SATPC0041008 Tab 10 Vendor Question_Customer Response.pdf
PDF 63 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Orcalloy 14 Metal Powder
- Solicitation number
- 80NSSC26931844Q
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for federal contract solicitation 80NSSC26931844Q regarding Orcalloy 14 metal powder.
The document addresses vendor inquiries about material specifications and acceptable alternatives. Vendor 1 asked whether Orcalloy-14b is a proprietary material and, if so, whether the customer could provide a list of qualified distributors or producers. The customer confirmed that the composition is proprietary and declined to provide a list of qualified distributors. In a follow-up question, Vendor 1 sought clarification on whether bids proposing alternate alloy designations would be acceptable if they meet the specified chemistry and particle size distribution requirements, even if not under the Orcalloy-14b brand name. The customer confirmed that such bids would be considered, provided the technical requirements are met.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SATPC0041008 Tab 04 4 SOW.pdf | ||
| SATPC0041008 Tab 10 RFQ Open Market.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Vendor Questions and Vendor response
Orcalloy 14 metal powder - 80NSSC26931844Q
Vendor 1 - Question 1:
Is Orcalloy-14b a proprietary material or can alternate alloy designations be proposed if chemistry and particle size distribution requirements are met? If proprietary, would you be able to provide the producer or a list of qualified distributors?
Customer Response:
The composition is proprietary and no I cannot provide a list of qualified distributors.
Vendor 1 - Question 2:
While it is proprietary if chemistry and particle size distribution requirements are met even though it’s not under the brand Orcalloy-14b, will the bid still be considered?
Customer Response: Sure
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .