Amendment_Nr._0002_continuation.pdf
PDF 177 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70Z080-19-Q-P4503600
About this file
Amendment 0002 continuation
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_Nr._0003_continuation.pdf | ||
| Amendment_Nr._0003.pdf | ||
| Amendment_Nr._0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment_Nr._0001.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination_(Attachment_3).pdf | ||
| Solicitation_Nr._70Z080-19-Q-P4503600.pdf | ||
| Schedule_B_(Attachment_2).xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| Statement_of_Work_(TAHOMA_FY19_DDL_Dining__Lodging_Rev-2).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation Nr. 70Z080-19-Q-P4503600 Amendment 0002 Page 2
Question: As vendor does not have past experience in providing off-sight meals with local restaurants, is it acceptable to provide past experience for lodging and on-site meals?
Answer: Yes, on-site meals would be acceptable. Solicitation states past performance should be relevant. Experience in providing on-site meals would be considered as comparable to providing meals off site for demonstrating experience in providing dining options.
End of Amendment Nr. 0002
File details come from the government source that posted it.