Justification and Approval for Other Than Full and Open Competition.pdf

Last Updated 11/01/24

U.S. COAST GUARD JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES (SAP) FOR FAR 13.106-1(b)

PURCHASE REQUEST OR REQUISITION NUMBER:

2025189-GM03

ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE, INCLUDING OPTIONS:

(Over Micro-Purchase Threshold, but up to the SAT)

AUTHORITY JUSTIFICATION TYPE

☒ 13.106-1(b)(1) ONLY ONE SOURCE REASONABLY AVAILABLE (e.g., urgency, exclusive licensing agreements, or industrial mobilization).

☐ FAR 5.102(a)(6), FAR

11.105, FAR 13.106-1

(b) (1)

BRAND NAME – Items peculiar to one manufacturer: The particular brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government’s requirements, and market research indicates other companies’ similar products, or products lacking the particular feature, do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet, the agency’s needs.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED AND THE INTENDED USE:

The United States Coast Guard (USCG) intends to purchase the item shown in the table below on a sole source basis directly from the

Original Equipment Manufacture’s (OEM), ULTRAX Aerospace, Inc (Cage Code: 07PR7).

Nomenclature National Stock Number (NSN) Part Number (PN) Quantity

TEST SET, ELECT STAB 4920-01-526-5799 02-1103-01 1 each

The Stabilator Test Set is used to perform functional checks on the MH-60T airframe by providing simulated signals to various aircraft components and then monitoring the component’s response. Based on the signal sent by the Test Set and the resulting response, the technician can determine whether a component is functioning properly and troubleshoot any discrepancies.

SUGGESTED SOURCE NAME, ADDRESS, & UNIQUE ENTITY IDENTIFIER (UEI):

ULTRAX AEROSPACE INC (CAGE Code: 07PR7)

4200 NE Sun Ct.

Lee’s Summit, MO 64064-4064 USA

UEI: JJ9YKA8NYKY4

RATIONALE FOR JUSTIFICATION TYPE SELECTED ABOVE TO INCLUDE RELEVANT INFORMATION GAINED

THROUGH YOUR MARKET RESEARCH TO SUPPORT THE JUSTIFICATION TYPE:

The Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) of these Test Sets is Ultrax Aerospace, Inc. (CAGE Code 07PR7). The use of this specific

Test Set on the MH-60T airframe is prescribed by the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Maintenance Manual AT-822QA-MIB-

000. The Navy is the lead agency for all maintenance, repair, and overhaul actions on the MH-60T aircraft. The Test Sets to be overhauled are highly specialized and have been designed and manufactured by Ultrax Aerospace, Inc. (CAGE Code 07PR7). As the OEM of this item, Ultrax Aerospace owns all rights to the service manuals, technical data, performance specifications, and drawings for the Test Set, including its integrated software, which are required for the repair and calibration of the Test Sets. The rights to the technical data necessary to have this item repaired and calibrated by any vendor other than the OEM are not owned by the Government.

Market research was conducted using both Government and commercial sources. This included querying the following information systems and web sites: Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Federal Logistics Information Service (FLIS); Department of Defense Electronic

Mall (DoD EMall); the General Services Administration’s (GSA) on-line purchasing service – GSA Advantage!®; Inventory Locator

Service e-marketplace (ILSmart); internet search engines; and the OEM’s web site. These services are not available from any mandatory

Government source IAW FAR 8.002 or from any non-mandatory source IAW FAR 8.004. ULTRAX does not have any other authorized distributors. A combined synopsis/solicitation will be posted to the Contract Opportunities section of the web site at www.sam.gov. All responsible sources may submit a capability statement, proposal, or quotation which shall be considered by the agency.

https://www.acquisition.gov/far/13.106-1 https://www.acquisition.gov/far/5.102 https://www.acquisition.gov/far/11.105 https://www.acquisition.gov/far/11.105 https://www.acquisition.gov/far/13.106-1 https://www.acquisition.gov/far/13.106-1 http://www.sam.gov/

Last Updated 11/01/24

CONTRACTING OFFICER - FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE DETERMINATION METHODS:

☐ MARKET RESEARCH

☒ COMPARISON OF PROPOSED PRICE WITH PRICES FOUND REASONABLE ON PREVIOUS PURCHASES

☐ CURRENT PRICE LIST

☒ COMPARISON WITH SIMILAR ITEMS IN A RELATED INDUSTRY

☐ COMPARISON TO IGCE

CONTRACTING OFFICER’S PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE (EXPLAIN)

☐ OTHER (EXPLAIN)

SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF TECHNICAL AND REQUIREMENTS POC

DATE

SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

DATE