0
0002CLead-Based Paint Inspections1,825$0
0003CStabilization Plans925$0
0004CClearance Examinations925$0
0005CClearance Re-Examinations275$0
Year 2
0006CVisual Assessments2,275$0
0007CLead-Based Paint Inspections2,275$0
0008CStabilization Plans1,150$0
0009CClearance Examinations1,150$0
0010CClearance Re-Examinations325$0
Year 3
0011CVisual Assessments2,625$0
0012CLead-Based Paint Inspections2,625$0
0013CStabilization Plans1,325$0
0014CClearance Examinations1,325$0
0015CClearance Re-Examinations375$0
Year 4
0016CVisual Assessments3,075$0
0017CLead-Based Paint Inspections3,075$0
0018CStabilization Plans1,525$0
0019CClearance Examinations1,525$0
0020CClearance Re-Examinations450$0
Year 5
0021CVisual Assessments3,575$0
0022CLead-Based Paint Inspections3,575$0
0023CStabilization Plans1,800$0
0024CClearance Examinations1,800$0
0025CClearance Re-Examinations525$0
*Total Estimated FFP dollar value = Cumulative total of last column$0
**All Firm-Fixed Prices (FFP) must be rounded to the nearest dollar.

Proposal D "SAHOC" Santa Ana (SAHOC): Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and Northern Mariana Islands

CLINDescription of Supply or ServiceMax qtyFFP**Total= BEQ Units * FFP
Year 1
0001DVisual Assessments1,000$0
0002DLead-Based Paint Inspections1,000$0
0003DStabilization Plans500$0
0004DClearance Examinations400$0
0005DClearance Re-Examinations200$0
Year 2
0006DVisual Assessments1,100$0
0007DLead-Based Paint Inspections1,100$0
0008DStabilization Plans550$0
0009DClearance Examinations440$0
0010DClearance Re-Examinations220$0
Year 3
0011DVisual Assessments1,225$0
0012DLead-Based Paint Inspections1,225$0
0013DStabilization Plans625$0
0014DClearance Examinations500$0
0015DClearance Re-Examinations250$0
Year 4
0016DVisual Assessments1,350$0
0017DLead-Based Paint Inspections1,350$0
0018DStabilization Plans675$0
0019DClearance Examinations550$0
0020DClearance Re-Examinations275$0
Year 5
0021DVisual Assessments1,500$0
0022DLead-Based Paint Inspections1,500$0
0023DStabilization Plans750$0
0024DClearance Examinations600$0
0025DClearance Re-Examinations300$0
*Total Estimated FFP dollar value = Cumulative total of last column$0
**All Firm-Fixed Prices (FFP) must be rounded to the nearest dollar.

Supporting Narrative This worksheet will include all pricing pricing sources, facts, judgmental factors and assumptions to support an offeror's proposed pricing. For example, if the offeror proposes annual cost of living increases, the offeror must support the proposed increases with historical and relevant market index information. The pricing data and supporting information should be sufficient for an adequate evaluation and support the offeror’s Technical Capability. Submit benefits information not included in the Price Proposal written narrative IAW FAR 52.222-46 EVALAUTION OF COMENSATION FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES. A written Business Proposal requires pricing narrative, such as the place where offerors must submit Corporate Filings and FAR 52.219-14 "Limitations on Subcontracting".

Supporting Math Data If the offeror proposes annual cost of living increases, the offeror must support the proposed increases and show application of the mathematical formula in the TEP workbook. Offerors shall continue to provide a mathematical break down of their total price to reflect labor categories, labor rates, number of hours, materials and any other costs that make up the bottom-line price and necessary to permit an adequate evaluation of the proposed price in accordance with 15.403-3. The pricing data and supporting information should be sufficient for an adequate evaluation and support the offeror’s Technical Capability. Submit minimum wage/salary and benefit information.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .