QA_01-07-2022.pdf
PDF 101 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 69056721R000015
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QA_01-18-2022.pdf | ||
| Amendment A005.pdf | ||
| QA_01-12-2022.pdf | ||
| QA_01-13-2022.pdf | ||
| Amendment A004.pdf | ||
| QA_01-11-2022.pdf | ||
| QA_01-10-2022.pdf | ||
| Amendment A003.pdf | ||
| QA_01-05-2022.pdf | ||
| QA_01-03-2022.pdf | ||
| Amendment A002.pdf | ||
| Amendment A001.pdf | ||
| FLH Bridge oversized or overload vehicle permit request form Oct 2018.pdf | ||
| SD NPS PP BADL 2020(1)_PLANS_FINAL_signed.pdf | ||
| RFP SD NPS PP.pdf | ||
| BADL_C6_Final_Report.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SD NPS PP BADL 2020(1)
Pavement Preservation Badlands
# General Technical Question Answer Date
1 X
Can you please clarify Bid submittal deadline time. On Sheet A‐3 when it references local time, is that the Project Sites time, or bid turn in address time. Both locations are in 2 different time zones.
Proposals are due by 1300 PST on the date shown on Page A‐3, in Box 13a. This clarification will be made under Amendment A002.
1/3/22
2 X
A Local Contractor stated there’s a contract (Replace Deteriorated Curbing and Walkways in Parking Lots for Visitor Safety PMIS 245411) out for work in the park to replace timber curbing and walkways in several parking lots. Is this other contract going to interfere with the pavement preservation?
See FAR Clause 52.236‐8 on Page C‐102, and bid accordingly.
1/5/22
3 X Do we have to deal with Pine Ridge Indian Reservation? Nothing is mentioned in the bid documents.
All coordination with Tribes will be conducted by National Park Service.
Contractor will direct all issues through CO
1/6/21
4 X
South Dakota Department of Transportation material specifications, please elaborate what “Medium gradation (3/8‐inches maximum)” is?
SDDOT has several gradations with 3/8‐inch maximum, is it Type 1 A or B, Type 2 A, B or C?
This will be addressed under Amendment A003.
1/7/21
Check General or Technical
5 X
Aggregate in South Dakota is not compatible with cationic emulsions, In the SCR’s it says “South Dakota Department of Transportation material specifications for polymer asphaltic emulsion PMCRS‐2h”, there are no standard specifications for PMCRS‐2h in the SDDOT standard specifications.
This will be addressed under Amendment A003.
1/7/21
6 X Is an MTV (material transfer vehicle) or Shuttle Buggy “really” needed on the 4,000 TN of Hotmix?
An MTV according to FP‐14 401.05(b) will not be required.
1/7/21
7 X Need to clarify the Hotmix if it can be of a SDDOT (local) variety, a Marshall Design, w/Neat or a Modified AC.
See FP‐14 Subsection 403.02. 1/7/21
8 X
I was wondering if there’s going to be another amendment due to the questions I submitted on January 4, 2022. The reason I’m asking is because I must send our bid package via Fedex Express today by 3:00 PM over to you guys so it gets there in time. Please let me know and thank you.
We will issue an Amendment A003 once it is finalized and this amendment will be extending the proposal due date.
1/7/21
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .