7.10_JA_Redaction_N0010424CDA28_Redacted.pdf

PDF 467 KB Posted

Attached to
CONTROL ELEC ASSY Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N0010424CDA28
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command

About this file

This document is a Justification and Approval (J&A) for Other Than Full and Open Competition for the procurement of a Control Elec Assy under Contract Number N0010424CDA28.

The J&A cites 10 USC 3204(a)(1) as the statutory authority, indicating that only one or a limited number of responsible sources can satisfy the agency's requirements. The rationale provided is that the Government does not have the necessary technical data or data rights to permit open competition, and the item can only be acquired from the original equipment manufacturer (OEM). Market research confirmed there are no known distributors or alternate sources for this item. The contracting officer will perform cost/pricing analysis to determine fair and reasonable pricing prior to contract award. Future requirements will be advertised on the government-wide point of entry to promote competition, and the Government will consider any new potential sources that emerge. The J&A was approved in accordance with FAR 6.304.

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

4. Statutory Authority Permitting Other Than Full & Open Competition

5. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Authority

6. Description of Efforts Made To Solicit Offers From as Many Offerors as Practicable

7. Determination of Fair And Reasonable Cost

Line of Accounting

This J&A is based upon the authority of 10 USC 3204(A) (1), only one or a limited number of responsible sources will satisfy agency requirements, as implemented by FAR 6.302-1

A/RMC 3

Acquire, for the second or subsequent time, directly from the actual manufacturer.

A/RMSC B

This part must be acquired from/repaired by a source(s) specified on a source control or selected item drawing as defined by the current version of DoD-STD-100. Suitable technical data, Government data rights, or manufacturing/repair knowledge are not available to permit acquisition from/repair by other sources, nor qualification testing of another part, nor use of a second source part in the intended application. Although, by DoD-STD-100 definition, altered and selected items shall have an adequate technical data package, data review discloses that required data or data rights are not in Government possession and cannot be economically obtained. If one source is available, A/RMCs 3, 4, or 5 are valid. If at least two sources exist, A/RMCs 1 or 2 are valid.

This acquisition will be solicited to

Based on the market research performed by the technical advocate, it is concluded that the only source of procurement is It has been deemed uneconomical to pursue the acquisition of the data because the data and it's content are not available. The Government does not own the data, or the rights to the data needed to openly compete this procurement requirement. Only the source listed above, who is the OEM, maintains the design and manufacturing standards via design drawings, manufacture procedures, and quality assurance procedures. There are no authorized substitutes of this item as this is the only item known to meet performance and compatibility requirements within the higher assembly. Furthermore, there is no data to support an open and full competition. The item has to be tested within the upper assembly and qualify within approved testing specifications procedures, embedded coding procedures, design protocols, and internal QA requirements. The Government does not have the data/or is not authorized to use the data, to approve alternate sources.

15 MAR 2019 Class Waiver of the Requirement to Post a Request for Information or Sources Sought Notice applies to this requirement

The proposed contract action was synopsized on the government-wide point of entry on 02/08/2024 and as a result No sources expressed an interest in the synopsis.

Market research was conducted in accordance with far part 10. The results of the market research conducted (or the reason(s) market research was not conducted) are as follows

A technical review, which consisted of searching several Government databases including ITIMP, FLIS and ERP, has been completed on this item. Search criteria included Part Number, Design Control Activity, Cage Code, NSN, Nomenclature, AMC/AMSC, AAC, Criticality Coding, recorded approved sourced of supply, historical sources of supply and past contracts. Based on this market research the contracting officer has determined that the only known procurement source is

If a company other than the one listed believes they have a compatible product, they can submit the item to the Engineering Program Office, to include research and development, drawings and test specifications. The program office may test and evaluate the item at the company’s expense, when appropriate. Upon qualification, the approved company will be able to participate in current or future solicitations. ITIMP- Reviewed award history and other potential sources of supply, AMC/AMSC code, part number, CAGE code. ERP- Search criteria included part number, design control activity, Cage code, NSN, Nomenclature, AMC/AMSC, AAC, Criticality Coding which all matched with ITIMP. Market research did not reveal, or identify any known distributors.

The contracting officer determines that the anticipated cost to the Government of the supplies covered by this J&A will be fair and reasonable. The contracting officer will perform cost and/or pricing analysis to determine prices as fair and reasonable prior to the contract award.

5/14/24, 7 49 AM WorkflowPro https //my navsup navy mil/apps/ops$workflow pro j and a edit?p id 13335 2/4

8. Actions to Remove Barriers to Future Competition

9. Any Other Facts Supporting Other Than Full & Open Competition

History

To promote competition, NAVSUP WSS will continue to encourage vendors with the expertise to manufacture/repair the subject item to submit a complete technical data package for review and source approval by the appropriate engineering source approval authority per the (WSS) guidelines. Also, future requirements will be advertised on the government-wide point of entry. For reasons set forth in Paragraph (5 & 6), NAVSUP WSS has no plans at this time to compete future contracts for the subject item covered by this document. If another potential manufacturing source emerges, NAVSUP WSS will assess whether competition for future requirements is feasible. Also, future requirements will be advertised on the government-wide point of entry.

Previous J&A Previous J&A Available in Workflow Pro

N/A

Created By Work Function Reprocurement Technician

Created Date 07/24/2023

24-JUL-23

I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this J&A are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief

Requirements Cognizance Signature

Work Function Planner Requirements Cognizance Signature Date

07/24/2023

I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this J&A are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief

Technical Cognizance Signature

Work Function Reprocurement Technician

Technical Cognizance Signature Date

07/24/2023

I certify that this J&A is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief

Contracting Officer Certification Signature

Work Function Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer Certification Signature Date

01/31/2024

I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this J&A are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief

Competition Advocacy Review And Concurrence Signature

Work Function Competition Advocate

Competition Advocacy Review And Concurrence Signature Date

02/28/2024

I certify that this J&A is legally sufficient to the best of my knowledge and belief

Legal Sufficiency Review Signature

Work Function Attorney Legal Sufficiency Review Signature Date

02/28/2024

I certify that this J&A is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief https //my navsup navy mil/apps/ops$workflow pro j and a edit?p id 13335 3/4

Approval Required By Far 6.304 Signature

Work Function Competition Advocate

Approval Required By Far 6.304 Signature Date

03/04/2024 https //my navsup navy mil/apps/ops$workflow pro j and a edit?p id 13335 4/4

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .