693JJ921R000028 Question and NHTSA Response.pdf
PDF 143 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Judicial Outreach Liaison and Fellows Program
- Opportunity number
- 693JJ921R0000028
About this file
Question and NHTSA Response 693JJ921R000028
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx | DOCX document | |
| SFLLL_1_2-V1.2.pdf | ||
| SF424B-V1.1-1.pdf | ||
| SF424a.pdf | ||
| SF424.pdf | ||
| 49CFR29 Appendix C.PDF | ||
| 49CFR29 Appendix B.PDF | ||
| 49CFR29 Appendix A.PDF | ||
| 49CFR20 Appendix A.PDF | ||
| NOFO 693JJ921R000028 NLT 07152021 2PM ET.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP # 693JJ921R000028
Judicial Outreach Liaison and Fellows Program
Question and NHTSA Response:
1. In regards to Section C-1 Eligible Applicants and under the list of requirements required by recipients of the grant, the NOFO referenced above states: “Have a membership of mostly judges and lawyers” Our organization 26,000 judicial alumni who consider themselves members of our judicial community. Can you please clarify/explain your definition of “membership?”
NHTSA Response: The grantee/organization should have a membership of currently active, sitting judges who hear Impaired Driving cases on a daily/weekly basis. The organization/grantee should be focused on judicial and legal issues and be in daily or weekly contact with these judges. The organization/grantee should have a thorough understanding of the standards of evidence in and complexities of impaired driving cases.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .