693JF720R000021_RFQ_Phase_I_Final-attachments-Amend-2-a.pdf
PDF 292 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Video Scoreboard for USMMA Tomb Field
- Solicitation number
- 693JF720R000021
About this file
This document contains a notice of proposed contract actions and solicitation for a design-build acquisition to procure and install a new video scoreboard. The scope includes investigative work, surveying, design, demolition, rigging, supplying and installing the new scoreboard, removing and disposing of the existing scoreboard, commissioning, testing, training, certifying, and providing a 10-year warranty. The work is a 100% small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 236220 and size standard of $39.5 million. The contract will be awarded on a firm fixed price basis by the Maritime Administration in September 2020 for work to be completed by December 2020 at the United States Merchant Marine Academy campus in New York. Interested small businesses should register on SAM.gov and monitor the site for proposal documents to be posted in August 2020, with responses due on a date specified in the solicitation. Payment and performance bonds equaling 100% of the contract price will be required.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 1
COMPANY EXPERIENCE FORM (PAST PERFORMANCE)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: DUNs Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: DOT/MARAD REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO DOT/MARAD WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE
SUBMISSION ON DOT/MARAD SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT
QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED
DIRECTLY TO DOT/MARAD. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR DOT/MARAD POC INFORMATION.
THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/ Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E
VG
S
M
U
N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;
responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s E VG S M U N timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. Yes No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?
(Includes: following the user’s rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N
7. GENERAL
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.
Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
Attachment 5. Letter of Commitment for Key Personnel
ATTACHMENT 5
LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY
PERSONNEL (COMPANY LETTERHEAD
PERMITTED)
TO: Contracting Officer SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for
Dear Sir or Madam:
I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), that I will fulfill the duty of (Job Title).
Sincerely, (prospective employee signs)
Date: _
Attachment 6. Letter of Commitment for Design Firm / Teaming Arrangement
ATTACHMENT 6
LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR DESIGN FIRM
(USE COMPANY LETTERHEAD)
TO: Contracting Officer SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for _____________________
Dear Sir or Madam:
I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), that (insert name of design firm) will fulfill the duties of (state role on a project)
Sincerely, (Authorized Official)
Date: _________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .