Attachment 1_TRL Overview.pdf
PDF 374 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 80MSFC24SS_CACHE
About this file
This document is a Sources Sought Notification for the Cryogenic Active Cooling for Human Exploration (CACHE) contract opportunity from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Marshall Space Flight Center.
The notification seeks information from potential sources to develop and demonstrate high capacity cryocooler technologies to Technology Readiness Level (TRL)-6 for Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) storage and scalable for Liquid Oxygen (LOX) and Liquid Methane (LCH4) for future long duration NASA missions. Key performance parameters include the ability to remove 15-25 watts at 20K for LH2, be reliable for 5 years, and have high power and weight efficiency. NASA is considering a future acquisition under the NextSTEP 3 Broad Agency Announcement, potentially with multiple firm-fixed-price contracts for concept development with options for follow-on work. Responses are due by October 6, 2024. NASA is also seeking input on barriers and opportunities to engage subject matter experts and small/underserved businesses to support equity and inclusion goals.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TRL DESCRIPTION AT A GLANCE
System/ Subsystem prototype demonstration in a relevant environment.
Basic Technology Research
Technology concept and/or application formulated
Analytical and experimental proof-of-concept of critical function and/or characteristics
Component and/or breadboard validation in a laboratory environment.
Component and/or brassboard validated in a relevant environment.
Research to Prove Feasibility
Basic principles observed & reported
Technology Development
Technology Demonstration
System / Subsystem Development
System Test Launch and Operations
System prototype demonstration in an operational environment.
Actual system completed and
"flight qualified" through test and demonstration in intended operational environment.
Actual system flight proven through successful mission operations.
Component Low Fidelity
Component Med Fidelity
System High Fidelity
System Ops High Fidelity
SysTest Demo Final Config
Flight Ops Final Config
Flight Qual Flt Operational Environment
Operational Environment
* gravity dependence?
Relevant Environment Laboratory
Environment
What mission is it being scaled to?
Scalability All critical scaling issues are addressed.
Unit that functions in the actual operational environment and platform.
Operational fluid/propellant.
Demonstration of basic functionality.
Unit with realistic elements, demonstrated overall performance in critical areas.
System that demonstrates performance under critical Environmental conditions
Final config. is successfully demonstrated for its intended operational environ. and platform.
*Life Test Complete
The final product is successfully operated in an actual mission.
* If unit/system is gravity dependent, it can not reach higher TRL until testing in low-g environment.
TRL1 TRL2 TRL3
TRL4 TRL5
TRL6 TRL7
TRL8 TRL9
Flight Tech Demo
Flight Operational
Mission
Life Limiting Requirements
Characterize, by means of test, the physics of the life-limiting mechanisms and failure modes or develop and validate an analytical model / simulation that predicts life limiting mechanisms and failure modes.
Identify life-limiting mechanisms and failure modes.
Verify by test or analysis that the technology is resilient to the effects of life-limiting mechanisms.
Complete life tests..
Peer-reviewed documentation of the research underlying the proposed concept
Documented concept & application that addresses feasibility and benefit
Documented analytical & experimental results validating predictions of key parameters
Resources:
• NPR 7123
• TRL Best Practices Guide
• Ref: NASA Systems Handbook
OVERVIEW OF TRL ASSESSMENTS – WHERE TO START
Mission
•Identification of mission (s)
•Current mission and future mission (s) – this helps with scalability assessment.
Interfaces
•Clear definition of what hardware is included in
TRL
assessment.
Delineate hardware that is not included.
Fidelity
•Low-Med-High Hardware and Analysis Fidelity
•Could be basic form-fit-function to detailed operations or spreadsheet calcs to detailed models
Life
•Identification of failure mechanisms and modes to performance of life testing.
Scalability
•Identification of scalability to larger/smaller missions
•Identify gaps for scalability
Environments
•Identification of environments associated with the mission.
Transportation, launch loads, in-space transit, landing loads and system operations.
•Identify if technology is gravity dependent – does it work different on ground than in mirco-g
Development History
•What is the history of the development.
What was done prior.
Performance
•Was the performance criteria met? If not, what changes need to be made for the future development activities?
TRL+1
What are the next TRL gaps? What is required thru testing, analysis or documentati on to meet the next TRL.
| Slide 1 |
| Slide 2 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .