SSJ Beta.Sam.pdf

PDF 302 KB Posted

Attached to
Carithers Wallace and Courtenay Sit Stand Base
Solicitation number
75D301-20-Q-71265
Issued by

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

JUSTIFICATION FOR SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT (OPEN MARKET OR GSA)

UNDER $250,000

Sole source acquisitions may be used on a limited basis and only when the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)/Program Official has provided sufficient justification and the Contracting Officer has determined that the circumstances warrant such action. The content for a justification must contain detailed facts and rationale to justify the sole source acquisition. Soliciting from a single source must be done in accordance with FAR 13.106-1(b) or 8.405-6. At a minimum, the following information must be included:

Identification of Program Office, Contracting Activity, and Proposed Requirement, Justification and Program Office Certification:

A. Program Office:

National Center for Injury Prevention 4770 Buford Hwy

Chamblee, Building 106 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA 30341

B. Contracting Activity:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office of Financial Resources Acquisition Branch Branch 4

C. Identification of Requirement:

1. Nature of Action to be Approved by Contracting Officer:

a. Sole source acquisition of: purchasing of 227 sit stand bases and dual monitor arms for 8th, 9th, and 10th floor of B106 from CWC, using Packaged Office GSA contract.

b. Procurement Request (PR) Number (if available): Click here to enter text.

2. Proposed Vendor and Estimated Procurement Amount (if available):

a. Proposed Vendor: Carithers Wallace and Courtenay 4343 NE Expressway

Atlanta, GA 30340

b. Estimated Procurement Amount:

3. Is the requirement on GSA Schedule? ☒ Yes ☐ No

If yes, provide schedule number: GSA 47QSCA19D000C

Rev. 5/14/19

D. Justification:

1. The justification for this non-competitive action is:

☐ In accordance with FAR 13.106-1(b)(1), “only one source [is] reasonably available” which states that, “For purchases not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. (i) Contracting officers may solicit from one source if the contracting officer determines that the circumstances of the contract action deem only one source reasonably available (e.g., urgency, exclusive licensing agreements, brand-name or industrial mobilization). (ii) Where a single source is identified to provide a portion of a purchase because that portion of the purchase specifies a particular brand-name item, the documentation in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section only applies to the portion of the purchase requiring brand-name item. The documentation should state it is covering only the portion of the acquisition which is brand- name.”

☐ Urgency

☐ Exclusive licensing agreements/Proprietary data

☐ Brand name required

☐ Industrial mobilization

☐ Other (e.g., compatibility, space issues, continuity, compatibility, etc.)

☒ In accordance with FAR 8.405-6 “Limiting Sources” which states that, “the only circumstances that may justify the action are – (A) An urgent and compelling need exists, and following the procedures would result in unacceptable delays; (B) Only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized; or (C) In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-up to an original Federal Supply Schedule order provided that the original order was placed in accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering procedures. The original BPA must not have been previously issued under sole-source or limited-sources procedures.”

☐ Urgency

☒ Only One Source

☐ Logical Follow Up

☒ Brand name required

2. Other facts supporting sole source procurement:

a. What can this product/service do that other products/services cannot do?

This order is under CWC's packaged office GSA contract. The order includes predominantly Herman Miller furniture ($144,076.04) and CWC is the dealer of record for CDC for Herman Miller. The order also includes ESI ($54,849.08) products which are included in CWC's packaged office GSA contract. These types of products are required to meet the existing building design standards. Since CWC is the dealer of record for CDC for Herman Miller, CWC is the sole source for this requirement. Separate orders for each type of product is not practicable.

b. What other products/services were considered and why did they not meet the need?

In order to maintain design standards, Herman Miller furniture is required.

Rev. 5/14/19

3. Program Office efforts to seek potential offerors:

In order to maintain design standards, Herman Miller furniture is required.

Herman Miller was contacted to identify possible sources to get the furniture.

According to Herman Miller, CDW is the Herman Miller authorized deaer for the Atlanta, GA region.

E. Program Office Certification:

I have reviewed this sole source justification and certify the justification is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and adequate to support other than full and open competition.

Center/Institute/Office COR/Program Official Name/Title: Click here to enter text.

Center/Institute/Office COR/Program Official Signature:

Certification Date: Click here to enter a date.

F. Contracting Office Certification:

I have fully relied on the information provided herein and hereby certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief:

Contracting Officer Name: Click here to enter text.

Contracting Officer Signature:

Certification Date: Click here to enter a date.

2019-12-23T12:55:54-0500
Howard D. Bish -S

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .