Axiom JA - NB signed.pdf

PDF 811 KB Posted

Attached to
Support and maintenance for AXIOM
Solicitation number
70VT1520P00001
Issued by

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

OIG Justification and Approval for Procurement Action (December 2017) Page 1 of 6

Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General

Justification and Approval for Procurement Action

Instructions: This form shall be completed for all actions over $3,500 that require a justification for other than full and open competition. All sections must be completed and not left blank. If additional space is needed to complete any sections, use Section 12 on the last page of this form. The program office shall have their designated official sign on the last page. The completed form shall be included as part of the procurement package.

Section 1 - Agency and Contracting Activity

This justification and approval supports the procurement action as described herein. The procurement action will be performed by the Office of Inspector General, Office of Management, Acquisitions Division for the Office of .

Section 2 - Nature and/or Description of the Action Being Approved

Project Title (As it will appear in the solicitation and resultant contract/order.)

Nature of Approval Request:

Other than Full and Open Competition (FAR Part 6, Open Market)

Exception to Fair Opportunity (FAR Part 16, Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contracts)

Limited Source Justification (FAR Part 8, Federal Supply Schedules)

Section 3 - Description of Supplies/Services and Cost Estimate

Provide a brief narrative description of the project (or modification).

Identification Number (Specify the requisition number or posed solicitation number.)

Procurement History of the Proposed Action, if any. Provide historical contract data (include contract number, period of performance, contractor, and total award value.)

Total Estimated Dollar Value (Inclusive of options which will be evaluated pre-award unless otherwise stated.)

Performance/Delivery: The base period of performance is expected to be through with option periods.

OIG Justification and Approval for Procurement Action (December 2017) Page 2 of 6

Section 4 - Authority Cited

The authority permitting A) Other Than Full Open Competition, B) Limited Sources, or C) Exception to Fair Opportunity is indicated below:

A) Open Market Acquisition (FAR Subpart 6.3) - Other than Full and Open Competition

41 USC § 3304 (a)(1), FAR 6.302-1. ONLY ONE RESPONSIBLE SOURCE and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements. This authority includes brand name.

NOTE: FAR 6.302-1(c) Application for brand name descriptions. (1) An acquisition or portion of an acquisition that uses a brand name description or other purchase description to specify a particular brand name, product, or feature of a product, peculiar to one manufacturer - (i) Does not provide for full and open competition, regardless of the number of sources solicited; and (ii) Shall be justified and approved in accordance with 6.303 and 6.301.

41 USC § 3304(a)(2), FAR 6.302-2. UNUSUAL AND COMPELLING URGENCY.

41 USC § 3304(a)(3), FAR 6.302-3. INDUSTRIAL MOBILIZATION; ENGINEERING, DEVELOPMENTAL, OR

RESEARCH CAPABILITY; OR EXPERT SERVICES.

41 USC § 3304(a)(4), FAR 6.302-4. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT.

41 USC § 3304(a)(5), FAR 6.302-5. AUTHORIZED OR REQUIRED BY STATUTE.

Identify statute:

41 USC § 3304(a)(6), FAR 6.302-6. NATIONAL SECURITY.

41 USC § 3304(a)(7), FAR 6.302-7. PUBLIC INTEREST (Shall not be used when any other circumstance is applicable.

See NOTE under "Approvals").

B) Federal Supply Schedules (FAR Subpart 8.4) - Limited Sources

40 USC § 121(c)(1), FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(A). An URGENT AND COMPELLING NEED exists, and following the procedures would result in unacceptable delays.

40 USC § 121(c)(1), FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B). ONLY ONE SOURCE is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized. Note: FAR 8.405-6(b). Items peculiar to one manufacturer. An item peculiar to one manufacturer can be a particular brand name, product, or a feature of a product, peculiar to one manufacturer. A brand name item, whether available on one or more schedule contracts, is an item peculiar to one manufacturer. (1) Brand name specifications shall not be used unless the particular brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government's requirements, and market research indicates other companies' similar products, or products lacking the particular feature, do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet, the agency's needs.

40 USC § 121(c)(1), FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(C). In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a LOGICAL FOLLOW-ON to an original Federal Supply Schedule order provided that the original order was placed in accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering procedures. The original order BPA must not have been previously issued under sole-source or limited-sources procedures.

C) Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite Quantity (FAR Subpart 16.5) - Exception to Fair Opportunity

41 USC § 4106(c)(1), FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(A). The agency need for the supplies or services is so URGENT that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays.

41 USC § 4106(c)(2), FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(B). ONLY ONE AWARDEE is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized.

41 USC § 4106(c)(3), FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(C). The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency because it is a LOGICAL FOLLOW-ON to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.

41 USC § 4106(c)(4), FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(D). It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a MINIMUM GUARANTEE.

FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(E). For orders exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, a STATUTE expressly authorizes or requires that the purchase be made from a specified source.

OIG Justification and Approval for Procurement Action (December 2017) Page 3 of 6

Section 5 - Reason for Authority Cited

Provide rationale that supports the use of the authority cited. If applicable, identify the proposed or potential contractor(s), and include an in-depth discussion for the proposed contractor's unique qualifications for fulfilling the contract requirements. For example, if the authority is FAR 6.302-2,"Unusual and compelling urgency," include the required schedule and lead-time involved along with a discussion of the serious injury to the Government which would result if award of a contract is delayed.

Describe efforts under this procurement action to ensure offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable. Efforts may include industry days, Requests for Information, Sources Sought announcements, etc. Also, describe the extent of competition anticipated for this acquisition (i.e., none, limited, etc.).

Section 6 - Actions Taken to Increase Competition

Include a statement by the contracting officer that the anticipated cost will be evaluated for price fairness and reasonableness, and provide the basis for this determination. The steps that will be taken to ensure the final contract price will be fair and reasonable may include: results of market research; current price lists, catalogs, or advertisements; comparison with similar items in a related industry;

comparison to an independent Government estimate; or another reasonable basis. Describe the extent of cost or price analysis anticipated including the requirement for certified cost or pricing data, technical evaluations, and audits (FAR 6.303-2(a)(7)).

Section 7 - Determination of Fair and Reasonable Pricing

OIG Justification and Approval for Procurement Action (December 2017) Page 4 of 6

Describe the market research that was conducted and the results of that effort (see FAR Part 10). Examples of market research include:

• Issuing a Sources Sought announcement in FedBizOpps (FBO);

• Publishing a Request For Information;

• Reviewing literature published by qualified organizations;

• Contacting knowledgeable acquisition and program officials in Government and industry regarding market capabilities; and

• Convening a pre-solicitation conference to exchange information with the marketplace.

If market research was not conducted, provide an explanation. Note: Issuing the FBO notice does not, in and of itself, constitute market research.

Section 8 - Market Survey

Cite any other factors not mentioned earlier in the justification as to why the requirement cannot be competed to the fullest extent. Also, if applicable:

(a) explain why technical data packages, specifications, engineering descriptions, statements of work, or purchase descriptions suitable for full and open competition have not been developed or are not available for a competitive acquisition;

(b) when the requirement can only be satisfied by one responsible source for a follow-on acquisition [see FAR 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii)], indicate whether there would be (i) unacceptable delays in fulfilling the agency's requirements and/or (ii) duplication of cost by award to another organization and, if so,provide an estimate of the cost duplication and how it was derived;

(c) if the justification is based on unusual and compelling urgency, indicate (using data, estimated cost, or other rationale) the extent and nature of the harm that the OIG would incur and/or the unacceptable delays that would occur. Also, explain whether the proposed period of performance is the minimum acceptable period necessary to meet mission requirements, including why a shorter period is not advisable. If future extensions are anticipated, indicate what steps will be taken to encourage and solicit competition. Note: The length of a contract or order awarded under these circumstances cannot exceed one year unless approved by the Head of the OIG OM Acquisitions Division. Provide the rationale as to the extent and nature of the harm to the Government.

Section 9 - Other Factors Supporting the Use of Other than Full and Open Competition

OIG Justification and Approval for Procurement Action (December 2017) Page 5 of 6

List the sources, if any, that have expressed an interest, in writing, in the acquisition and provide an explanation of why they are not being considered. If no expressions of interest have been received, enter "No other sources have expressed an interest," in writing, in the proposed acquisition.

Any responses, such as capability statements, received in response to a published notice (e.g., a Sources Sought notice or Request for Information) must be evaluated. Include all responses as an attachment to this Justification and Approval, along with the names of the individuals who participated in a review of those responses and a copy of the communication to each organization that responded. In addition, document any requests made to the CO by interested organizations for a copy of the solicitation or SOW with the following information: (a) the name of and contact information for the organization that submitted the request; (b) any communications with the requestor; and (c) the disposition of the request.

Section 10 - Interested Sources

Provide a brief statement as to whether or not there are future plans to acquire the same type of supplies or services, e.g., further extensions or renewals by competitive or other means. If subsequent acquisitions are anticipated, state the actions taken, or anticipated, to avoid continued noncompetitive acquisition of the requirement and provide a schedule for accomplishing those actions. Note: This may involve re-competing a successor requirement at a logical juncture in the phasing of the project or "breaking out" segments of the requirement to facilitate competition, where feasible. If no actions have been or will be undertaken to overcome barriers to competition for future acquisitions, so indicate and provide an explanation.

Section 11 - Proposed Actions the Agency May Take to Remove or Overcome Any Barriers to Competition Before Any Subsequent Acquisition for the Required Supplies or Services

OIG Justification and Approval for Procurement Action (December 2017) Page 6 of 6

Section 12 - Additional Space

Section 13 - Certification and Approvals

DateSignature

In accordance with the authority(ies) indicated in Section 4 of this document and agency procedures, all justification documents must follow the approval process stated below.

The undersigned hereby certifies that the information provided herein to support this justification is complete and accurate to the best of his or her knowledge and belief.

Requisitioner/Program Office Official

DateSignatureContracting Officer

DateSignatureAcquisitions Division Supervisor

OIG Justification and Approval for Procurement Action (December 2017) Page of .\dhs%20logo%20seal.jpg DHS Seal Department of Homeland Security Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General Office of Inspector General Justification and Approval for Procurement Action Justification and Approval for Procurement Action Instructions: This form shall be completed for all actions over $3,500 that require a justification for other than full and open competition. All sections must be completed and not left blank. If additional space is needed to complete any sections, use Section 12 on the last page of this form. The program office shall have their designated official sign on the last page. The completed form shall be included as part of the procurement package.

Section 1 - Agency and Contracting Activity Section 1 - Agency and Contracting Activity This justification and approval supports the procurement action as described herein. The procurement action will be performed by the Office of Inspector General, Office of Management, Acquisitions Division for the Office of .

Section 2 - Nature and/or Description of the Action Being Approved Section 2 - Nature and/or Description of the Action Being Approved Nature of Approval Request:

Nature of Approval Request Section 3 - Description of Supplies/Services and Cost Estimate Section 3 - Description of Supplies/Services and Cost Estimate Performance/Delivery: The base period of performance is expected to be through with option periods.

Enter the base period of performance as well as option periods.

F:\US.Customs-ReaderExt-Internal\Completed\Batch1\CBP-303.xft 1.0

CBP-303

{CF3222A7-20FA-11D4-ABC1-00D0B71D6ABB}

PDFForms.xml Spelling Checker;{224F7DEA-B7C1-11D3-AB40-00902712A5C9};PLSSpeller.cab

CBP-303

OIG Justification and Approval for Procurement Action November 21, 2017 DApanavage Office of Management OM Acquisitions Division 1.0 OIG Justification and Approval for Procurement Action Section 4 - Authority Cited Section 4 - Authority Cited The authority permitting A) Other Than Full Open Competition, B) Limited Sources, or C) Exception to Fair Opportunity is indicated below:

A) Open Market Acquisition (FAR Subpart 6.3) - Other than Full and Open Competition B) Federal Supply Schedules (FAR Subpart 8.4) - Limited Sources C) Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite Quantity (FAR Subpart 16.5) - Exception to Fair Opportunity Section 5 - Reason for Authority Cited Section 5 - Reason for Authority Cited Section 6 - Actions Taken to Increase Competition Section 7 - Determination of Fair and Reasonable Pricing Section 8 - Market Survey Section 9 - Other Factors Supporting the Use of Other than Full and Open Competition Section 10 - Interested Sources Section 11 - Proposed Actions the Agency May Take to Remove or Overcome Any Barriers to Competition Before Any Subsequent Acquisition for the Required Supplies or Services Section 12 - Additional Space Section 13 - Certification and Approvals In accordance with the authority(ies) indicated in Section 4 of this document and agency procedures, all justification documents must follow the approval process stated below.

The undersigned hereby certifies that the information provided herein to support this justification is complete and accurate to the best of his or her knowledge and belief.

CurrentPage:
PageCount:
PrintForm:
SaveForm:
ResetForm:
Office: Investigations
ProjectTitle: Magnet Axiom Renewal
otherthanfull:
exceptiontofair:
limitedsource:
TextField2: The OIG is purchasing maintenance and support of owned Magnet Axiom licenses.
IDNumber: REQCIO-20-00-003
ProcurementHistory: The OIG previously had a contract for software and support of Magnet Internet Evidence Finder (HSIGAQ-15-P-00052). This contract expired after a lapse in funding for the upgrade from IEF to Axiom when funding was placed on an incorrect purchase order.
EstimatedDollarValue:
DateField1: 2019-11-15
DateField2: 2020-11-14
TextField6: 2
TextField6: Jaspreet Matta
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox2: 0
CheckBox3: 0
CheckBox4: 0
CheckBox5: 0
TextField3:
CheckBox6: 0
CheckBox7: 0
CheckBox8: 0
CheckBox9: 0
CheckBox10: 0
CheckBox11: 0
CheckBox12: 0
CheckBox13: 0
CheckBox14: 0
CheckBox15: 0
Rationale: There are no resellers, agents, dealers, or distributors of this product. This product is highly specialized to support investigative casework. It is recognized as the industry standard.
Efforts: This is a non-competitive acquisition. This product can only be purchased from Magnet Forensics. Magnet's sole source letter is attached. J&A will be posted on SAM.gov.
determination: Price will be determined fair and reasonable based on market research, established pricing by the vendor, historical data and comparison to similar services.
marketresearch: The OIG has utilized Magnet AXIOM software for several years. This product is highly specialized and supports investigative casework. It is recognized as the industry standard. Market research confirmed that there are no resellers of this product and that AXIOM does not source it out to third parties for resale.
otherfactors: NA
interestedsources_1: Magnet Forensics, 2250 Corporate Park Drive, Suite 230, Herndon, VA 20171 - (844) 638 7884
proposed_actions: Before any subsequent acquisition for a similar requirement is initiated in the future, market research will be conducted again to determine if there are alternatives to this software that would be appropriate for the OIG environment.
TextField4:
Approved_date_1:
POSignature:
TextField5: Dan Petrowski
Approved_date_2:
COSignature:
Approved_date_3:
ADSupervisorsignature:
TextField7: Nieema Bath

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .