Attachment_3_-_Topics_Covered_by_USCG_Instructors.pdf

RFP: 70Z02319RPBM00000

ATTACHMENT 3 – TOPICS COVERED BY USCG INSTRUCTORS

The following topics will be covered by the Coast Guard instructors:

1. The scope and recommended procedures [13 Major Accomplishments] for conducting a Certificate of Compliance Examination on a liquefied gas carrier as outlined in the FGCE TTP. In addition the following will also be discussed:

a. The Coast Guard accepts valid IMO Certificates of Fitness. For vessels with a

Certificate of Fitness, the Coast Guard does not normally inspect cargo containment systems, unless the vessel has a serious containment system problem, the vessel is in U.S. waters, and the vessel makes the affected containment system gas-free. Normally, Coast Guard focus on containment systems is limited to observations on deck, observations of gas detection and tank instrumentation systems, and monitoring inter-barrier space purge system performance and inert gas consumption.

b. The inspector or PSCO does not enter hold spaces or ballast tanks adjacent to the cargo holds unless they have clear grounds to do so and these spaces are made gas-free.

c. What cargo specific characteristics and safety concerns should be addressed during the Pre-Exam Safety Meeting in accordance with CG policy, the CG Marine Safety Manual and the FGCE TTP.

2. The four design areas where 46 CFR 154 exceeds the requirements outlined in the International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk (IGC Code).

a. Crack-arresting steels at sheer strake, deck stringer and turn of the bilge -checked by Marine Safety Center. The inspector or PSCO does not need to review.

b. Lower Hull Design Temperatures - checked by Marine Safety Center. The inspector or PSCO does not need to review. Which U.S. waters a vessel may operate based on its ambient design temperature criteria and secondary barrier requirements.

c. No Venting of Cargo in U.S. Waters - The inspector or PSCO should verify the ship is configured to normally re-liquefy or burn boil-off while in U.S. waters. If emergency conditions exist, the prohibition against tank venting. The three allowable methods to maintain cargo tank pressure and temperature in order to comply with the “no venting to the atmosphere” requirement

d. Lower MARVS on Cargo Tanks - The inspector or PSCO should confirm safety relief valve settings (per servicing certificate) with those listed on the Subchapter O Endorsement. When a vessel is authorized to use Maximum Allowable Relief Valve Settings (MARVS) based on its vessel particulars & type of installed cargo tank(s) as outlined in CG-ENG Policy Letter 04-12

e. How to confirm MSC’s completion of the Subchapter O Plan Review process.

3. Substandard conditions outlined in the Coast Guard Marine Safety Manual, relating specifically to a liquefied gas carrier that may lead to a detention, denial of entry or expulsion from port by the Coast Guard. Such as:

DETENTION

Cargo Systems

1. Transportation of a cargo not listed on the International Certificate of Fitness (COF) or

Certificate of Fitness (COF).

2. Transportation of a cargo required to be inhibited without a valid Certificate of Inhibition.

3. Inoperative Gas Detection System.

4. Inoperative pressure alarms installed in cargo tanks.

5. Missing or defective quick closing valves.

6. Missing or defective cargo tank Pressure Relief/Safety Valves.

7. Serious leaks from cargo piping.

8. A bulkhead that is not gastight.

9. An inoperable ventilation system in cargo areas.

10. Defective air locks.

11. Electrical installations not intrinsically safe or do not comply with corresponding code requirements.

12. Missing closing devices for accommodations or service spaces.

Documentation

1. Documents not available.

2. Document missing name of its issuing authority.

3. Disparities between actual condition of vessel and documentation listing.

4. Document lacks an issue date, signature of the duly authorized official issuing the document, or seal or stamp of the issuing authority.

SOLAS

1. Absence, insufficient capacity or serious deterioration of any lifesaving appliances.

2. Absence, insufficient capacity, or serious deterioration of any firefighting appliances or fire protection.

3. Absence, substantial deterioration, or failure of proper operation of cargo deck area fire protection.

4. Absence of non-sparking exhaust ventilation for cargo pump/machinery rooms.

5. Number, composition, or certification of crew not corresponding to safe manning document.

STCW

1. Failure of seafarers to hold a certificate, to have an appropriate certificate, or to have valid dispensation or to provide documentary proof that the seafarer has applied for an endorsement to the flag state administration.

2. Failure to comply with the applicable safe manning requirements of the flag state administration.

3. Failure to provide proof of professional proficiency for the duties assigned to seafarers for the safety of the ship.

DENIAL OF ENTRY/EXPULSION

1. Incompatible cargoes stowed in adjacent tanks.

2. Cargoes being carried that are not authorized by the Certificate of Compliance.

3. Serious cargo leaks from tanks or piping systems.

4. LNG/LPG Gas Detection System inoperative.

5. Vessel carrying cargoes not authorized for carriage by the vessel’s IMO Documentation