80GRC023R0023 GLAM Request for Information - Potential Organizational Conflicts of Interest.pdf
PDF 149 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Request for Information for Potential OCIs - Glenn Logistics And Metrology (GLAM) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DRAFT - GLAM Performance Work Statement_redacted.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Information (RFI) for Potential Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) Glenn Logistics and Metrology (GLAM)
80GRC023R0023
NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) is requesting information from industry regarding potential organizational conflicts of interest (OCI) arising from the Glenn Logistics and Metrology (GLAM) contract.
The nature of the work anticipated under the GLAM contract may create the potential for OCI(s) as currently described in FAR Subpart 9.5. Each interested party should review FAR Subpart 9.5 in light of NASA’s anticipation of OCI issues and consider carefully the extent to which an OCI may arise before making the decision to compete for the GLAM contract.
Specifically, NASA anticipates that the effort under the GLAM contract will include the below potential OCI issue.
• By performance of the contract, individual contracting personnel may gain access to information which, if used for nongovernmental purposes by the contractor or other entity, could create an unfair competitive advantage in seeking future contracts.
You are requested to provide electronic responses via e-mail to the Contracting Officer listed at the end of this synopsis. Your response is requested by 3:00pm eastern time on May 12, 2023. Interested parties are requested to address the following questions:
1. What type(s) of OCI issues would your company or potential team identify, if any, should you choose to propose on the GLAM contract?
2. What strategies would you anticipate proposing to mitigate the OCI issues that you identified (if any)? Please provide strategy details, previous examples/experience with other contracts with NASA or other agencies, etc.
3. Are there any other types of potential OCI issues with the proposed GLAM contract that were not identified in this RFI (assuming any were identified)?
4. Does your company foresee any OCI issues associated with the GLAM contract that would cause you to decide not to propose on the potential GLAM RFP?
NASA will review any responses received regarding potential OCI and each offeror’s proposed OCI mitigation strategy. NASA will respond to each company who submits a mitigation strategy. NASA’s response is not intended to serve as a confirmation that, in fact, all potential OCI have been identified, an OCI will ultimately exist, or that an interested party is capable of successfully eliminating or mitigating an identified OCI. NASA’s response is also not intended to encourage or discourage any interested party from responding to an RFP issued for logistics and/or metrology in the future. Furthermore, NASA’s response in no way alters or interprets FAR 9.5 as it applies to a final performance work statement or a final proposal submission, should an interested party elect to submit a proposal to an RFP for GLAM.
Subsequent to the initial OCI submission and NASA’s response, NASA will not consider further information as it relates to this RFI.
The documents posted so far on SAM.gov are for information and planning purposes, to allow industry the opportunity to comment, and to promote competition only. NASA will not affirmatively release any information received in response to this RFI to the public but may use information received in developing the best approach for a contract strategy, and therefore such information may be recognizable to the interested party who submitted it. Any information submitted in response to this RFI that is marked as “Confidential Commercial or Financial Information” will be considered as voluntarily submitted in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act.
All questions should be directed to the point of contact identified below. In accordance with FAR 15.201(e), responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by NASA to form a binding contract. NASA is under no obligation to issue a solicitation or to award any contract on the basis of this RFI. NASA will not pay for any information solicited under this RFI. No solicitation exists; therefore, do not request a copy of a solicitation. If a solicitation is released it will be synopsized on SAM.gov. It is the interested party’s responsibility to monitor this website for the release of any subsequent solicitation or synopsis.
Point of Contact Name: Rita K. Dickens Title: Contracting Officer Email: rita.k.dickens@nasa.gov
NASA intends to publicize a listing of respondents’ organization names in order to facilitate teaming arrangements. If your organization would like to point out a specific point of contact to be listed, please point this out in your response. Should your firm desire not to be included in this listing, clearly indicate this desire in your response.
Attachment Attachment 1 - DRAFT GLAM Performance Work Statement
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .