Amendment 0004 - Extension of Closing Date, Responses to Vendor Inquiries and Revised SOW.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO.

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required.)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(x) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

1 1

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

NO. 0004

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10/04/2018

AAQ-721 LOGISTICS CENTER ACQ

FAA AERONAUTICAL CENTER

PO BOX 25082

MPB ROOM 312

AAQ0721-AFN

OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73125

AAQ-721 LOGISTICS CENTER ACQ

FAA AERONAUTICAL CENTER

PO BOX 25082

MPB ROOM 312

AAQ721-AFN

OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73125

x x

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

6973GH-18-R-00241

copies to the issuing office.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08/30/2018

(x)

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. CONTRACT AUTHORITY 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

John A. Hawk

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

First: The purpose of this amendment is to extend the closing date of solicitation 6973GH-18-F-00241 to 5:00 p.m. Central Time (Oklahoma Time)on October 10, 2018. Therefore, the closing date has been revised from September 12, 2018 to October 10, 2018.

Second: Responses to vendor inquiries are attached in this amendment and a revised Statement of Work (SOW). Questions are marked with "Q" and the government's responses are marked with "A." This is in correction to the previous Amendment.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 ______ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment number. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

is extended, 1X

X

Vendor Questions and FAA Responses for Gull Island Tech Refresh

SIR 6973GH-18-R-00241

Vendor Questions and FAA responses for Gull Island Tech refresh, SIR 6973GH-18-R-00241

Q1. SOW 3.1.2 states that the Contractor will “not perform any NRE or develop new hardware or software to be utilized in this technology upgrade” and that “no NRE or development funds will be provided under this SOW (SOW 5.1.5). However, items a-c below will all require significant investment to meet the requirements and HW / SW development. Can the government provide additional clarification and define the specific assumptions the offerors should use when preparing Section B pricing?

a. The Radar Processor Physical Requirements in Section 3.3.10 are more constraining than the actual Radar MDP Processor in operation. Reducing the height from 4U to 2U and the depth from 21” to less than 20” will require significant NRE by the Contractor to re-design the MDP Radar Processor. Recommend updating 3.3.10 Physical Requirements to that of the current MDP Radar Processor

b. There is a requirement under “Assessments” in 3.4.3 stating that the contractor shall reduce the DTM-011 footprint by consolidating all equipment into RVSS Environmental Equipment Enclosure during the system upgrade installation. This redesign would then require new drawings, analyses (structural, power, and thermal) as noted in Sections 3.1.5 and 3.1.6, which will necessitate NRE to conduct this effort.

c. SOW Section 3.7 Security references DHS Sensitive Systems Policy Directive 4300A. If DHS Cybersecurity standards are more stringent than current MDP system requirements, there will be significant labor associated with ATO accreditation under a new standard.

A1. 1a. SE recommends payment for NRE for change of these physical specs. This is wrapped into the effort to consolidate the radar system components into (1) rack shelter cabinet. Currently it is distributed among two (2).

SE R&A: Please extract and submit drawings from the DTM-16 drawing package such that industry has context and can understand the scope of work to consolidate the equipment into one (1) rack shelter cabinet. This needs submitted to FAA to include as a link in the RFP revision.

1b. SE recommends payment for NRE for engineering to reduce footprint. Contractor should provide drawings for ISEA to update product baseline. Same as item 1a.

1c. SE recommends that the contractor must provide the processor to be integrated per most current DHS Cybersecurity standards. This may require some configuration of the processor which could require NRE.

Q2. Site Survey is required for technology refresh of the Radar components, which will be conducted post award. Can the government provide additional clarification and define the specific assumptions the offerors should use when preparing Section B pricing? Should the Offeror assume all components of the MDP Radar System will need to be replaced when preparing the Base Year Technology refresh list and Section B pricing?

A2. SE recommends allowing for a site survey. PMOD confirms second part of question - MDP Radar System shall be replaced as required.

Q3. SOW Section 4.0 Schedule/Milestones is not up-to-date. Can the government provide updated schedule dates based on latest Request for Offer timeline?

A3. Revised SOW is added as an attachment, in specific, section 4.1.4 has been updated to 11/13/18 and section 4.1.5 has been updated to 12/14/18.

Q4. Section F Delivery for CLIN 00001 Base Year Equipment is NLT 10-30-2018. This date is reliant on conducting a Site Survey, which will occur after award. What is the government’s expected date of equipment delivery?

A4. Similar to response in Q3, revised SOW is added as an attachment, in specific, section 4.1.4 has been updated to 11/13/18 and section 4.1.5 has been updated to 12/14/18.

Q5. Can the government provide the reference document “DTM-11 VRCH 0901 Remote Radar System Installation” noted under Section 2.0 of the SOW?

A5. The SOW has been revised and document DTM-11 VRCH 0901 is added as an attachment.

Q6. What is the duration for the 24/7 on-call technical support (SOW Section 3.10.5)? Should the Offeror assume three years?

A6. This is correct and is currently embedded in the writing of the SOW as contract Period of Performance (POP).

Q7. Is an extension possible? Typically, for a solicitation of this magnitude at least 30 days is given. 13 days over a holiday weekend doesn’t seem reasonable with what is being requested. Thank you in advance for your consideration.

A7. Several extensions have been added through Amendments.

Q8. The Government Documents DTM-11 VRCH 0901 and MIL HKBK 61A* cannot be found at the link provided in the SOW. Can you please provide these documents or correct the link and submit a revised SOW?

A8. The SOW has been revised and the link is fixed for MIL HDBK 61A*. Also, DTM-11 VRCH 0901 is added to the document as an attachment.

Q9. As far as I can see SOW states the following:

Probability of Detection 75% (T) 95% (O) – Please define the range and target size requirement Availability 90% (T) 95%(O) - OK

SToIs from Jetski up to Container ships – Please define the range requirement for each size of target Sea State 3 (T) 4 (O) OK

Can you confirm the following:

a. What is the weight limit/load limit of the existing pole the new radar will be mounted on?

A9. Target Size: 80" x 24" x 24" per size of STOIs as defined in MDP P-FRD. Range: To the International Border, already defined in the SOW in section 3.3.3.3.

Q10. The page marked Page 47 of the SIR/Provision 3.2.4 makes reference to a document identified as DCN: USBP08- MDP-000-000049. Can you please provide this document, or indicate where it can be found?

A10. The SOW has been revised and the link is fixed for MIL HDBK 61A*. Also, DTM-11 VRCH 0901 is added to the

Q11. The link on Page A-2 of the SOW does not work for me. Are you able to: (1) fix the link or (2) send me an updated link or the referenced document(s) itself?

A11. The SOW has been revised and the link is fixed for MIL HDBK 61A*. Also, DTM-11 VRCH 0901 is added to the

Q12. Page A-2 of the SOW also lists a government document entitled: DTM-11 VRCH 0901 Remote Radar System Installation. Can you please provide this document to me?

A12. The SOW has been revised and the link is fixed for MIL HDBK 61A*. Also, DTM-11 VRCH 0901 is added to the

Q13. Are you able to provide any additional information on the radar equipment and components that are being considered for refresh. For example, Description, Manufacturer, Model Numbers, etc.?

A13. This information is For Official Use Only and cannot be shared at this time.

Q14. Are you able to provide any additional information regarding the Gull Island site and the installation itself, along with photos of the equipment and components in their installed configuration?

A14. Photos are not available for this.

Q15. Will the Government provide the listed Requirements Document (DCN: USBP08-MDP-000-000049 which was not provided in the solicitation files?

A15. The SOW has been revised and the link is fixed for MIL HDBK 61A*. Also, DTM-11 VRCH 0901 is added to the document as an attachment. USBP08-MDP-000-000049 has been removed from the document.

Q16. Will the Government provide the existing system configuration information including key component make/model numbers, as-built drawings, and any other system documentation?

A16. The government will not post this information.

Q17. Will the Government provide the current DTM-011 footprint information and site drawings?

A17. No, this information should not be needed for a proposal.

Q18. The offeror is required to produce a bill of Materials (BOM) for the radar processor. Note 1 states: “The following will be either upgraded or replaced as determined appropriate at the time of the Site Survey.

a. Is the offeror to provide a price in CLIN 0001, Base Year Equipment for the replacement of the Radar System which meets the required performance specifications for LPTA evaluation? Or should the offeror provide only the price to complete the survey, prepare the survey report, Integration Plan, BOM listing, and detailed equipment specifications?

A18. Response to CLIN 0001 should be all materials needed to complete this project.

Q19. Will the Government update the required system component delivery dates since the required August 13, 2018 delivery date has passed?

A19. The SOW has been revised with new dates.

Q20. Will the Government update the required DTM-011 installation/integration date since the required September 14, 2018 delivery date has passed?

A20. The SOW has been revised with new dates.

Q21. Provide engineering analyses to the both the CO and COR for any aspects of the proposed solution that do not constitute a one to one change. Analyses may include, but not be limited to, structural analysis, power analysis, and thermal analysis. Is the contractor responsible for performing structural, grounding, etc. analysis on the tower and building?

A21. Yes.

Q22. Provide updates to both the CO and COR of the product baseline (drawings, manuals, software lists, etc.) to support the development of an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) that will be managed by the MDP In-Service Engineering Activity (ISEA), which is performed by the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD). In what format will the existing drawings be provided?

A22. PDF, but arrangements can be made to provide Word and CAD files where available and if needed.

Q23. What is the current power source for the site and equipment?

A23. Grid Power.

Q24. Provide appropriately trained personnel on-site with the MDP ISEA to support the installation/integration efforts on the DTM-011 tower, including Certified Climber/Installation Technician and Ground Safety personnel. Can detailed photos of the tower be provided so a more detailed understanding of the required climbing and lifting can be ascertained?

A24. No.

Q25. Provide training materials and conduct training to operator and maintenance personnel

A25. Not stated as a question.

Q26. Reduce the DTM-011 footprint by consolidating all equipment into RVSS Environmental Equipment Enclosure during the system upgrade installation. Does this enclosure already exist?

A26. Yes.

Revised Statement of Work (SOW) for Gull Island Tech Refresh

SIR 6973GH-18-R-00241

Statement of Work (SOW)

18 June 2018

AML-4000

Maritime Detection Project (MDP) Detroit Radar System Technology Refresh

Prepared by

Federal Aviation Administration Logistic Center (FAA) Oklahoma City, OK

Page A-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ........................................................................... A-2

1.1 Scope ............................................................................................................................ A-2

1.2 Objective ...................................................................................................................... A-2

2.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ......................................................................................... A-2

3.0 REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................................... A-22

3.1 General Requirements ................................................................................................ A-22

3.2 Technical Requirements ............................................................................................. A-33

3.3 Performance Requirements ........................................................................................ A-33

3.4 Assessments ................................................................................................................. A-6

3.5 Hardware Obsolescence ............................................................................................. A-66

3.6 Software/Firmware ..................................................................................................... A-66

3.7 Security......................................................................................................................... A-7

3.8 Installation/Integration ............................................................................................... A-77

3.9 Testing ........................................................................................................................ A-77

3.10 Operational and Maintenance Support ......................................................................... A-8

3.11 Sparing ....................................................................................................................... A-88

4.0 SCHEDULES/MILESTONES ...................................................................................... A-88

5.0 DELIVERABLES .......................................................................................................... A-88

6.0 TRAVEL ........................................................................................................................ A-99

7.0 TRANSMITTAL/DELIVERY/ACCESSIBILITY........................................................ A-99

8.0 ACCEPTANCE AND PROJECT CLOSURE............................................................... A-99

APPENDIX A - ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................... A-100

Page A-2

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

This Statement of Work (SOW) describes the need for the award of a contract for the Maritime Detection Project (MDP) Detroit Radar Processor Technology Refresh at DTM-011, located at Gull Island on Lake St. Clair outside Detroit, MI. This technology refresh at this tower will ensure continual operation of the MDP Detroit system. The purpose of the MDP Technology Refresh is to upgrade or replace the existing radar and processor components of the System at DTM-011.

1.1 Scope

The Contractor will furnish all professional, technical and support labor, travel, materials, supplies, management services, data, facilities, and transportation required to successfully complete the tasks specified in section 3.0 and meet the objectives and deliverables as identified in this SOW to minimize system or component downtime, maximize resources, and to complete the project in an efficient and cost effective manner.

1.2 Objective

The objective of this document is to define the project requirements, deliverables, schedule/ milestones that will be expected of the Contractor upon award to complete the MDP Detroit Radar System Technology Refresh at DTM-011.

2.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

If any referenced document conflict with the contents of this SOW, this SOW, upon final approval, including waivers and deviations, is the superseding authority.

Government Documents

DTM-11 VRCH 0901

MIL HDBK 61A*

Remote Radar System Installation

Configuration Management Guidance

Refer to latest revision of all drawings and documents.

*These documents may be found at:

http://acqnotes.com/Attachments/MIL-HDBK-61A%20(SE)Configuration%20Management%20Guidance.pdf

3.0 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 General Requirements

The Contractor shall:

3.1.1 Use only Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) hardware and software.

3.1.2 Not perform any non-recurring engineering (NRE) or develop new hardware or software to be utilized in this technology upgrade.

3.1.3 Provide the services herein to include all equipment, materials, facilities, labor, tools, and incidental items necessary.

http://acqnotes.com/Attachments/MIL-HDBK-61A%20(SE)Configuration%20Management%20Guidance.pdf

Page A-3

3.1.4 Procure specialized services to accomplish all tasks outlined in this SOW to include obtaining transportation to and from the island facility.

3.1.5 Facilitate acquisition of all engineering analyses, certifications, and stamps required for integrating the new hardware. All drawing and analysis submittals governed by building codes and standards must be reviewed, certified, and sealed (stamped, signed, and dated) by a registered Professional Engineer (PE) in the appropriate discipline who is licensed in the jurisdiction where the proposed work will be performed.

3.1.6 Provide engineering analyses to the both the CO and COR for any aspects of the proposed solution that do not constitute a one to one change. Analyses may include, but not be limited to, structural analysis, power analysis, and thermal analysis.

3.1.7 Adhere to existing CBP OA accepted Configuration Management processes in accordance with MIL HDBK61A

3.1.8 Provide updates to both the CO and COR of the product baseline (drawings, manuals, software lists, etc.) to support the development of an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) that will be managed by the MDP In-Service Engineering Activity (ISEA), which is performed by the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD).

3.1.9 Provide all necessary tools and special equipment if/as necessary to accomplish the tasks identified in this SOW as well as any necessary training to Contractor personnel.

3.2 Technical Requirements

The Radar System currently utilized in the MDP Detroit system is housed on top of an 80-foot monopole utilized for CBP surveillance at the DTM-011, located at Gull Island on Lake St. Clair outside Detroit, MI. MDP Detroit will continue to use existing communication backhaul architecture in place throughout the sector.

The Furuno FAR-2157 Scanner Unit and all corresponding components will either be upgraded or replaced as determined appropriate at the time of the Site Survey. The corresponding components include:

• The XN-5A 10ft Open Array Furuno Radar Antenna Automatic Identification System (AIS) Receiver and Very High Frequency (VHF) and Global Positioning System (GPS) antennas

• Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)

• Power Distribution Unit

• Line Conditioner

3.3 Performance Requirements

3.3.1 Key Performance Parameters

3.3.1.1 Probability of Detection shall be 75% (T) and 95% (O)

3.3.1.2 Operational Availability shall be 90% (T) and 95% (O)

3.3.2 Operational Requirements

The Radar System shall provide:

Page A-4

3.3.2.1 Automatic surveillance of maritime traffic across the MDP Detroit Area of Interest (AoI) during both day and night operations

3.3.2.2 Detect and track all Surface Targets of Interest (SToIs) across the AoI Note 1: If the radar detects a target and continues to receive hits on the path of the detected target, however, misses the target on one sweep the track can still be continuous if the radar is able to receive a hit.

Note 2: Once the track data has been prioritized and displayed on the COP, the operator will use the information (to include existing full motion video) to identify and classify the threat level and coordinate the appropriate response.

3.3.3 Effectiveness Requirements

The Radar System shall (refer to Figure 1):

3.3.3.1 Detect when a SToI crossed the International Boundary between the United States and

Canada.

3.3.3.2 Detect SToIs ranging from stationary to fifty (50) nautical miles per hour.

3.3.3.3 Detect SToIs that range from personal conveyances (including, but not limited to, fast boats, pontoon boats, and jet skis) up to and including large container ships; minimum size shall be 80”x24”x24” (LWH) along the United States coastline extending out to the International Boundary.

Note: It is understood that this requirement may be achieved in whole or in part by complimentary camera/full motion video technology.

3.3.3.4 Detect SToIs in, up to and including, Sea State 3 (T)/Sea State 4 (O) and in maritime environments during rain and ice.

3.3.3.5 Continuously track detected SToIs as they move throughout the AoI.

Page A-5

Figure 1. Current Area of Responsibility

3.3.4 Operating System

3.3.4.1 The Radar System shall be interoperable with Windows 10.

3.3.5 External Interfaces

3.3.5.1 Open Application Programming Interface (API) as required for interface to the

SMS/JPSC2 Server (refer to SMS Web Services Interface Control Document as required)

3.3.5.2 Ethernet: One (1) 1000 Base-T

3.3.5.3 Serial: Two (2) RS-232, Two (2) RS-422

3.3.5.4 Input/Output: Two (2) USB 2.0, One (1) each VGA, DVI, and PS/2

3.3.6 External Interfaces

The Radar Processor shall provide the following minimum external interfaces:

3.3.6.1 Open Application Programming Interface (API) for communication between software components

3.3.6.2 Ethernet: One (1) 1000 Base-T

3.3.6.3 Serial: Two (2) RS-232, Two (2) RS-422

3.3.6.4 Input/Output: Two (2) USB 2.0, One (1) each VGA, DVI, and PS/2

3.3.7 Power Requirements

3.3.7.1 The Radar Processor shall operate at 120Vac, 60Hz (nominal).

3.3.7.2 The Radar Processor power consumption shall be a maximum of 200W.

3.3.8 Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF)

3.3.8.1 The Radar Processor shall have a MTBF of 50,000 hours.

3.3.9 Environmental Requirements

The Radar Processor shall meet or exceed the following environmental requirements:

3.3.9.1 Operating Temperature: 0 to 50°C

3.3.9.2 Non-Operating Temperature: -40 to +65°C

3.3.9.3 Humidity (non-condensing): 5 to 95%

3.3.9.4 Input/Output: Two (2) USB 2.0, One (1) each VGA, DVI, and PS/2 Note: The Radar System shall operate and survive in all climatic conditions found in the AoI.

3.3.10 Physical Requirements

The Radar Processor shall meet the following physical requirements:

3.3.10.1 Weight: 45 pounds (uncrated)

3.3.10.2 Height: 2RU (as defined by EIA-310)

3.3.10.3 Width: Standard EIA-310 enclosure

Page A-6

3.3.10.4 Depth: Less than or equal to 20 inches

3.3.11 Heat Dissipation

3.3.11.1 The Radar Processor heat dissipation shall not exceed 650 BTU/hr.

3.4 Assessments

The Contractor shall:

3.4.1 Assess the condition of the system architecture by reviewing the product baseline

3.4.2 Conduct a site survey

3.4.3 Reduce the DTM-011 footprint by consolidating all equipment into RVSS Environmental

Equipment Enclosure during the system upgrade installation

3.4.4 Work with the FAA Contracting Officer Representative (COR) for approval of new hardware and software not listed on the CBP Technical Reference Model (TRM) list and or the addition of such hardware and software to the TRM using USBP Technology Insertion process

3.4.5 Produce an Integration Plan detailing the components, cables, and software that will be replaced, the new components, cables, and software that will be installed, and the plan for consolidating equipment cabinets

3.4.6 Produce a project task checklist

3.5 Hardware Obsolescence

The Contractor shall:

3.5.1 Overhaul, upgrade, and/or replace obsolete parts of the system as required and directed by the FAA Contracting Officer Representative (COR).

3.5.2 Produce a Bill of Materials (BOM) for the radar processor components.

Note 1: The following will either be upgraded or replaced as determined appropriate at the time of the Site Survey.

• The XN-5A 10ft Open Array Furuno Radar Antenna

• The Furuno FAR-2157 Scanner Unit

• Automatic Identification System (AIS) Receiver and Very High Frequency (VHF) and

Global Positioning System (GPS) antennas

• Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)

• Power Distribution Unit

3.6 Line Conditioner Software/Firmware

The Contractor shall:

3.6.1 Ensure all software (including firmware) is compatible with the Microsoft Windows Server

2012 R2 and Microsoft Windows 10, as applicable

3.6.2 Provide the software capability to add an exception for Embedded Linux or Windows on all endpoint devices including security patches

3.6.3 Provide a list of any new software including version numbers to the FAA

Page A-7

3.6.4 Provide software with the capability for capturing logs including but not limited to audit logs, system events, and syslog messages

3.7 Security

The Contractor shall:

3.7.1 Ensure all software (including firmware) is in compliance with Department of Homeland

Security (DHS) and CBP cybersecurity standards and policies in accordance with DHS Sensitive Systems Policy Directive 4300A

3.7.2 Contractor shall provide authentication capability to support LDAP, RADIUS, or

TACACS

3.8 Installation/Integration

The Contractor shall:

3.8.1 Provide appropriately trained personnel on-site with the MDP ISEA to support the installation/integration efforts on the DTM-011 tower, including Certified Climber/Installation Technician and Ground Safety personnel

3.8.2 Support the MDP ISEA revisions to existing and/or preliminary drawings for the new radar processor

3.9 Testing

The Contractor shall:

3.9.1 Test system processing and control at Contractor facilities using Contractor test procedures and provide a signed Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) document prior to delivery to the

FAA

3.9.2 Support the MDP ISEA revisions to existing test plans/procedures for testing of the new radar processor

3.9.3 Support the MDP ISEA System Operation and Verification Test (SOVT) of the new radar processor at the SMS/JPSC2 Test Bed located at NAWCAD, Building 8222, Webster Field, Saint Inigoes, MD prior to integration at DTM-011 located at Gull Island on Lake St. Clair outside Detroit, MI.

3.9.4 Support the MDP ISEA development of a SOVT report to show successful completion of test bed testing prior to integration at DTM-011

3.9.5 Support the MDP ISEA development of a Test Readiness Review (TRR) Brief after installation and dry-run testing and prior to run-for-record testing

3.9.6 Support the MDP ISEA SOVT of the new radar system at DTM-011, including verification of maritime vessels tracking

3.9.7 Provide on-site and remote support for resolution of integration and interface issues during a thirty (30) day burn-in period after the successful completion of testing

3.9.8 Support the MDP ISEA delivery of a Final SOVT Report to include test results, test logs, conclusions, and recommendations

Page A-8

3.10 Operational and Maintenance Support

The Contractor shall:

3.10.1 Provide training materials and conduct training to operator and maintenance personnel

3.10.2 Provide maintenance documentation for all new components

3.10.3 Calibrate radar filters after integration and during system burn-in, as required

3.10.4 Provide operational and maintenance support of the system for up to three years.

3.10.5 Provide 24/7 on-call technical support

3.10.6 Identify and provide applicable security patches and software updates

3.11 Sparing

3.11.1 The Contractor shall provide sparing recommendations to FAA for long term sustainment

4.0 SCHEDULES/MILESTONES

The Contractor shall:

4.1.1 Prepare and submit the minutes of the Kick-Off Meeting documenting the Contractor’s plan forward and understanding of the project requirements

4.1.2 Develop and manage a project schedule to execute and complete the technology refresh requirements of this SOW and deliver the schedule to the Government NLT 10 working days after the Kick-Off Meeting

4.1.3 Consider the Great Lake region inclement weather in development of the schedule

4.1.4 Deliver system components to the NAWCAD JPSC2 Test Bed for SOVT NLT August 13,

4.1.5 Complete DTM-011 installation/integration NLT September 14, 2018

4.1.6 Produce a Project Closure Report

5.0 DELIVERABLES

The Contractor shall deliver the following:

5.1.1 Project schedule to the Government NLT 10 working days after the Kick-Off Meeting

5.1.2 Trip Reports NLT 10 working days after return from the trip(s)

5.1.3 Weekly Status and Monthly Progress Reports

5.1.4 Site Survey Report on conditions of the current radar system, replacement of the radar processing and control, and recommendations for consolidating cabinets and reducing overall footprint NLT 15 working days after completion of the site survey

5.1.5 Radar Processor Interface Control Document (Note: No NRE or developmental funds will be provided under this SOW)

5.1.6 Integration Plan for new equipment and consolidating cabinets

5.1.7 BOM for the proposed radar system replacement component(s)

5.1.8 Equipment specifications and data for the proposed replacement system components

Page A-9

5.1.9 Final As-Built drawings of equipment and components to include, but not limited to:

5.1.9.1.1 Radar System Arrangement drawing

5.1.9.1.2 Cable Interconnect Diagram, including equipment identification, interface connections between equipment, and cable numbers

5.1.10 Copies of all Contractor installed equipment Warranties and Guaranty information

5.1.11 User Guide and Training Manual

5.1.12 Project Closure Report and Project Task Checklist NLT 10 working days following completion of all project tasks

6.0 TRAVEL

6.1 The FAA COR will coordinate with the vendor travel dates/time for installations.

6.2 An MDP ISEA Certified Climber/Installation Technician, Ground Safety personnel, and Engineer will be on site during the installation/integration to verify installation in accordance with OSHA requirements and to perform Quality Control checks.

6.3 The contractor shall include travel requirement and a travel estimate for approval. The Contracting Officer will authorize travel at the time the delivery/task order is issued, and before travel costs can be charged as a direct contract cost.

Individuals shall separately identify all travel related expenses claimed for reimbursement, by trip and employee. The contractor shall submit proof/receipts of its actual purchase price for commercial transportation, lodging, rent car and any other items to be reimbursed at actual cost.

All travel expenses must be billed and paid in accordance with the Federal Travel Regulations (FTR) which can be found at https://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/104790.

7.0 TRANSMITTAL/DELIVERY/ACCESSIBILITY

7.1 Reports, Invoices, Meeting Minutes, Test Records, and Submittals shall be delivered to the FAA Contracting Officer and Contracting Officer electronically by email using .pdf, Word, Excel, or other standard Microsoft Office format.

7.2 Two (2) copies of the all Contractor drawings and documents shall be delivered to the FAA FAA Contracting Officer and Contracting Officer in both .pdf and AutoCAD (.dwg) file format on Compact Disc (CD).

8.0 ACCEPTANCE AND PROJECT CLOSURE

For the MDP Detroit Radar System Technology Refresh, all deliverables will be reviewed by the FAA for acceptance. The FAA will ensure the completeness of each stage of the project and that the scope of work has been met. Once a project phase is completed, the FAA will either sign off on the approval for the next phase to begin, or reply to the Contractor, in writing, advising what tasks are outstanding.

Once all project tasks have been completed, the project will enter the handoff/closure stage.

During this stage of the project, the Contractor will provide their Project Closure Report and https://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/104790

Page A-10

Project Task Checklist to the FAA. The acceptance of this documentation by the FAA shall acknowledge acceptance of all project deliverables and that the Contractor has met all assigned tasks.

The project closure shall follow a successful integration and system test as defined during the TRR as well as a complete transfer of all deliverables to the FAA.

Any discrepancies involving completion of project tasks or disagreement between the FAA and the Contractor will be referred to both organizations’ contracting offices for review, adjudication, and resolution.

APPENDIX A - ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

BOM Bill of Materials

CD Compact Disc COTS Commercial Off The Shelf DHS Department of Homeland Security ECP Engineering Change Proposal FAALC Federal Aviation Administration Logistics Center FAT Factory Acceptance Test FOUO For Official Use Only ISEA In-Service Engineering Activity JPSC2 Joint Perimeter Surveillance Command and Control LDAP Lightweight Directory Access Protocol MDP Maritime Detection Project NAWCAD Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division NRE Non-Recurring Engineering OA Office of Acquisition OIT Office of Information Technology PE Professional Engineer RADIUS Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service SOVT System Operation and Verification Test SOW Statement of Work TACACS Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System TRM Technical Reference Model TRR Test Readiness Review USBP U.S. Border Patrol

Page B-11

APPENDIX B

DTM-11 VRCH 0901

MIL HDBK 61A*

Remote Radar System Installation

Configuration Management Guidance

*MIL HSBK 61A may be found at the link below

DTM-011 VRCH 0901

- Remote Radar Sys In