AMENDMENT_1__RFP.pdf

Request for Proposals (RFP) No.: SOL-72012119R00001 Issue Date: April 9, 2019 Questions Due: April 22, 2019, 9:00 am Kyiv local time Closing Date: May 30, 2019, 4:00 pm Kyiv local time

Subject: Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 72012119R00001 USAID Ukraine Monitoring and Learning

Support Contract

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is seeking proposals from US small business concerns to implement the USAID Ukraine Monitoring and Learning Support Contract as described in the attached Request for Proposals (RFP). USAID/Ukraine anticipates awarding one cost plus fixed fee (CPFF) type contract with a period of performance of five (5) years. The total estimated cost of this contract (including costs and fee) is in the range of $16 - $18 million. The principal geographic code for this contract is 110 and 937. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 541990. All qualified U.S. small business offerors are invited to submit a proposal. USAID/Ukraine sets aside this procurement for U.S. Small Business entities.

Please refer to Section L for information regarding proposal requirements. Offerors should take into account the expected delivery time required by the email transmission method, and they are responsible to ensure that proposals are received at USAID by the closing date and time as specified above. Failure to comply with the submission date and time will deem any submission unacceptable and it will not be reviewed or evaluated. Proposals must be signed by an official who is authorized to bind the organization and are to be submitted to USAID no later than the closing date and time stated above.

Offerors should pay particular attention to the organizational conflict of interest clauses in Section H of the RFP and note that the successful offeror may be precluded from other USAID/Ukraine procurements.

Any questions regarding this solicitation must be submitted in writing via email to Maria Televantos mtelevantos@usaid.gov with a copy to Olga Luchuk-Vysotska at oluchukvysotska@usaid.gov by the date and time specified above. Answers to questions received in writing will be made available to all offerors through an amendment to the RFP and posted on www.fbo.gov.

Only electronic proposals will be accepted. Proposals must be sent to mtelevantos@usaid.gov and oluchukvysotska@usaid.gov

This RFP in no way obligates USAID to award a contract nor does it commit USAID to pay any cost incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal. Award of a Contract under this RFP is subject to availability of funds and other internal USAID approvals.

This RFP can be viewed and downloaded from www.fedbizopps.gov. USAID bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes. Further, be aware that amendments to solicitations are occasionally issued and will be posted on the same website from which you downloaded the solicitation. USAID advises to regularly check the above website for amendments.

Thank you for your interest in working with USAID.

Sincerely, ______/s/_______ Maria Televantos Contracting Officer mailto:mtelevantos@usaid.gov mailto:oluchukvysotska@usaid.gov mailto:mtelevantos@usaid.gov mailto:oluchukvysotska@usaid.gov http://www.fedbizopps.gov/

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER RATING PAGE OF PAGES

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. SOLICITATION NUMBER 4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION 5. DATE ISSUED 6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NUMBER

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If other than Item 7)

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "Offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

9. Sealed offers in original and _____________________________ copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if hand carried, in the depository located in until local time _______________________ (Hour) (Date)

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All Offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.

A. NAME B. TELEPHONE (NO COLLECT CALLS) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AREA CODE NUMBER EXT.

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S) (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES

A SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM I CONTRACT CLAUSES

B SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACH.

C DESCRIPTION/SPECS./WORK STATEMENT J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

D PACKAGING AND MARKING PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

E INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

F DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

G CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA L INSTR., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

H SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS M EVALUATION FACOTRRS FOR AWARD

K REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER

STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within _180_ calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period is inserted by the Offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT 10 CALENDAR DAYS (%) 20 CALENDAR DAYS (%) 30 CALENDAR DAYS (%) CALENDAR DAYS (%) (See Section I, Clause No. 52-232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS AMENDMENT NO. DATE AMENDMENT NO. DATE

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated:

CODE FACILITY 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER 15A. NAME AND

ADDRESS OF

OFFEROR

(Type or print)

15B. TELEPHONE NUMBER 17. SIGNATURE 18. OFFER DATE

AREA CODE NUMBER EXT. 15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS IS DIFFERENT FROM

ABOVE - ENTER SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION: 23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

10 U.S.C. 2304(a) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE CODE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Maria Televantos

27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

(REV. 9-97)

10. FOR INFORMATION CALL:

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

STANDARD FORM 33

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD N/A

SOLICITATION

OFFER (Must be fully completed by Offeror)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

SOL-72012119R00001

X

04/9/2019 REQ-121-19-000020

USAID/Ukraine/Regional Contract Office Department of State 5850 Kyiv Pl.

Washington D.C. 20521-5850

16:00 (Kyiv LT) 05/30/2019

Olga Luchuk-Vysotska

380445215431 oluchukvysotska@usaid.gov See Attached Table of Contents

X 1

X 7

X 10

X 19

X 21

X 22

X 34

X 38

X 60

X 96

X 97

X 112

X 126

USAID/Ukraine/Regional Contract Office

USAID/Ukraine/Office of Financial Management

4 Igor Sikorsky Street, Kyiv 04112, Ukraine; Phone: +380 (44) 521 5000; Fax: 521-5245; http://ukraine.usaid.gov

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – THE SCHEDULE

SECTION B – SERVICES AND PRICE/COSTS

B.1 PURPOSE

B.2 CONTRACT TYPE AND CONTRACT SERVICES

B.3 ESTIMATED COST, FIXED FEE, AND OBLIGATED AMOUNT

B.4 CONTRACT BUDGET AND CEILINGS

B.5 INDIRECT COST

B.6 COST REIMBURSABLE

B.7 PAYMENT OF FIXED FEE

B.8 MULTI-YEAR CONTRACT AND CANCELLATION CEILING

SECTION C – DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/STATEMENT OF WORK

C.1 TITLE OF ACTIVITY

C.2 PURPOSE

C.3 BACKGROUND

C.4 OBJECTIVE 1: USAID/UKRAINE CDCS IMPLEMENTATION

C.5 OBJECTIVE 2: HOLISTIC SUPPORT FOR ONGOINGMISSION MONITORING

AND LEARNING NEEDS

C.6 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

SECTION D – BRANDING AND MARKING

D.1 AIDAR 752.7009 MARKING (JAN 1993)

D.2 BRANDING STRATEGY (BS)

D.3 BRANDING AND MARKING POLICY AND CREATION AND DEVELOPMENT

OF WEBSITE

D.4 BRANDING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (BIP) AND MARKING PLAN (MP) 20

SECTION E – INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

E.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

E.2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

SECTION F – DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

F.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

F.2 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

F.3 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE

F.4 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

F.5 AUTHORIZED WORK WEEK

F.6 DELIVERABLES

F.7 KEY PERSONNEL

F.8 AIDAR 752.7005 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT

EXPERIENCE DOCUMENTS (September 2013)

F.9 GEOSPATIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

SECTION G – CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

G.1 CONTRACTING OFFICER’S AUTHORITY

G.2 AIDAR 752.7003 DOCUMENTATION FOR PAYMENT (NOV 1998)

G.3 CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE (COR)

G.4 PAYING OFFICE

Ukraine Monitoring and Learning Support Contract

G.5 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING OFFICE

G.6 INVOICING INSTRUCTIONS

G.7 TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS/RELATIONSHIP WITH USAID

G.8 CONTRACTOR’S PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT

G.9 ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

SECTION H – SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

H.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

H.2 AIDAR 752.225-70 SOURCE AND NATIONALITY REQUIREMENTS (FEB 2012)

H.3 ADS 302.3.5.19 USAID-FINANCED THIRD-PARTY WEB SITES (NOV 2017) ... 39

H.4 ADS 302.3.5.22 SUBMISSION OF DATASETS TO THE DEVELOPMENT DATA

LIBRARY (DDL) (OCT 2014)

H.5 AIDAR 752.7004 EMERGENCY LOCATOR INFORMATION (JUL 1997)

H.6 AIDAR 752.7007 PERSONNEL COMPENSATION (JULY 2007)

H.7 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PERSONNEL COMPENSATION

H.8 AIDAR 752.228-70 MEDICAL EVACUATION (MEDEVAC) SERVICES (JUL 2007)

H.9 AIDAR 752.222-70 USAID DISABILITY POLICY (DEC 2004)

H.10 AUTHORIZED GEOGRAPHIC CODE

H.11 EXECUTIVE ORDERS ON TERRORISM FINANCING

H.12 COMMUNICATIONS AND OUTREACH APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS

H.13 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED FACILITIES OR PROPERTY

H.14 FOREIGN GOVERNMENT DELEGATIONS TO INTERNATIONAL

CONFERENCES

H.15 LOGISTICAL SUPPORT

H.16 LANGUAGE REQUIREMENTS

H.17 AIDAR 752.7032 INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL APPROVAL AND NOTIFICATION

REQUIREMENTS (APR 2014)

H.18 FRAUD REPORTING

H.19 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

H.20 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION

H.21 FACILITIES USED FOR RELIGIOUS ACTIVITIES

H.22 INSURANCE AND SERVICES

H.23 CONSENT TO SUBCONTRACT

H.24 CLOUD COMPUTING (APRIL 2018)

H.25 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: PRECLUSION FROM

IMPLEMENTATION CONTRACT (SEPTEMBER 2018)

H.26 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: PRECLUSION FROM

FURNISHING CERTAIN SERVICES AND RESTRICTION ON USE OF

INFORMATION (SEPTEMBER 2018)

H.27 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

H.28 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SYSTEM

H.29 AIDAR 752.204-72 ACCESS TO USAID FACILITIES AND USAID'S INFORMATION

SYSTEMS (MAY 2018) (DEVIATION NO. M/OAA-DEV-AIDAR-16-2c) H. 30 ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCESSIBILITY (April 2018) 58

H.31 LIMITATION ON ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

(DEVIATION NOs. M/OAA-DEV-FAR-18-2c and M/OAA-DEV-AIDAR-18-2c) (APRIL 2018) 58

PART II – CONTRACT CLAUSES

SECTION I – CONTRACT CLAUSES

I.1 52.252-2 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

I.2 AIDAR 752.252-1 AIDAR SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE (MAR 2015)

I.3 FAR 52.204-1 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT (DEC 1989)

I.4 FAR 52.229-8 TAXES – FOREIGN COST-REIMBURSEMENT CONTRACTS (MAR

1990) 63

I.5 AIDAR 752.7025 APPROVALS (APR 1984)

I.6 AIDAR 752.7101 VOLUNTARY POPULATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES (JUNE

2008) 64

I.7 AIDAR 752.229-71 REPORTING OF FOREIGN TAXES (JULY 2007)

I.8 AIDAR 752.222-71 NONDISCRIMINATION (JUNE 2012)

I.9 AIDAR 752.231-72 CONFERENCE PLANNING AND REQUIRED APPROVALS

(AUG 2013)

I.10 AIDAR 752.7036 USAID IMPLEMENTING PARTNER NOTICES (IPN) PORTAL

FOR ACQUISITION (JUL 2014)

I.11 52.203-13 CONTRACTOR CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS AND CONDUCT (OCT

2015) 67

I.12 52.203-19 – PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING CERTAIN INTERNAL

CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS OR STATEMENTS (JAN 2017)

I.13 52.217-2 CANCELLATION UNDER MULTI-YEAR CONTRACTS. (OCT 1997) 71

I.14 52.222-50 – COMBATING TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS (JAN 2019)

I.15 AIDAR 752.245-70 GOVERNMENT PROPERTY—USAID REPORTING

REQUIREMENTS (OCT 2017)

I.16 FAR 52.204-23 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR HARDWARE,

SOFTWARE, AND SERVICES DEVELOPED OR PROVIDED BY KASPERSKY LAB AND

OTHER COVERED ENTITIES (JUL 2018)

I.17 AIDAR 752.7013 CONTRACTOR-MISSION RELATIONSHIPS (DEVIATION No.

M/OAA-DEV-AIDAR-18-04c) (JUNE 2018)

I.18 FAR 52.217-8 OPTION TO EXTEND SERVICES (NOV 1999)

PART III – LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

SECTION J – LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT J.1 List of Web Links and Resources

PART IV – REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION K - REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS, AND OTHER STATEMENTS

OF OFFERORS

K.1 NOTICE LISTING SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE

K.2 FAR 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (JAN 2018)

K.3 FAR 52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT

2015) 89

K.4 FAR 52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT

2018) 91

K.5 FAR 52.209-11 REPRESENTATION BY CORPORATIONS REGARDING

DELINQUENT TAX LIABILITY OR A FELONY CONVICTION UNDER ANY

FEDERAL LAW (FEB 2016)

K.6 FAR 52.209-13 VIOLATION OF ARMS CONTROL TREATIES OR AGREEMENTS-

CERTIFICATION (JUNE 2018)

K.7 FAR 52.219-1 SMALL BUSINESS REPRESENTATIONS (OCT 2014)

K.6 FAR 52.222-22 PREVIOUS CONTRACTS AND COMPLIANCE REPORTS (FEB

1999) 97

K.7 FAR 52.222-25 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COMPLIANCE (APR 1984)

K.8 FAR 52.225-2 BUY AMERICAN CERTIFICATE (MAY 2014)

K.9 FAR 52.230-1 COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NOTICES AND

CERTIFICATION (OCT 2015)

K.10 FAR 52.230-7 PROPOSAL DISCLOSURE—COST ACCOUNTING PRACTICE

CHANGES (APR 2005)

K.11 INSURANCE—IMMUNITY FROM TORT LIABILITY

K.12 AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS

K.13 SIGNATURE

SECTION L – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

L.1 FAR 52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

(FEB 1998)

L.2 FAR 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

L.3 FAR 52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

L.4 GOVERNMENT OBLIGATION

L.5 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

L.6 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

L.7 FORMAT AND PRESENTATION

L.8 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

L.9 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE COST PROPOSAL

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

ATTACHMENT J.1 LIST OF WEB LINKS AND RESOURCES

PART I – THE SCHEDULE

SECTION B – SERVICES AND PRICE/COSTS

B.1 PURPOSE

The purpose of this contract is to provide technical assistance and other services as described in detail in Section C for the implementation of USAID/Ukraine’s program entitled “Ukraine Monitoring and Learning Support Contract.”

B.2 CONTRACT TYPE AND CONTRACT SERVICES

This is a cost plus fixed fee (CPFF) completion contract. For the consideration set forth below, the Contractor must achieve the performance objectives and deliverables or outputs described in this contract.

B.3 ESTIMATED COST, FIXED FEE, AND OBLIGATED AMOUNT

a) The estimated cost for the performance of the work required hereunder, exclusive of fixed fee, is TBD.

The fixed fee, if any, for the contract period is TBD. The total estimated cost plus fixed fee is TBD.

b) Within the estimated cost plus fixed fee (if any) specified in paragraph (a) above, the amount currently obligated and available for reimbursement of allowable costs incurred by the Contractor (and payment of fee, if any) for performance of the contract period hereunder is TBD. The Contractor must not exceed the aforementioned obligated amount.

B.4 CONTRACT BUDGET AND CEILINGS

a) The contract budget found herein is based on the Contractor’s original proposal and/or final proposal revision, which was accepted by USAID through award of this contract.

b) The following itemized budget sets forth the estimates for individual line items of cost:

ITEM Total

PROGRAM COSTS

INDIRECT COSTS

TOTAL ESTIMATED COST

FIXED FEE

TOTAL ESTIMATED COST PLUS FIXED FEE

B.5 INDIRECT COST

Pending establishment of revised provisional or final indirect cost rates, allowable indirect costs must be reimbursed on the basis of the following negotiated provisional or predetermined rates and the appropriate bases:

Description Rate Base Type Period

% 1/ 1/ 1/ % 2/ 2/ 2/ % 3/ 3/ 3/

1/ Base of Application:

Type of Rate:

Period:

2/ Base of Application:

Type of Rate:

Period:

3/ Base of Application:

Type of Rate:

Period:

B.6 COST REIMBURSABLE

The U.S. dollar costs reimbursable under this contract will be limited to those costs determined to be necessary allocable, allowable, and reasonable as determined in accordance with FAR 31 (Contract Cost Principles), FAR 52.216-7, (Allowable Cost and Payment), and FAR 52.216-8, (Fixed Fee), if applicable, and AIDAR 752.7003 (Documentation for Payment).

B.7 PAYMENT OF FIXED FEE

Payment of fixed fee, subject to the terms stated in FAR 52.216‐8, may be made upon receipt of a proper invoice. Subject to FAR 52.216‐8, Fixed Fee, payment of fixed fee shall be allocated based upon the proportion of the invoiced amount in the period covered by the invoice to the total estimated cost of the periods of the contract not including fixed fee.

In the event of discontinuance of the work in accordance with the clause of the contract entitled “Termination (Cost Reimbursement)” (FAR 52.249-6), the fee must be re-determined by mutual agreement equitably to reflect the reduction in the work actually performed. The amount by which such fee is less than, or exceeds, payments previously made on account of the fee must be paid to, or repaid by the Contractor, as applicable.

B.8 MULTI-YEAR CONTRACT AND CANCELLATION CEILING

This contract is considered non-severable, and is therefore a multi-year contract as defined in FAR

17.103. Therefore, this contract is subject to the requirements of FAR 17.106.

a. Performance under this contract during the second and subsequent years is contingent upon the appropriation of funds. All program years except the first are subject to cancellation. Cancellation shall occur by the dates specified below if the Contracting Officer:

1. notifies the Contractor that funds are not available for contract performance for any subsequent program year or

2. fails to notify the Contractor that funds are available for performance of the succeeding program year.

b. Cancellation Ceiling:

This is a CPFF type contract where the Contractor is authorized to be reimbursed for all costs which are allowable in accordance with FAR 52.216-7, “Allowable Costs and Payment.”

Therefore, the Contractor will not incur any costs which would have been amortized over the life of the contract should the contract be cancelled in accordance with FAR 52.217-2.

The Government’s liability for cancellation charges shall not exceed $TBD. This amount will be reduced in accordance with FAR 17.106-1(c)(1) at the conclusion of each program year, as follows:

Program Year Cancellation Date Cancellation Ceiling

Year 1: 2019/2020 N/A N/A Year 2: 2020/2021 DATE TBD, 2020 $TBD Year 3: 2021/2022 DATE TBD, 2021 $TBD Year 4: 2022/2023 DATE TBD, 2022 $TBD Year 5: 2023/2024 DATE TBD, 2023 $TBD

[END OF SECTION B]

SECTION C – DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/STATEMENT OF WORK

C.1 TITLE OF ACTIVITY

The title of this USAID/Ukraine activity is the Ukraine Monitoring and Learning Support Contract.

C.2 PURPOSE

The purpose of this five-year Contract is to holistically assist the USAID Regional Mission for Ukraine and Belarus (hereafter USAID/Ukraine) in its overall monitoring, and its collaborating, learning and adapting (CLA) needs over the implementation of its five-year 2018-2023 Country Development Cooperation Strategy (CDCS). This contract has two major objectives, USAID/Ukraine CDCS implementation support, and holistic support for ongoing Mission monitoring and learning needs.

The first objective, to support the CDCS implementation, primarily includes monitoring of a Mission-wide Performance Management Plan (PMP) which is an umbrella for several key performance management components. From a guidance perspective this entails assisting the Mission to efficiently and effectively fulfill its performance measurement and reporting requirements as mandated in the Automated Directives System (ADS), especially in ADS 201. More holistically, this means support in implementing the PMP, to include monitoring strategic progress, project performance, programmatic assumptions, and operational context; evaluating performance and impact; and learning and adapting from evidence. The PMP also continuously informs the allocation of resources, portfolio review processes, and Country Development Cooperation Strategy (CDCS) mid-course stocktaking. It also includes tracking evaluation needs, and designing and preparing data collection to inform reporting such as the Operational Plan (OP) and Performance Plan and Report (PPR). It consists of a CLA plan and is continuously updated over the life of the CDCS.

The second objective is to support ongoing Mission monitoring and learning needs, particularly key processes and systems that may be updated, improved, consolidated; and robust Mission capacity to sustain best practices. To this end, this objective includes activities designed to improve data collection, processes, and sharing. It takes on the task of support in telling the USAID story using PMP data and other methods. Activities will build capacity within the Mission as well as provide ad-hoc services in support of these efforts – such as facilitation. It will also support existing mapping efforts, as needed.

This objective may also include support to the Belarus Country Office, depending on needs.

C.3 BACKGROUND

USAID/Ukraine Strategy: The Mission’s 2019-2024 CDCS was approved on January 9, 2019, to carry out the USG’s development priorities in Ukraine. The main hypothesis is that the country’s European aspirations, democratic trajectory, and future prosperity and sovereignty are only achievable if corruption is meaningfully addressed, the impacts of Russia’s aggression are strategically mitigated, democratic governance is strengthened, and market-driven economic growth is inclusive and sustainable.

USAID/Ukraine has integrated J2SR (Journey to Self-Reliance) into our final CDCS document.

USAID/Ukraine has focused on concepts of Private Sector Engagement and Financing Self-Reliance in particular.

The new strategy outlines four Development Objectives (DOs) that are integrated and cross-sectoral to capitalize on our lessons learned, experience and relationships, where USAID/Ukraine has effectively complemented the work of other inter-agency and international partners, and where USAID’s comparative advantage will deliver impact.

Each Mission must prepare a Mission-wide PMP within six months of CDCS approval, and continuously use the document as a guide and repository to monitor and evaluate the work under the strategy, plan the resources needed, and deliberately plan for collaboration, learning and adapting.

Journey to Self-Reliance: USAID is seeking to realign and re-orient its policies, strategies, and program practices towards better supporting partner countries to solve their own development challenges – called the Journey to Self-Reliance. To this end, the Agency has identified a set of self-reliance metrics. These will not be measured by the PMP, but may inform Development Objective (DO) level context indicators.

The Agency has produced “Country Roadmaps” to show each country’s overall level of self-reliance, as well as its performance on the target metrics. Country Roadmaps are available on the public website here https://selfreliance.usaid.gov/.

USAID/UKRAINE CDCS - Results Framework: USAID/Ukraine’s results framework (RF) has an aspirational goal (see ADS 201.3.2.7) of “an independent, democratic, prosperous, and healthy Ukraine united around core European values,” which reflects the cumulative impact of the DOs. The RF has four such objectives:

DO1: Corruption Reduced in Target Sectors DO2: Impacts of Russia’s Aggression Mitigated DO3: Democratic Governance Strengthened DO4: Inclusive, Sustainable, Market-Driven Economic Growth

Contributing to the DOs, thirteen Intermediate Results (IRs) are distributed, and beneath them, sub-IRs.

The Mission is primarily held accountable to report on IR-level indicators, and while not required, will likely track context indicators at the DO level.

USAID/Ukraine’s final 2019-2024 CDCS/RF.

https://selfreliance.usaid.gov/

USAID/UKRAINE – Performance Management: USAID/Ukraine’s PMP will serve as a holistic, internal tool to guide strategy implementation. The document is not expected to be static, but to be updated throughout the strategy at both planned, and ad hoc intervals. A PMP must include DO monitoring plans, an Evaluation Plan, a CLA Plan, a schedule of performance management tasks and responsibilities, and a resource plan for these tasks.

The Automated Directives System (ADS) 201.3.2.16 Performance Management Plan (PMP) notes that a PMP is a living, changing, Mission-wide tool for planning and managing the processes of monitoring strategic progress, project performance, programmatic assumptions, and operational context; evaluating performance and impact; and learning and adapting from evidence. Each Mission must prepare a Mission-wide PMP and should use the PMP to inform resource allocations, the Mission’s portfolio review process, and CDCS mid-course stocktaking. The PMP is continually updated over the life of a CDCS because projects and activities are often designed after the PMP is approved, and to reflect ongoing learning and adapting. At approval, the initial PMP must include (1) DO monitoring plans (with preliminary performance indicators); (2) Evaluation Plan; (3) CLA plan; (4) schedule of performance management tasks and responsibilities; (5) Resources for performance management tasks (human and financial). See ADS 201.3.2.16 and the How-To Note: Prepare and Maintain a Performance Management Plan (PMP) for additional guidance as well as the contents of a PMP.

Performance indicators, while only a piece of a PMP, are often the most visible and tangible aspect of it.

They are used to collect, compile, analyze, verify, and report on at least one (and ideally not more than three) performance indicator (baseline, targets and actuals) for each IR and sub-IR, that monitors progress toward a DO. It may include context indicators at the DO level, and other optional indicators.

The PMP should provide explicit guidelines on the processes of data collection; and documents information in performance indicator reference sheets. Indicators are included in DO Monitoring Plans as well as a recommended Performance Indicator Summary Table.

Missions are expected to conduct high quality performance and impact evaluations of projects and activities. The Evaluation Plan, part of the PMP, must cover planned evaluations for the CDCS implementation period. The agency Evaluation Policy and ADS 201 guides evaluation management, design, and dissemination of findings. The Evaluation Plan includes specific details for each planned evaluation, including what is being evaluated, purpose, type, possible questions, estimated budget, and timing. This information will also go into the Evaluation Registry, submitted annually as part of the Performance Plan and Report. As projects and activities are designed, evaluations are expected to be added to the plan. The plan also identifies opportunities for conducting impact evaluations of pilot and innovative projects.

The PMP is also used to ensure that CLA is intentional, systematic, and resourced throughout the course of the strategy, so that learning and evidence inform project and activity design, portfolio reviews, mid-course stock-taking, and other key decision points and pause-and-reflect moments. The required CLA plan must address collaboration, strategic learning, opportunities for reflection, and resourcing for these activities. It may assess Mission CLA maturity and set a learning agenda, which explores knowledge gaps within the theory of change at any level, from strategy to projects, to activities. It can include plans to engage stakeholders, address knowledge gaps, and support enabling conditions for adaptive management throughout the PMP, and should set specific actions that include roles, outcomes, timelines, and resources.

In summary, these tasks should be included in a Schedule of Performance Management Tasks and Responsibilities. The schedule typically includes timing and responsibility for: updating the PMP;

collecting and analyzing data; conducting data quality assessments (DQAs); designing and conducting evaluations; and periodic intentional opportunities for reflection to inform adaptation. ADS 201 guides this schedule.

https://usaidlearninglab.org/library/how-note-prepare-and-maintain-performance-management-plan-pmp

Finally, the PMP must outline the human and financial resources required to fully execute the plan.

Because performance management is often under-resourced, realistic planning on required commitments can be crucial. Common costs noted in a resource plan may include estimated costs for: evaluations; MEL technical support and capacity building; staffing; collaboration; learning events; and/or DQAs.

C.4 OBJECTIVE 1: USAID/UKRAINE CDCS IMPLEMENTATION

This objective reflects the needs of the mission in CDCS implementation, to include support for ongoing PMP monitoring, learning, collaboration, and adaptation; support for PMP updates1; and responsiveness to a fluid environment.

In preparation for updating the PMP, the contractor must review and reference all agency policies, and guidance on the preparation of PMPs. Such policies and guidance includes:

a. The Automated Directives System (ADS) – This establishes the characteristics and requirements for the development of PMPs. The relevant sections of the ADS (particularly Chapter 201) shall serve as the primary resource document for the development of the PMP.

The contractor shall ensure that the PMP, eventually accepted by the Mission under the contract, meets all the requirements established in the ADS.

b. The Agency Evaluation Policy – This provides the policy framework for conducting evaluations of agency funded projects and activities and provides the clarity to the terms used in evaluation, states the purpose of evaluation, roles and responsibilities of agency operating units, evaluation practices and requirements. The contractor shall ensure that the PMP includes a detailed evaluation plan for USAID/Ukraine and has adequate tasks that will help the Mission to comply with the policy. Note: the ADS takes precedence over the Evaluation Policy, if there are any contradictions the ADS is the authoritative source.

c. The USAID/Ukraine Strategy Guidance – The USAID/Ukraine CDCS describes the results framework which will frame the PMP and provides initial illustrative indicators for the Development Objectives, and Intermediate Results. This CDCS builds on USAID/Ukraine’s first CDCS and the lessons learned from that strategy. Both CDCS’ include relevant operational context, critical assumptions, risks, management structure, plans for learning and adapting, and discussion of scenarios. In addition, the Integrated Country Strategy for the mission as a whole, and the Joint Regional Strategy (both found at https://www.state.gov/s/d/rm/c6113.htm) also guide our work.

d. The USAID/ Ukraine Mission Orders and templates relating to Performance Monitoring, and Evaluation–Mission Orders establish the Mission’s internal guidance and policy on how to prepare a PMP, carry out Data Quality Assessments, and Evaluations.

e. PPL Bureau’s “How-To-Note: Preparing a Performance Management Plan” which provides an overview of the PMP and outlines practical steps for developing a PMP in the USAID-context.

f. ADS 201 Additional Help document: Drafting a Collaborating, Learning and Adapting Plan and CLA Plan Template.

g. CLA Framework and Key Concepts including MEL tool kits.

1 In the event the PMP is not finalized prior to contract award, the Contractor must also support the Mission in finalizing the PMP.

https://www.state.gov/s/d/rm/c6113.htm https://usaidlearninglab.org/library/drafting-collaborating,-learning,-and-adapting-cla-plan-and-cla-plan-template https://usaidlearninglab.org/library/drafting-collaborating,-learning,-and-adapting-cla-plan-and-cla-plan-template https://usaidlearninglab.org/library/cla-framework-and-maturity-tool-overview https://usaidlearninglab.org/mel-toolkits

h. PPL Bureau’s “Performance Management Plan (PMP) Toolkit” which is a resource, though not definitive, providing detailed guidance for developing and operationalizing PMPs, including specific templates and tools.

i. Sector-specific and Ukraine-relevant strategies, policies, and initiative reporting guidelines as needed, to include CDCS analyses such as USAID/Ukraine’s April 2017 Gender Analysis.

j. USAID/Ukraine documents related to DO team management structure, and the links between DO teams, projects and activities.

For context, the Contractor is expected to reference existing general and sector-specific Government of Ukraine strategies and development plans and priorities, as well as the strategies and indicators of other donors, some of which is collected and analyzed by the Mission.

Tasks under this objective include, but are not limited to, the following:

Task 1.1. Launch. To inform the launch, the Contractor must meet with all DO Teams, Program Office and with Mission Management, to learn about the Mission’s vision for the CDCS and PMP and reporting requirements related to Agency priorities, initiatives, and earmarks. The Contractor, in partnership with the Program office, and contingent on timing, must conduct PMP/Contractor Launch Workshops for specific audiences, such as Mission management, staff, and Implementing Partners. The Launch Workshop foci must be agreed upon with the COR.

Task 1.2. Workshops. The Contractor, in partnership with the Program office, must conduct holistic PMP Monitoring/Update Sessions with key Mission stakeholders (such as DO team leaders, support offices, and others). These sessions may address the entire PMP, consider planned and existing projects and activities, indicators, baselines, targets, evaluation planning, learning, collaboration, scheduling, and resources. PMP updates must include complete PIRS. The workshops must consider planning for future learning, and pause and reflect opportunities. PMP workshops must engage stakeholders outside the mission such as Implementing Partners, Government of Ukraine, and other development actors, seeking to align/check-in, where appropriate.

PMP Monitoring/Updating Sessions must involve Mission members and others in checking, following, and reflecting on accurate and impactful evaluation needs and questions, including for new activities and projects. Sessions must identify whole-of-project evaluations during the CDCS timeframe. The sessions must also address collaboration, learning, and adapting and review the Missions CLA Plan. The CLA Plan must provide a systematic approach to working with partners, asking key questions around learning, and intentionally using learning for adaptation of programming to better meet development objectives. It will address environmental enabling conditions such as organizational culture, processes, mechanisms, and required resources. The PMP sessions must address scheduling of performance management tasks and responsibilities over the life of the CDCS, as well as periodic and intentional opportunities for reflection to inform adaptation, including Portfolio Reviews and mid-course stocktaking of the CDCS.

Task 1.3. Updating PMP2. The Contractor must support the Program Office in ongoing updates to the PMP, including as new projects or activities are designed, or existing ones are adapted; responding to any changes based on the Journey to Self-Reliance; keeping indicator tracking tables up to date and analyzing/visualizing data to track progress over time; planning for events such as portfolio reviews and CDCS mid-course stock-taking (Task 6); annual data collection for PPR reporting and evaluation registry updates; and incorporating changes and adaptations from adaptive management results and learning events. The Contractor must meet all ADS requirements and include, at a minimum in PMP updates:

2 This assumes the PMP is completed by contract award. If it is not completed, the Contractor must also support the Mission in finalizing the PMP.

a. CDCS Results Framework. This item will be provided to the Contractor by USAID as part of the larger USAID/Ukraine 2019-2024 CDCS and may be excerpted by the Contractor for inclusion as this section, should it change.

b. Development Objective Monitoring Plan.

The Contractor must ensure the Mission is on track in DO monitoring, including indicator tracking and tracking against the Scenario Surveillance Plan (see below, point h.), adding additional content if needed to meet the ADS requirement requested by the COR, or otherwise beneficial in enhancing the overall value of the PMP. This must include developing/reviewing:

▪ Indicators: Performance Indicators to measure progress for the CDCS Results Framework, including project-level indicators from approved PADs; context Indicators at the DO level, for tracking the broader context of strategy implementation; and required, as applicable, standard foreign assistance indicators for annual Performance Plan and Report and relevant initiatives

The Contractor must support development of appropriate indicators for new projects and activities; ensure alignment with the Strategy; consider relevance for managerial decision making at the strategy level, e.g., performance indicators that monitor significant outcomes that help to determine if a development hypothesis remains relevant and whether expected progress toward a DO is on track; indicators likely to be reviewed during a portfolio review or used for making decisions about adaptations or amendments to the strategy; and indicators frequently used to respond to Washington requests.

▪ Data quality assessment procedures that will be used to understand the various dimensions of data quality and associated trade-offs, in order to understand whether and to what extent performance data can be relied upon for decision-making.

c. Evaluation Plan:

▪ The Contractor must update the Evaluation Plan with the Program Office and include all

DOs. The Contractor must review and refine it in consultation with the DO Teams and the Program Office, over the life of the CDCS. The Contractor must discuss identification of a whole of project evaluation and opportunities for impact evaluations.

d. Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting Plan:

▪ The Contractor must update the CLA Plan based on input from mission stakeholders during pause and reflect moments and must address strategic collaboration; learning at the strategy level; opportunities for reflecting on progress to inform adaptation; and resourcing these activities. The CLA Plan also addresses support for learning, including MEL and CLA capacity-building among mission staff.

▪ CLA updating must also address roles and responsibilities, expected outcomes, timeline, resources, and next steps.

e. Schedule for Performance Management Tasks and Responsibilities:

▪ In consultation with the Program Office and teams, the Contractor must prepare/follow a detailed performance management task, responsibility, and timing matrix for inclusion into the PMP. The matrix must specify roles and responsibilities for updating and revising the PMP, collecting and analyzing data, conducting DQAs, designing and conducting evaluations, and periodic and intentional opportunities for reflection to inform adaptation, including portfolio review and mid-course stock-taking of the CDCS.

f. Resources for Performance Management Tasks:

▪ The Contractor must revisit the PMP performance management tasks and consult with the mission to discuss the human and financial resources needed for planned MEL and CLA efforts described in the PMP.

Task 1.4. Baseline Data Collection Plan. The Contractor must Develop a Baseline Data Collection Plan and collect baseline data where needed. The Baseline Data Collection Plan must identify which indicators require additional primary data collection and identify potential methodologies and estimate level of resources needed.

Task 1.5. PIRS. The Contractor must work closely with the Program Office and DO Teams to ensure that all Performance Indicator Reference Sheets (PIRS) for all indicators are complete, and robust. The Contractor must ensure that existing and new PIRSs meet requirements, are clear enough to ensure standard/consistent collection/analysis and reporting of data; and are ground-truthed for collection and use. See ADS 201maf, Performance Indicator Reference Sheet (PIRS) Guidance & Template, available at https://www.usaid.gov/ads/policy/200/201maf

Task 1.6. Strategy-related Events. The Contractor must support the Program Office to plan and facilitate key events and actions related to ongoing management of the Strategy. These include:

a. CDCS Mid-Course Stocktaking. In partnership with the Program Office, technical teams and DO teams, the Contractor must plan and facilitate a CDCS Mid-Course Stocktaking exercise around the end of the second year of CDCS implementation.3 During this exercise, the Contractor must engage with stakeholders to assess strategy-level results on a cumulative basis, analyze themes coming out of performance reviews, suggest actionable steps, and propose and consider CDCS, PADs, or PMP modifications. More precisely, updates include:

■ Indicators. In the event of amendments to the CDCS or to projects or activities, or the commencement or termination of new projects or activities, the Contractor must meet with relevant DO Team(s) to propose changes to PMP indicators. Once approved by Mission stakeholders, the indicators will be updated in the PMP, PIRs, and DQA documents, as needed.

■ Data Quality Assessments (DQAs) and Performance Indicator Reference Sheets (PIRSs). The Contractor must conduct, organize, maintain, and flag for update/update DQAs and PIRs as needed, in consultation with the COR. The Contractor must maintain and track the status of DQAs for all CDCS indicators.

b. Portfolio Reviews. Support the Program Office to plan and facilitate CDCS portfolio reviews.

In partnership with the Program Office, technical teams and DO teams, the Contractor must plan and facilitate at least one annual Mission-wide portfolio review, covering all DOs. During this exercise, the Contractor must focus on themes as directed by the COR, in addition to building access to information such that rigorous analysis may take place.

c. Scenario Surveillance Plan. The Contractor must develop a Scenario Surveillance Plan4 that periodically tracks Ukraine’s position relative to the multiple scenarios identified in the CDCS, 3 ADS 201 requires the Mission to conduct at least on Mid-Course Stocktaking exercise during the course of CDCS implementation to better align the implementation of the Mission’s programs with changes to the context and Agency direction. See USAID Learning Lab, Stocktaking Module (https://usaidlearninglab.org/stocktaking-module) and the How-To Note: CDCS Mid-Course Stocktaking, available at https://usaidlearninglab.org/library/how-note-cdcs-mid-course-stocktaking.

4 Additional information on scenario surveillance appears in the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning section of the USAID/Ukraine 2019-2024 CDCS, including DO-specific information on potential adaptations and programmatic shifts that could occur if Ukraine shifts from Scenario A (the most likely) to B, C, or D.

https://www.usaid.gov/ads/policy/200/201maf https://www.usaid.gov/ads/policy/200/201maf https://www.usaid.gov/ads/policy/200/201maf https://usaidlearninglab.org/stocktaking-module https://usaidlearninglab.org/stocktaking-module https://usaidlearninglab.org/library/how-note-cdcs-mid-course-stocktaking based on indicators, milestones, or tripwires.5 The Contractor must recommend actions that can respond to changes in the country environment, including modifications to the scenarios themselves when appropriate.

d. Other. The Contractor must support other events in support of the Strategy as requested by the

COR.

Task 1.7. Final Assessment. The Contractor must conduct a final assessment. The portfolio review during the final year must include a review of the cumulative achievements toward the DOs and IRs, with the results documented to support knowledge management. Finally, the Contractor must complete a report that analyzes Mission performance over the course of the five-year CDCS, evaluates the methods and tools used by the Mission to plan and monitor its work, and provides recommendations for the next CDCS Design Team to utilize in creating the successor strategy.

C.5 OBJECTIVE 2: HOLISTIC SUPPORT FOR ONGOINGMISSION MONITORING

AND LEARNING NEEDS

This objective reflects the needs of the mission with regard to sustaining and strengthening the work of the Mission. This includes tracking, analyzing, and using data efficiently; ensuring staff have robust capabilities or expanded capacity; ensuring that telling the story of USAID activities is well-executed; and providing ad-hoc, smaller scale services such as facilitation and mapping. This objective may also include support to the Belarus Country Office, depending on needs.

Tasks under this objective include, but are not limited to, the following:

Task 2.1. Data Management. The Contractor must provide data cleaning, analysis, and visualization, such as one-pagers and other documents, on both a periodic and ad-hoc basis. Software requirements have not yet been identified.

Task 2.2. Capacity Development. The Contractor must provide capacity-building opportunities for mission staff in the areas of CLA and monitoring. This learning may be in the form of brown bag presentations, interactive training sessions, mentorship on specific tasks, and preparing mission staff for engagement on evaluations. Using tools such as the CLA maturity matrix, with additional measurements on practices and skills, the Contractor must create a baseline of skills the mission has, based on analysis within the first six months of the contract. The Contractor must then work to plan capacity-building, and measure skills, abilities, and practices annually, to track change.

Task 2.3. Database Support.

The Contractor must analyze the Mission’s procedures for generating information for periodic reports and data calls, including but not limited to the PPR, OP, Mission Resource Request, site visit tracking and the various formats required for each report. In line with USAID policy and requirements, the Contractor must prepare a written recommendations report within the first year, recognizing current Agency policy, on how to streamline collection, management and use of the data, and information, and how to use management information systems to improve efficiency. The Contractor may support creation of a local database, using basic tools such as EXCEL to unify and track data within the mission, working with the Financial Management and Contracting offices of the mission.

5 Indicators may include PMP indicators or additional indicators measured or collected by the Contractor.

Milestones may include more expansive factors, e.g., per capita GDP rising above or falling below a measure of poverty. Tripwires may include specific actions taken by government, such as satisfying a set of IMF anti-corruption requirements to receive a tranche of funding, failure to ratify a key international convention, or some other major event.

Task 2.4. Outreach and Communications, Facilitation, and Mapping.

The Contractor may be asked to provide additional support such as communications services and media outreach, possibly including crafting press releases, contacting media, providing videography and photography services, addressing outreach on social media platforms, increasing or improving outreach, editing public documents, disseminating information and the USAID story, and similar tasks. The Contractor may be asked to support the Mission in putting together events and activities, for public consumption and/or learning, such as retreats or surveys. The Contractor may also be asked to provide services such as media monitoring and press clipping services, group facilitation, polling, and mapping tasks for the regional mission. Mapping tasks may include support for geo-enabled portfolio management, assistance with base data collection, verification, and management, and Geographic Information System (GIS) technical assistance and/or capacity building.

C.6 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

The Mission will appoint a COR and Alternate COR (A/COR) to provide technical guidance and administrative oversight in connection with this Contract implementation, to review and approve the work plan, and to review and accept draft and final reports.

To facilitate planning, the COR will make available to the Contractor the following documents within five working days of the award effective date:

● Journey to Self-Reliance materials

● Mission Evaluation Registry or equivalent

● CDCS 2012-2017 (2012, public version);

● CDCS 2019-2024 (when approved);

● Results Framework for CDCS 2019-2024;

● CDCS-related analysis (Gender and Environment)

● Recent USAID/Ukraine evaluation reports

● List of Mission Project Appraisal Documents (PADs) and activities, implementing partners, and counterparts

● Annual PPR data worksheets (as they are provided to USAID by Department of State);

● Available FY 2017-2018 Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plans (MELPs) with performance monitoring data for USAID/Ukraine PADS and activities;

● Maps showing the geographical concentration of USAID/Ukraine activities.

[END OF SECTION C]

SECTION D – BRANDING AND MARKING

D.1 AIDAR 752.7009 MARKING (JAN 1993)

a) It is USAID policy that USAID-financed commodities and shipping containers, and project construction sites and other project locations be suitably marked with the USAID emblem. Shipping containers are also to be marked with the last five digits of the USAID financing document number.