Attachment_B_Past_Performance_Additional_Source_Questionnaire_11-Feb-2019.pdf

Past Performance Additional Source Questionnaire

Name of Contracting Entity:

Contract No.:

Contract Type:

Contract Value (i.e., total estimated cost

(TEC)):1

Contract Period of performance:

Point of Contact (i.e., Name, Telephone No., and Email address):

Contracting Officer:

Technical Officer (i.e., Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or Activity Manager):

Contractor:

Information Provided in Response to Request for Proposal (RFP) No.:

A common five level assessment rating system, ranging from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional, is used to evaluate a contractor’s performance. As per Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 42.1503(h)(4), Table 42.1, below please find the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation rating definitions:

RATING DEFINITIONS

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

1 If subcontract, please provide the subcontract value.

FAR 15.305(a)(2)(ii) Additional Past Performance Request Governmentwide Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) Rating System

Please provide your feedback of the aforementioned contract number utilizing the PPIRS assessment elements below:

AREA RATED RATING

Quality of Product or Service:

Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, quality of software product and development, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).

Schedule:

Assess the contractor’s timeliness against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or effect the schedule variance).

Cost Control:2 Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost, including reporting and analyzing variances.

Business Relations:

Assess the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts, and whether the contractor met small business, small disadvantaged business, small business HUBZone, veteran-owned small business, service disabled veteran-owned small business, and women-owned small business participation and subcontracting goals.

Management of Key Personnel:

Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing – when necessary – key personnel.

2 As per FAR 42.1503(b)(2), not applicable for firm-fixed-price or fixed-price with economic price adjustment arrangements.

FAR 15.305(a)(2)(ii) Additional Past Performance Request Governmentwide Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) Rating System

Please feel free to provide more detailed comments, if any, regarding the rating provided above:

ASSESSING OFFICIAL COMMENTS

Quality of Product or Service:

Schedule:

Cost Control:

Business Relations:

Management of Key Personnel: