Bridge_Inspection_Report_5220-004P3250.pdf

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5220-004P

REED'S BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 4/24/14

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

CONCRETE

FRAME

NOT APPLICABLE

BITUMINOUS

UNKNOWN

N/A

MASONRY

0000 / NONE

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

19.0 FT (5.8 M)

19.0 FT (5.8 M)

33.3 FT (10.1 M)

29.9 FT (9.1 M)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

CHICKAMAUGA & CHATTANOOGA NATIONAL MILITARY PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 1.10 (KM PT 1.77)

STATE: ................................. GEORGIA LOCATION: 0.2 miles from U.S. Route 27.

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ REED'S BRIDGE ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. STREAM

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include scour at the abutment corners; exposed rebar on the slab underside; deteriorated masonry mortar joints; accumulation of debris along the parapets; a dislodged stone at the northeast parapet end; a tree growing close to the northeast wingwall; cracks with vegetation growth in the asphalt pavement; and missing object markers at all four of the bridge corners.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, H. SALAD

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/15/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5220-004P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.9, 61.2 PLACE ENGINEERED RIPRAP AT UPSTREAM CORNER OF EAST ABUTMENT AND

DOWNSTREAM CORNER OF WEST ABUTMENT.

7 CY

58.6, 60.1 REPOINT MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS NECESSARY. RESET DISPLACED STONE

AT NORTHEAST PARAPET END.

10 LF

58.3, 222.4 CLEAN AND SEAL CRACKS IN PAVEMENT TO PREVENT WATER INTRUSION. 50 LF

60.6 REMOVE TREE AGAINST NORTHEAST WINGWALL. 1 LS

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE PARAPET ENDS. 4 EA

59.3 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK SLAB UNDERSIDE. COAT WITH APPROVED

PROTECTIVE SEALANT.

2 SF

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5220-004P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N

N N G N N N N F G

N G

G N N N N F G N F G N N

N N N N N N N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

(BURIED)

58.3 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT ALONG

CENTERLINE AND IN EASTBOUND LANE. MINOR TRANSVERSE

CRACKING OVER EAST ABUTMENT.

58.6 MINOR DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS,

PROGRESSING TO MODERATE IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MORTAR

JOINTS AT SOUTHEAST PARAPET END HAVE BEEN REPOINTED

RECENTLY AND ARE IN GOOD CONDITION.

MINOR FRACTURES OF SEVERAL PARAPET STONES. STONE

DISLODGED SLIGHTLY AT NORTHEAST PARAPET END.

58.7 DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ADJACENT TO PARAPETS; DEBRIS

RETAINS MOISTURE AND PROMOTES FREEZE/THAW ACTION.

59.3,8 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON CONCRETE FILLETS AT

INTERSECTION OF SLAB UNDERSIDE, FASCIA RING STONES, AND

BREASTWALLS.

SPALL ON SLAB UNDERSIDE NEAR WEST ABUTMENT, NORTH SIDE,

WITH 23" OF REBAR EXPOSED. GRAFFITI ON UNDERSIDE.

59.8 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF FASCIA MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS; MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE FROM RING

STONES; MINOR CRACKING OF SOME STONES. MINOR

VEGETATION AND MOSS GROWTH ALONG SOUTH FASCIA.

60.1,6 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS; MINOR LEAKAGE THROUGH JOINTS IN SEVERAL

LOCATIONS. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS. TREE

GROWING ADJACENT TO NORTHEAST WINGWALL; ROOTS ARE

PRESENT ALONG FACE OF EAST BREASTWALL. GRAFFITI ON BOTH

BREASTWALLS.

60.9, 61.1,2 STREAM FLOWS PARTIALLY AGAINST UPSTREAM CORNER OF EAST

ABUTMENT AND DOWNSTREAM CORNER OF WEST ABUTMENT.

MODERATE BANK EROSION ON NORTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT.

1' DEEP SCOUR HOLE AT UPSTREAM CORNER OF EAST

BREASTWALL. MODERATE BANK EROSION ON BOTH SIDES OF

STRUCTURE.

G G N F G N

N

N

N

N

INSPECTION DATE: 4/24/14

STRUCTURE NO. 5220-004P FIELD INSPECTION REPORT

REED'S BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

5. OTHER

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F F N G N

LOW

SUFF

6 FT.

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

SILT,ROCK

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1.

(ROADWAY STRIPING)

N N N F G G N G F

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

222.4 TRANSVERSE JOINTS AT APPROACHES. MODERATE CRACKING OF

WEST APPROACH PAVEMENT WITH VEGETATION GROWTH IN

CRACKS.

222.7 NO OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT AT PARAPET ENDS.

222.9 ROADWAY STRIPING IS DAMAGED AND FADING.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5220-004P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 36 33 60 55

TYPE 3 29 27 49 45

TYPE 3S2 46 42 77 70

TYPE 3-3 57 52 96 87

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (HS20 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND

CONDITION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5220-004P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: CHICKAMAUGA & CHATTANOOGA NATIONAL MILITARY PAR (1) STATE: ....................................... 134 - GEORGIA (GA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:

(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ...

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:

(210) OPERATING UNIT:

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:

(22) OWNER:

047 - CATOOSA

160000000

STREAM

REED'S BRIDGE ROAD

5220004P0000000

0.2 miles from U.S. Route

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

1.10 (KM PT 1.77)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

REED'S BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE

1 - BRIDGE

5220-004P

4 - SOUTHEAST

004P

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

YES

PARK

NONE

66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

07 - FRAME 00 - OTHER (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:

1 (46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

19.0 FT (5.8 M)

19.0 FT (5.8 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

0 - UNKNOWN A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

0 - UNKNOWN B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE (218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.1 TONS (54.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 4/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5220-004P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 34°56'30.00" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 29.9 FT (9.1 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 85°15'19.60" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.3 FT (10.1 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 2 MI (3 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 20.0 FT (6.0 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (2.0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (2.0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 3249 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2012 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 3899 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 29.9 FT (9.1 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2032 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 3 - PARAPET ONLY

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 9 - OTHER

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.25 FT (0.69 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

U - Unknown foundation. Not ye

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5220-004P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5220-004P

FLOW

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST AWAY FROM VISITOR CENTER; NOTE LACK

OF OBJECT MARKERS AT PARAPET ENDS

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW

LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #4 - WEST APPROACH PAVEMENT

JOINT; NOTE ALSO CRACKS IN PAVEMENT,

AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN CRACKS

PHOTO #5 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE,

EASTBOUND LANE SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION

ALONG PARAPETS,

SOUTH PARAPET SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - DISLODGED AND FRACTURED

STONE AT EAST END OF NORTH PARAPET;

NOTE ALSO MISSING SIGN FROM POST

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL MASONRY MORTAR JOINT DETERIORATION,

NORTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #11 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED

REBAR ON SLAB UNDERSIDE AT WEST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL FRACTURES WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES, NORTH

SIDE RING STONES SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL WEEP HOLES, EAST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - SCOUR AT UPSTREAM END OF

EAST ABUTMENT; NOTE EXPOSED FOOTING

PHOTO #16 - TREE GROWING AT NORTHEAST

WINGWALL

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - BANK EROSION AT NORTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #19 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #20 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #21 - LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM DECK

PHOTO #22 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM DECK