PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONAIRE.docx
DOCX document 13 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-R-000004
About this file
This document includes a past performance evaluation questionnaire and a federal contract opportunity notice for highway and bridge design and engineering services. The contract opportunity is seeking statements of qualifications from firms to provide highway and bridge design, engineering, planning, architectural, and other related services for construction projects within the United States and its territories. Interested firms should submit responses by January 28, 2020 following the instructions and criteria in the SF330 form, including past performance references and descriptions of relevant experience. The contract has a minimum value of $100,000 over five years and a total estimated value of $80 million. The work will be awarded to a maximum of four highly qualified firms through indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts for individual task orders over the base year and four option years.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0001 HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE DESIGN.pdf | ||
| REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS-01062020.pdf | ||
| REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS.pdf | ||
| REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Send to eflhd.ae@dot.gov
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONAIRE
Today’s date:
Reference’s name, phone number, and title
Name of A/E firm:
Project Name and for what agency was the work performed:
Nature of work performed:
Dates work was performed:
Was this Contractor the Prime or Sub on this contract?
If Prime, were Subs used:
If Subs used, Type and Extent of Subcontracting:
Did the Prime have good relations and control of subs?
Were there problems on the project?
Was the contractor cooperative in addressing problems and changes? In what ways?
Evaluate the firm as outstanding, above average, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory in the following areas:
Thoroughness of site investigations
Project management and adherence to schedules
Meeting cost limits/cost control
Cooperativeness and responsiveness
Quality assurance and quality control
Overall ranking (outstanding, above average, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory)
If you had the opportunity, would you want to work with this contractor again? Why? Why not?
Would you recommend this firm for future work? With or without reservations?
Any additional comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .