QnA_3.5.18.pdf

PDF 73 KB Posted

Attached to
CO FLAP CHA306(1), Cottonwood Pass East Side
Solicitation number
6982AF18B000003
Issued by

About this file

Q&A 3/5/2018

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid_Tabs.pdf PDF
CO_FLAP_CHA306(1)_Bid_Opening_Summary.pdf PDF
QnA_Addendum_3.6.18.pdf PDF
QnA_3.6.18.pdf PDF
A003.pdf PDF
A002.pdf PDF
A001.pdf PDF
FINAL_Geotechnical_Report_Cottonwood_Pass_East_CO_FLAP_CHA306(1).pdf PDF
CO_FLAP_CHA306-1_FinalPlans.pdf PDF
6982AF18B000003.pdf PDF
CO_FH_59-3(1)_As-Builts.pdf PDF
CO_FLAP_CHA_306(1)_Pavements_Report_Signed.pdf PDF
CO_FLAP_CHA306-1_FinalXS.pdf PDF
UtilitySketches.pdf PDF
CO_FLAP_CHA306-1_70_PLANS.pdf PDF
CO_FLAPCHA306-1_70_SCR.pdf PDF
CO_FLAP_CHA306-1_70_CROSS-SECTIONS.pdf PDF
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Questions and Answers during Advertisement for

CO FLAP CHA306(1), Cottonwood Pass East Side

March 5, 2018

Questions Answers

1 We can’t find a cross section for the culvert at 3769+00. Also, the plans call for a culvert 3775+10 and the cross sections call for a culvert at 3775+90 that is not shown on the plans. We are still looking through them all but wanted to point out what we found so far.

Culvert at 3769+00

The culvert at 3769+00 was identified for replacement late in design, there is no survey or mapping at this location, so there is no cross section. The contractor will need to prepare plots per 15215-3000 Survey and Staking, Drainage Structure and submit to the CO for approval.

Culvert at 3775+10

The culvert is located at 3775+10. The cross-section label is incorrect and has now been fixed.

2 Is item 62303-1000 is lump sum. Is that correct?

The Pay Item 62303-1000 Special Labor, Hired Technical Services has been revised to be by Hour for Schedules A, B, and C.

3 It looks like sheet A-4 was a cut and paste from Cottonwood West.

Probably not a big deal but wanted to point it out.

The points shown are correct. However, survey points at the summit were inadvertently left off. Sheet A4 has been revised.

File details come from the government source that posted it.