6 - Evaluation Criteria Template - LPTA.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25625Q0463
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria template for a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procurement. The evaluation will be based on two factors: Technical Capabilities (Factor 1) and Price (Factor 2), with award going to the lowest priced proposal that meets the technical acceptability standards.
The technical evaluation uses a pass/fail basis requiring offerors to demonstrate: sufficient qualified personnel for hood certification, capacity to deliver certification results on schedule, and adequate quality control procedures to ensure compliance. Price will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness. Past performance will only be considered for responsibility determination. This template appears to be associated with a VA solicitation for fire extinguisher maintenance and inspection services at Southeast Louisiana Veterans Healthcare Systems facilities, requiring service for 387 existing units and purchase of 10 new Amerex fire extinguishers.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 -Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1 - Combined Synopsis - Fire Extinguisher 02.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25625Q0463_1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria Template Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
Basis of Award:
A Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable procurement is being conducted. As such, award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for the non-cost factor. Past Performance history will be considered for responsibility determination purposes only (FAR 9.104-1(c). The evaluation factors are as follows:
Factor 1-Technical Factor 2-Price
Under the ‘technical factor,’ each offeror’s responses will be evaluated on a ‘pass/fail’ basis or ‘acceptable/unacceptable’ basis. This determination will be based on the offeror demonstrating in its proposal a technical solution that minimally meets the technical requirements specified in the Solicitation’s Statement of Work.
Price will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness.
Factor 1 – TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES: Offerors must submit relevant information demonstrating technical capability to satisfactorily perform the following requirement as expressed in the Statement of Work in the Solicitation
1. Sufficient number of trained and qualified personnel to conduct the specified hood certification.
2. Sufficient capacity to deliver certification results on a timely basis specified in the Statement of Work.
3. Sufficient quality control policies, processes, and procedures to ensure contract compliance.
Factor 2 – PRICE: Prices will be evaluated on the basis of price fairness and reasonableness.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .