NOI P20AC00827.pdf
PDF 332 KB Posted
- Attached to
- New River Clean Water Alliance
- Opportunity number
- NPS-20-REG1-0014
About this file
NOI P20AC00827
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| NOI Full Text.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE: NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD
This announcement is not a request for applications.
This announcement is to provide public notice of the National Park Service’s intention to award financial assistance for the following project activities. Refer to Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination.
ABSTRACT
Grants.gov Opportunity Number Project Title Recipient Anticipated Federal Funding Non-Federal Cost Share Total Anticipated Award Amount
Award Instrument
Anticipated Period of Performance
Legal Authority
CFDA # and Title
Single Source Justification Criteria
National Park Service Point of Contact
PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE
Section 1. Project Summary
Task Agreement Cooperative Agreement
Grant Agreement
Current as of 10/29/2018
STATEMENT OF WORK SUMMARY
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES
A. The recipient shall be responsible for the following items under this agreement:
B. The NPS Responsibilities:
A task agreement is proposed;
A cooperative agreement is proposed;
therefore substantial involvement by NPS is anticipated during the period of performance of this agreement. In support of this agreement NPS will:
A grant agreement is proposed, therefore no substantial involvement on the part of the NPS is anticipated for the successful completion of the statement of work. It is anticipated that involvement will be limited to actions related to monitoring project performance and technical assistance at the request of the recipient.
Section 3. Single Source Justification
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
SINGLE SOURCE POLICY REQUIREMENTS
National Park Service Policy FAP&P 1443-2015-06 requires a written justification which explains why competition is not practicable. The justification must address one of the following criteria.
In order for an assistance award to be made without competition, the award must satisfy one or more of the following criteria:
(1) Unsolicited Proposal – The proposed award is the result of an unsolicited assistance application which represents a unique or innovative idea, method, or approach which is not the subject of a current or planned contract or assistance award, but which is deemed advantageous to the program objectives. The unsolicited proposal must demonstrate an innovative capability or concept not currently available to the government, and prepared without Government involvement. ;
(2) Continuation – The activity to be funded is necessary to the satisfactory completion of, or is a continuation of, an activity presently being funded, for which competition would have a significant adverse effect on the continuity or completion of the activity;
(3) Legislative intent – The language in the applicable authorizing legislation or legislative history clearly indicates Congress’ intent to restrict the award to a particular recipient of purpose;
(4) Unique Qualifications – The applicant is uniquely qualified to perform the activity based upon a variety of demonstrable factors such as location, property ownership, voluntary support capacity, technical expertise, or other such unique qualifications. Successful past performance, familiarity with existing requirements, capabilities that can be obtained or matched by a competitor, or a positive reputation, are not considered to be unique qualifications.
(5) Emergencies – Program/award where there is insufficient time available (due to a compelling and unusual urgency, or substantial danger to health or safety) for adequate competitive procedures to be followed.
NPS did not solicit full and open competition for this award based the following criteria:
Task Agreement issued under previously competed or single source master cooperative agreement per Section 2 above. Single Source Justification not applicable.
Continuation
Unique Qualifications
Unsolicited Proposal
Legislative Intent
Explanation of the proposed recipient’s qualifications or the criteria of the proposed project which requires use of the single source criteria cited.
Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination
Emergency
The National Park Service intends to award a task agreement under a previously competed or single source justified award.
The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified cooperative agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.
The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified grant agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.
Section 4. Department of the Interior Secretary’s Priorities
This award will support the following DOI Secretary priority(ies):
Other Key Initiatives:
Employment of veterans.
Supporting DOI Infrastructure needs.
Creating jobs in the American economy.
Access to outdoor recreation opportunities.
Priority 1: Creating a conservation stewardship legacy second only to Teddy Roosevelt Utilize science to identify best practices to manage land and water resources and adapt to changes in the environment.
Examine land use planning process and land use designations that govern public use and access.
Revise and streamline the environmental and regulatory review process while maintaining environmental standards.
Review DOI water storage, transportation, and distribution systems to identify opportunities to resolve conflicts and expand capacity.
Foster relationships with conservation organizations advocating for balanced stewardship and use of public lands.
Identify and implement initiatives to expand access to DOI lands for hunting and fishing.
Shift the balance towards providing greater public access to public lands over restrictions to access.
Priority 2: Utilizing our natural resources Ensure American energy is available to meet our security and economic needs.
Ensure access to mineral resources, especially the critical and rare earth minerals.
Refocus timber programs to embrace the entire 'healthy forests' lifecycle.
Manage competition for grazing resources.
Priority 3: Restoring trust with local communities Be a better neighbor with those closest to our resources by improving dialogue and relationships with persons and entities bordering our lands.
Expand the lines of communication with Governors, state natural resource offices, Fish and Wildlife offices, water authorities, county commissioners, Tribes, and local communities.
Priority 4: Ensuring sovereignty means something Support tribal self-determination, self-governance, and sovereignty.
Solidify mutual interests between the U.S. and the freely associated states and territories.
Priority 5: Generating additional revenues to support DOI & National interests Ensure that the public receives the full market value for the natural resources produced on Federal lands.
Ensure that fees or costs levied for DOI services are reasonable and targeted to achieve cost recovery.
Consider the impact of DOI decisions on economic development and job creation.
Priority 6: Protecting our people and the border Actively support efforts to secure our southern border.
Ensure DOI law enforcement staffing addresses public safety risks anticipated on DOI land.
Promote a "public service" demeanor within our law enforcement community.
Priority 7: Striking a regulatory balance
Reduce the administrative and regulatory burden imposed on U.S.
industry and the public.
Ensure that Endangered Species Act decisions are based on strong science and thorough analysis.
Priority 8: Modernizing our infrastructure Support the White House Public/Private Partnership Initiative to modernize U.S. infrastructure.
Remove impediments to infrastructure development and facilitate private sector efforts to construct infrastructure projects serving American needs.
Prioritize DOI infrastructure needs to highlight:
1. Construction of infrastructure;
2. Cyclical maintenance;
3. Deferred maintenance.
Senior executives are expected to provide leadership in achieving goals of the President and the Secretary.
The Management Team is expected to:
1. Ensure cost-effective operations and quality service to the public;
2. Facilitate organizational cooperation and conflict resolution;
3. Ensure the workplace environment is conducive to employee productivity and safety;
4. Hold individuals accountable for actions that violate DOI policies and requirements.
Priority 10: Achieving our goals and leading our team forward
The proposed project does not support any of the DOI Secretary priorities, but the project is being funded for the following reasons:
Priority 9: Reorganizing for the next 100 years
Improve alignment and integration of the DOI organizational structure. Redistribute organizational resources (people and funding) to enhance mission achievement and improved public service.
Improve organizational alignment with Executive Branch counterparts with major land management assets or influence.
| PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES |
| STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE OF SUPPORT OR STIMULATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL AUTHORITY |
| PROJECT OVERVIEW |
| Grant: |
| gov number: NPS-20-REG1-0014 |
| Title: New River Clean Water Alliance |
| Funding: $39,993 |
| Cost share: $0 |
| Total funding: $39,993 |
| POP: Through December 31, 2023 |
| Authority: 54 USC §101702(a) |
| CFDA: 15.944 Natural Resources Stewardship |
| SS: Unique qualifications |
| POC: Patrick Reidy, Grants Management Specialist |
215-597-5949
| Goals: The primary goal of this project is to improve water quality of streams in New River Gorge National River to sustain the river’s environmental, cultural, recreational, and economic benefits. The recipient will coordinate the New River Clean Water Alliance, a group of local citizens and community leaders concerned about the health of the New River in West Virginia. The recipient will help the Alliance develop and implement a strategic plan focused on three primary objectives:1. Build community support: Strengthen the regional voice for clean water by building capacity and expertise for local organizations to educate and engage communities. Use citizen science initiatives to increase awareness and involve local citizens in meaningful ways.2. Examine and characterize current conditions: Monitor water quality and ecosystem health, identify sources of impairment, and develop reports and outreach materials that characterize current conditions and help to frame a discussion about potential solutions.3. Develop Solutions: Identify and support best management practices and projects that improve wastewater treatment systems, develop innovative wastewater treatment alternatives, incorporate green infrastructure, and protect watershed health and resilience. |
| PP: This project will benefit the public by improving water quality in the New River and its tributaries. By reducing sources of water quality impairment, the New River Clean Water Alliance will contribute to cleaner drinking water, healthier human communities, healthier aquatic ecosystems, safer recreational experiences, and a stronger regional economy. |
| Overview: The recipient will develop and coordinate the New River Clean Water Alliance to include: |
1. Invite local citizens, community leaders, and representatives from relevant agencies and organizations to participate in the New River Clean Water Alliance.
2. Establish a steering committee and relevant sub-committees.
3. Coordinate meetings for the steering committee and sub-committees.
4. Coordinate opportunities to share ideas, research, resources, and data among Alliance members.
5. Develop data management solutions for regional water quality monitoring data collected by partner agencies and organizations.
6. Coordinate development of a Strategic Plan and annual work plans.
7. Develop and effectively distribute outreach materials.
8. Host and maintain the Alliance website and develop relevant web content.
9. Coordinate citizen science initiatives related to water quality monitoring, trash clean-up, and green infrastructure.
10. Coordinate preparation of Lower New River State of the Watershed reports.
| Recipient: New River Conservancy |
| Sub Involv: 1. Monitor and provide Federal oversight of activities performed under this Agreement. Monitoring and oversight includes review and approval of financial status and performance reports, payment requests, and tasks identified below. Additional monitoring activities may include site visits, conference calls, and other on-site and off-site monitoring activities. At the Recipient’s request, NPS may also provide technical assistance to the Recipient in support of the objectives of this Agreement. |
2. Assist with developing the Alliance's strategic plan.
3. Assist with selecting projects and developing the Alliance's annual work plans.
4. Participate as a steering committee member.
5. Provide technical assistance, safety training, and orientation to park resources for projects within the park.
6. Provide access to water quality monitoring equipment.
7. Share park data on water quality and aquatic ecosystem health.
Justification: The New River Conservancy (NRC) is uniquely qualified to achieve these project goals and objectives because of their experience, capacity, and technical expertise running similar programs within the New River watershed, upstream of New River Gorge National River. NRC is a leader in studying, monitoring, and improving the condition of the New River watershed. For forty years, the organization has focused its programs on (1) sharing and fostering research, (2) educating and engaging communities, and (3) protecting and restoring the New River and its tributaries. NRC’s current programs are centered primarily on the New River in Virginia and North Carolina; however, these programs are scalable and transferable to the New River in West Virginia. For example:
(1) Sharing and fostering research: NRC hosts the New River Consortium, which brings together university students / faculty, agency representatives, and other partners to collect, analyze, and report on scientific data related to river ecosystem attributes, processes, and stressors. The resulting research is used to help agencies develop science-based policies and to help watershed associations and other partners take direct actions to improve watershed conditions. NRC maintains an online library of published scientific reports and hosts a biennial conference to share research results and project accomplishments. Through the Consortium, NRC is uniquely qualified to connect the New River Alliance with researchers and agency representatives, promote new research opportunities, and provide a unique platform for sharing program results.
(2) Educating and engaging communities: Through their New River Water Watchers program, NRC trains volunteer citizen scientists to collect water quality data using a protocol and quality assurance plan that meet standards of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Data are publicly available through their web-based database. NRC’s experience with citizen science programs, state agency collaboration, volunteer coordination, data management, and website management would be directly transferable to the Alliance’s priority objectives in West Virginia and provide an opportunity to create watershed-scale programs that are consistent across North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia.
(3) Protecting and restoring streams: NRC has experience leading projects to plant trees and shrubs in riparian buffers to reduce erosion and improve water quality. They also host volunteer events to clean up trash from streams and riparian areas. NRC has also improved water quality by educating and assisting landowners about green infrastructure, such as building rain gardens that filter stormwater runoff. NRC’s experience would help the Alliance develop similar programs for the New River and its tributaries in West Virginia.
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box23: Off |
| Check Box24: Off |
| Check Box25: Off |
| Check Box26: Yes |
| Check Box27: Off |
| Check Box29: Off |
| Check Box30: Off |
| Check Box31: Yes |
| Check Box32: Off |
| Check Box33: Off |
| Check Box34: Off |
| Check Box35: Off |
| Check Box36: Off |
| Check Box39: Off |
| Check Box40: Yes |
| Check Box41: Off |
| Check Box44: Off |
| Check Box45: Off |
| Check Box46: Off |
| Check Box47: Off |
| Check Box48: Off |
| Check Box49: Off |
| Check Box50: Off |
| Check Box51: Off |
| Check Box52: Off |
| Check Box53: Off |
| Check Box54: Off |
| Check Box55: Off |
| Check Box56: Off |
| Check: Choice 2 |
| CheckA: Choice 4 |
| NA: |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Responsibilities: 1. The Recipient shall carry out the Statement of Work in accordance with the terms and conditions stated herein. The Recipient shall adhere to Federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and codes, as applicable. |
2. Provide or hire a Coordinator who will devote no fewer than 20 hours/week to carrying out the Statement of Work.
3. Provide or hire other staff and or sub-contractors as needed to manage data, develop / host a website, and prepare State of the Watershed reports.
4. Provide suitable office space or ensure adequacy of remote / alternative work site for the Coordinator.
5. Provide all computer hardware / software, other office equipment, and supplies necessary to carry out the Statement of Work.
6. Provide or arrange suitable space for general membership meetings, steering committee meetings, and sub-committee meetings.
File details come from the government source that posted it.