P20AC00366 GLRI UMN GLNF CESU Bees_NOI to Award 2_11_2020.pdf
PDF 333 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GLNF CESU: Understanding Native Bee Diversity and Distribution in Great Lakes National Parks- GLRI
- Opportunity number
- NPS-NOIP20AC00366
- Issued by
-
Department of the Interior
About this file
Notice of Intent
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE: NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD
This announcement is not a request for applications.
This announcement is to provide public notice of the National Park Service’s intention to award financial assistance for the following project activities. Refer to Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination.
ABSTRACT
Grants.gov Opportunity Number Project Title Recipient Anticipated Federal Funding Non-Federal Cost Share Total Anticipated Award Amount
Award Instrument
Anticipated Period of Performance
Legal Authority
CFDA # and Title
Single Source Justification Criteria
National Park Service Point of Contact
PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE
Section 1. Project Summary
Task Agreement Cooperative Agreement
Grant Agreement
STATEMENT OF WORK SUMMARY
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES
A. The recipient shall be responsible for the following items under this agreement:
B. The NPS Responsibilities:
A task agreement is proposed;
A cooperative agreement is proposed;
therefore substantial involvement by NPS is anticipated during the period of performance of this agreement. In support of this agreement NPS will:
A grant agreement is proposed, therefore no substantial involvement on the part of the NPS is anticipated for the successful completion of the statement of work. It is anticipated that involvement will be limited to actions related to monitoring project performance and technical assistance at the request of the recipient.
Section 3. Single Source Justification
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
SINGLE SOURCE POLICY REQUIREMENTS
National Park Service Policy FAP&P 1443-2015-06 requires a written justification which explains why competition is not practicable. The justification must address one of the following criteria.
In order for an assistance award to be made without competition, the award must satisfy one or more of the following criteria:
(1) Unsolicited Proposal – The proposed award is the result of an unsolicited assistance application which represents a unique or innovative idea, method, or approach which is not the subject of a current or planned contract or assistance award, but which is deemed advantageous to the program objectives. The unsolicited proposal must demonstrate an innovative capability or concept not currently available to the government, and prepared without Government involvement. ;
(2) Continuation – The activity to be funded is necessary to the satisfactory completion of, or is a continuation of, an activity presently being funded, for which competition would have a significant adverse effect on the continuity or completion of the activity;
(3) Legislative intent – The language in the applicable authorizing legislation or legislative history clearly indicates Congress’ intent to restrict the award to a particular recipient of purpose;
(4) Unique Qualifications – The applicant is uniquely qualified to perform the activity based upon a variety of demonstrable factors such as location, property ownership, voluntary support capacity, technical expertise, or other such unique qualifications. Successful past performance, familiarity with existing requirements, capabilities that can be obtained or matched by a competitor, or a positive reputation, are not considered to be unique qualifications.
(5) Emergencies – Program/award where there is insufficient time available (due to a compelling and unusual urgency, or substantial danger to health or safety) for adequate competitive procedures to be followed.
NPS did not solicit full and open competition for this award based the following criteria:
Task Agreement issued under previously competed or single source master cooperative agreement per Section 2 above. Single Source Justification not applicable.
Continuation
Unique Qualifications
Unsolicited Proposal
Legislative Intent
Explanation of the proposed recipient’s qualifications or the criteria of the proposed project which requires use of the single source criteria cited.
Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination
Emergency
The National Park Service intends to award a task agreement under a previously competed or single source justified award.
The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified cooperative agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.
The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified grant agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.
Section 4. Department of the Interior Secretary’s Priorities
This award will support the following DOI Secretary priority(ies):
Other Key Initiatives:
Employment of veterans.
Supporting DOI Infrastructure needs.
Creating jobs in the American economy.
Access to outdoor recreation opportunities.
Priority 1: Creating a conservation stewardship legacy second only to Teddy Roosevelt Utilize science to identify best practices to manage land and water resources and adapt to changes in the environment.
Examine land use planning process and land use designations that govern public use and access.
Revise and streamline the environmental and regulatory review process while maintaining environmental standards.
Review DOI water storage, transportation, and distribution systems to identify opportunities to resolve conflicts and expand capacity.
Foster relationships with conservation organizations advocating for balanced stewardship and use of public lands.
Identify and implement initiatives to expand access to DOI lands for hunting and fishing.
Shift the balance towards providing greater public access to public lands over restrictions to access.
Priority 2: Utilizing our natural resources Ensure American energy is available to meet our security and economic needs.
Ensure access to mineral resources, especially the critical and rare earth minerals.
Refocus timber programs to embrace the entire 'healthy forests' lifecycle.
Manage competition for grazing resources.
Priority 3: Restoring trust with local communities Be a better neighbor with those closest to our resources by improving dialogue and relationships with persons and entities bordering our lands.
Expand the lines of communication with Governors, state natural resource offices, Fish and Wildlife offices, water authorities, county commissioners, Tribes, and local communities.
Priority 4: Ensuring sovereignty means something Support tribal self-determination, self-governance, and sovereignty.
Solidify mutual interests between the U.S. and the freely associated states and territories.
Priority 5: Generating additional revenues to support DOI & National interests Ensure that the public receives the full market value for the natural resources produced on Federal lands.
Ensure that fees or costs levied for DOI services are reasonable and targeted to achieve cost recovery.
Consider the impact of DOI decisions on economic development and job creation.
Priority 6: Protecting our people and the border Actively support efforts to secure our southern border.
Ensure DOI law enforcement staffing addresses public safety risks anticipated on DOI land.
Promote a "public service" demeanor within our law enforcement community.
Priority 7: Striking a regulatory balance
Reduce the administrative and regulatory burden imposed on U.S.
industry and the public.
Ensure that Endangered Species Act decisions are based on strong science and thorough analysis.
Priority 8: Modernizing our infrastructure Support the White House Public/Private Partnership Initiative to modernize U.S. infrastructure.
Remove impediments to infrastructure development and facilitate private sector efforts to construct infrastructure projects serving American needs.
Prioritize DOI infrastructure needs to highlight:
1. Construction of infrastructure;
2. Cyclical maintenance;
3. Deferred maintenance.
Senior executives are expected to provide leadership in achieving goals of the President and the Secretary.
The Management Team is expected to:
1. Ensure cost-effective operations and quality service to the public;
2. Facilitate organizational cooperation and conflict resolution;
3. Ensure the workplace environment is conducive to employee productivity and safety;
4. Hold individuals accountable for actions that violate DOI policies and requirements.
Priority 10: Achieving our goals and leading our team forward
The proposed project does not support any of the DOI Secretary priorities, but the project is being funded for the following reasons:
Priority 9: Reorganizing for the next 100 years
Improve alignment and integration of the DOI organizational structure. Redistribute organizational resources (people and funding) to enhance mission achievement and improved public service.
Improve organizational alignment with Executive Branch counterparts with major land management assets or influence.
| PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES |
| STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE OF SUPPORT OR STIMULATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL AUTHORITY |
| PROJECT OVERVIEW |
| Grant: |
| gov number: NPS-NOIP20AC00366 |
| Title: GLNF CESU: Understanding Native Bee Diversity and Distribution |
| Funding: $20,000.00 |
| Cost share: 0.00 |
| Total funding: $150,000.00 |
| POP: 4/1/2020 - 3/30/2025 |
| Authority: 54 USC §100703 Cooperative Study Units |
| CFDA: 15.945, Cooperative Research and Training Programs |
| SS: Unique Qualifications |
| POC: Noël Ann Miller, Lead Grants Management Officer, noel_miller@nps.gov; (402) 661-1659 |
| Goals: Ninety percent of the world's flowering plant species depend on insect pollination for reproduction. Native bees are one of the most imperiled groups of pollinators. Native bees play a significant role in our ecosystems and are the most effective pollinators across the diverse habitats of the Great Lakes basin. This project will expand the understanding of the status, distribution, and habitat needs of native bees in Great Lakes national parks. This project will also help to identify areas in the Great Lakes Basin where habitat management, restoration, and conservation may have the greatest benefit for native bee species. |
| PP: The scientific community gains by new knowledge provided through this research and related results dissemination of native bee pollinator communities in the Great Lakes. |
| Overview: Recipient will study the native bee fauna in Great Lakes national parks. While hundreds of native bee species occur in the Great Lakes Basin, their distribution, habitat associations, and management needs are poorly known. The goal of this project is to survey native bees at several Great Lakes national parks. Bee specimens collected from a variety of habitats at Great Lakes national parks will be identified to species or lowest taxonomic resolution possible by expert bee taxonomists at University of Minnesota (UMN). UMN will maintain a specimen-level database with associated collection and identification data. Recipient and NPS will collaborate on data analysis. Results of studies will be published and available to the public. The project will complement current research and inventorying and monitoring activities of NPS and inform restoration and management efforts. This project will also contribute to a greater understanding of native bee biodiversity and conservation. |
| Recipient: University of Minnesota |
| Sub Involv: 1. Collect, process, curate, and label bee (Apoidea) specimens; |
2. Provide to recipient, properly labeled and curated specimens;
3. Provide to recipient, associated specimen data in spreadsheet form;
4. Provide information or data to assist recipient, where available;
5. Collaborate with recipient on data analysis;
6. Review and approve results reporting for NPS standards for technical reports.
| Justification: Recipient is a member of the Great Lakes - Northern Forest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit. Dr. Daniel Cariveau and his native bee laboratory (see: https://www.beelab.umn.edu/wild-bees) is one of the top research groups working on North American native bees. Their work focuses on native bee communities with a strong emphasis on pollination ecology. Most recently, their work focuses on restoration ecology as a way to conserve biodiversity and as a tool for examining basic questions in ecology. They are particularly interested in how conservation actions such as restoration and land management influence the structure of wild bee communities and the pollination services they provide. Members of the Cariveau lab include PhD-level bee taxonomists with the expertise and experience necessary to identify native bees from the Great Lakes region. The University of Minnesota Insect Collection maintains a large collection of native bees from the Great Lakes states, that can serve as a reference for identifying specimens. |
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box23: Off |
| Check Box24: Off |
| Check Box25: Off |
| Check Box26: Yes |
| Check Box27: Off |
| Check Box29: Off |
| Check Box30: Off |
| Check Box31: Off |
| Check Box32: Off |
| Check Box33: Off |
| Check Box34: Off |
| Check Box35: Off |
| Check Box36: Off |
| Check Box39: Off |
| Check Box40: Off |
| Check Box41: Off |
| Check Box44: Off |
| Check Box45: Off |
| Check Box46: Off |
| Check Box47: Off |
| Check Box48: Off |
| Check Box49: Off |
| Check Box50: Off |
| Check Box51: Off |
| Check Box52: Off |
| Check Box53: Off |
| Check Box54: Off |
| Check Box55: Off |
| Check Box56: Off |
| Check: Choice 2 |
| CheckA: Choice 4 |
| NA: |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Responsibilities: 1. Identify bee (Apoidea) specimens collected in 2017-2021 from Great Lakes national parks to species or lowest taxonomic resolution possible; |
2. Preserve and maintain care of specimens to the curatorial standards of the National Park Service;
3. Maintain specimen-level database that includes species name, unique specimen identification alphanumeric code, NPS accession number, locality, and collection data;
4. Provide all data to National Park Service, upon request;
5. Collaborate with National Park Service on data analysis and participate in discussions about future management options;
6. Provide summary report that includes: methods used; brief introduction, list of species identified with all associated collection data, by park; list of any rare species or species of special concern identified, by park; and discussion of data.
File details come from the government source that posted it.