Q&A-80LARC704330Q.pdf
PDF 76 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Technical Problem Analysis Including Emerging Markets and Transformative NASA Research Opportunities Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80LARC704330Q
About this file
Response to questions received.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 80LARC704330Q_Q&A.docx | DOCX document | |
| Q&A-80LARC704330Q.pdf | ||
| RFQ_Instructions.pdf | ||
| UAM_WTO_SOWFinal.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ 80LARC704330Q
Responses to Questions
1. Ref: RFQ instructions, page 5, 52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO
IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR EXECUTIVE ORDERS - COMMERCIAL ITEMS.
Question: “52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan” is incorporated by reference but a Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not requested in the RFQ language. Please confirm that a Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not requested.
Response: The Small Business Plan is not a part of the evaluation criteria so it does not need to be submitted with the RFQ. If an Other Than Small Business is awarded and depending if there are subcontracting opportunities, (this is only a 12 week effort) then we will request a subcontracting plan to be provided after award.
2. Ref: RFQ instructions, page 1, Evaluation, Proposal Format. “The technical and past performance parts shall not exceed 25 pages.”
Question: In order for offerors to provide sufficient context on relevant past experience, would NASA allow a maximum of 25 pages for the technical part and 5 pages for the past performance part?
Response: Based on the evaluation criteria requested to be submitted the Government is confident that 25 pages is sufficient for evaluation of both technical and past performance.
File details come from the government source that posted it.