Customer Satisfaction Survey 697DCK-19-R-00213 Huntsville.docx

DOCX document 13 KB Posted

Attached to
SIR- Landscaping and Ground Keeping Service at the Federal Aviation Administration, HSV SSC/ ATCT
Solicitation number
697DCK-19-R-00213
Issued by

About this file

Customer Satisfaction Survey 697DCK-19-R-00213 Huntsville (docx)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SPECIFICATIONS FOR GROUND MAINTENANCE HSV Revised 03-28-19.doc DOC document
697DCK-19-R-00213 (final).final —
697DCK-19-R-00213 Business Size Amendment.pdf PDF
Customer Satisfaction Survey 697DCK-19-R-00213 Huntsville.docx DOCX document
Wage determination.pdf PDF
697DCK-19-R-00213 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Customer Satisfaction Survey 697DCK-19-R-00213 Huntsville.docx DOCX document
697DCK-19-R-00213 (final).final —
Wage determination.pdf PDF
697DCK-19-R-00213 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
SPECIFICATIONS FOR GROUND MAINTENANCE HSV Revised 03-28-19.doc DOC document
697DCK-19-R-00213 Business Size Amendment.pdf PDF
Customer Satisfaction Survey 697DCK-19-R-00213 Huntsville.docx DOCX document
697DCK-19-R-00213 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Wage determination.pdf PDF
SPECIFICATIONS FOR GROUND MAINTENANCE HSV Revised 03-28-19.doc DOC document
697DCK-19-R-00213 Business Size Amendment.pdf PDF
Wage determination.pdf PDF
Customer Satisfaction Survey 697DCK-19-R-00213 Huntsville.docx DOCX document
697DCK-19-R-00213 Business Size Amendment.pdf PDF
SPECIFICATIONS FOR GROUND MAINTENANCE HSV Revised 03-28-19.doc DOC document
697DCK-19-R-00213 (final).final —
SPECIFICATIONS FOR GROUND MAINTENANCE HSV Revised 03-28-19.doc DOC document
Wage determination.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFO # 697DCK-19-R-00213: Landscaping and Grounds Keeping Service in Huntsville, AL HSV SSC/ ATCT Facilities

Customer Satisfaction Survey Date: 4-3-19

X- Clean Corp. is submitting a proposal on a Federal Aviation Administration solicitation and provided your name as a customer reference. Part of our evaluations process requires information on the firm’s past performance. Your input is important to us. Please reply by Tuesday, September 4th at 09:00am Eastern for inclusion of this evaluation. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

Please rate your current level of satisfaction with the overall service performance of this contractor:

______Excellent (5) ______Very Good (4) ______Good (3) ______Needs Improvement (2)

______Unacceptable (1)

Comments: ______________________________________________________________________

How quickly does this contractor respond to your needs, requests, or complaints?

______Excellent (5) ______Very Good (4) ______Good (3) ______Needs Improvement (2)

______Unacceptable (1)

Comments: ______________________________________________________________________

How would you rate the problem solving capabilities and follow-up of this contractor’s Operations Management?

______Excellent (5) ______Very Good (4) ______Good (3) ______Needs Improvement (2)

______Unacceptable (1)

Comments: ______________________________________________________________________

Would you be pleased to see this contractor awarded another contract at your facility for the same service?

_______Yes _______ No

Comments: ______________________________________________________________________

Organization Name: ________________________________________ Date: __________________

Contact: _________________________________________________

Phone #: ________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it.