Attachment_3_Past_Performance_Reference_Form-USAID_Indonesia.doc
DOC document 125 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USAID/Indonesia Tuberculosis Private Sector (TBPS) activity Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 72049718R00012
About this file
Attchment 3 - Past Performance Information Reference
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| AMENDMENT_01_-__RFP_-_72049718R00012_TBPS.pdf | ||
| Edit_with_Track_Changes_RFP_-_72049718R00012_TBPS.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_Contractor's_Past_Performance_Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| 72049718R00012_USAID_Indonesia_TBPS.pdf | ||
| 72049718R00012_-_Synopsis_for_TBPS_Solicitation.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE FORM
Subject:
Reference for [fill in offeror’s name] ________________
RE:
USAID/Indonesia Tuberculosis Private Sector – RFP No. 72049718R00012 Due Date:
June 26, 2018 at 14:00 Jakarta Time
Dear Referee, Your name has been provided by [fill in offeror’s name]___________________________as a past performance reference for their work that they have done for your organization, specifically as to the following activity/project:
[Offeror to provide Activity/Project Name and/or Contract/Agreement Reference No.]
We are seeking relevant past performance information for a USAID solicitation focused on Tuberculosis Private Sector Activity. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a Federal contract.
Please provide some brief feedback and select one of the ratings of the sub-criteria below. A table of the definitions for each of the ratings is included in the table below.
Please respond by June 26, 2018 at 14:00 Jakarta time, by sending this feedback directly to USAID Indonesia at proposals-indo@usaid.gov . Please label the Subject Line of the email as “[Name of Offeror – SOL-72049718R00012 - USAID TB PS - Past Performance Reference Form”.
If you have any additional questions or comments please feel free to email the Point of Contact: Albert Carrera, Contracting Officer via email at proposals-indo@usaid.gov .
Thanks for your time in responding. Your feedback is greatly appreciated in assisting the Technical Evaluation Committee (TEC) in its evaluation process.
Assessment Narrative
Please write no more than a paragraph on each of the assessment areas, which require concise writing on substantive issues related to contractor performance. (Imagine what you would like to know about this contractor if you were making a decision about whether to award a future contract.)
Assessment Rating
Based on the narrative, please rate the performance using the evaluation rating definition below. The rating should conform to the narrative.
| Adjective |
| Past Performance Definition |
| Exceptional |
| The offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant award met award requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. The company performed with very few or minor problems, for which corrective actions taken were, or are, expected to be highly effective. Performance of completed awards was either consistently of the highest quality or exhibited a trend of becoming so. The offeror’s past performance record leads to an extremely strong expectation of successful performance. |
| Very Good |
| The offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant awards met award requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. The company performed with some minor problems, for which corrective actions taken were or are expected to be effective. Performance of completed awards was either consistently of high quality or exhibited a trend towards becoming so. The offeror’s past performance record leads to a strong expectation of successful performance. |
| Satisfactory |
| The offeror’s past performance of previously awarded relevant awards met award requirements. The company performed with some problems, for which corrective actions taken by the awardee were, or are expected to be, effective. Performance of completed awards was consistently of adequate or better quality or exhibited a trend toward becoming so. The offerors past performance record leads to an expectation of successful performance. |
| Marginal |
| The offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant awards did not meet some award requirements. The awardee’s performance reflected some serious problems for which the awardee either failed to identify or implement corrective actions in a timely manner, or for which the correctible actions implemented were, or are expected to be, only partially effective. Performance of completed awards was consistently of mediocre quality or exhibited a trend toward becoming so. The offeror’s past performance record leads to an expectation that successful performance might be difficult to achieve or that it can occur only with increased levels of government management and oversight. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant awards did not meet most award requirements and recovery, if any, did not occur within the stated period of performance. The awardee’s performance reflected serious problems for which the offeror either failed to identify or implement corrective actions were mostly ineffective. Performance of completed awards was consistently of poor quality or a trend toward becoming so. The offeror’s past performance record leads to a strong expectation that successful performance would not be achieved or that it can occur only with greatly increased levels of government management and oversight. |
| Neutral |
| The offeror lacks a record of relevant or available past performance history. Based on this, there is no expectation of either successful or unsuccessful performance. |
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Quality What is your assessment of the Contractor’s to provide quality products or services, including consistency in meeting goals and targets and cooperation and effectiveness of the Prime in fixing problems?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Quality
Narrative.
Question 2. Cost Control
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to control cost, including forecasting costs as well as accuracy in financial reporting? (not applicable for Assistance, Firm-Fixed Price or Firm-Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment contracts).
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Cost Control
Question 3. Schedule/Timeliness of performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability meet the schedule, including the timeliness against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Schedule
Question 4. Management
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to maintain professional behavior and overall business-like concern for the interests of the customer, including satisfactory business relationship to clients, initiation and management of several complex activities simultaneously, coordination among subawards and developing country partners, prompt and satisfactory correction of problems, and cooperative attitude in fixing problems?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Management
Question 5. Regulatory Compliance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to perform in accordance with award terms and conditions relating to applicable regulations and codes (financial, environmental, safety, and other reporting requirements)?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Regulatory Compliance
Question 6. Utilization of Small Business Concern (For Prime who are not small business)
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to utilize small business concerns as subcontractors, and achievement on each individual small business goal stated within the award/or subawarding plan, including good faith effort if the goal was not achieved?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Utilization of Small Business
Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Agency/Organization: _______________________________________________________
Title: __________________________________ Phone: ______________________________
E-mail: ______________________________________________________________________
PAGE
File details come from the government source that posted it.